SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Experience in Our General Surgery Clinic: Single Center

Genel Cerrahi Kliniğimizde Perkutan Endoskopik Gastrostomi Deneyimimiz; Tek Merkez Sonuçlarımız

HAKAN ERPEK
EYÜP MURAT YILMAZ
Akay EDİZSOY
Pars TUNÇYÜREK
Ali Doğan BOZDAĞ
Pages
40–42
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Wound infection had developed in 12 (7.5%) patients.Discussion and Conclusion: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is cheap, safe and efficient method than surgical gastrostomy that could make a person very comfortable with practice and experienced team alone

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction and Aim: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a method used for enteral feeding in case of regular functioning of gastrointestinal tract for patient could not fed orally for various reasons.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we would like to Özkul ve ark.Özkul et al.present cases that performed percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG) in our clinic.Material and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2015, 159 patients who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Wound infection had developed in 12 (7.5%) patients.Discussion and Conclusion: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is cheap, safe and efficient method than surgical gastrostomy that could make a person very comfortable with practice and experienced team alone
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a method used for enteral feeding in case of regular functioning of gastrointestinal tract for patient could not fed orally for various reasons. Currently this method is usually used esophagus cancer, proximal stomach cancer, malignancies of oral cavity because of severe dysphagia, intensive care patients that neurologically abnormal as cerebrovascular events that not take oral for a long time and prevention of complications of nasogastric feeding. In this study, we would like to Özkul ve ark.Özkul et al.present cases that performed percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG) in our clinic.Material and Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2015, 159 patients who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were included. The demographic data of these patients, indications for PEG procedure, early complications were recorded.Results:159 patients who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy were included, 71 (44.6%) of patients were female, 88 (55.4%) of them were male. It was performed in 30 (18.8%) of them for malignancy, 121 (76.1%) of them for neurologicl disorders, 8 (5.1%) of them for inability to feed because of other reasons such as prolonged ventilation. 10 (6.2%) patients had catheter over leak and 4 (2.5%) patients had catheter occlusion. Wound infection had developed in 12 (7.5%) patients.Discussion and Conclusion: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is cheap, safe and efficient method than surgical gastrostomy that could make a person very comfortable with practice and experienced team alone

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Perkutan endoskopik gastrostomi, çeşitli sebeplerden ötürü oral yolla beslenemeyecek kişilerde gastrointestinal sistemin düzenli çalışması durumunda enteral beslenme için kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Bu yöntem günümüzde genellikle özofagus ve proksimal mide kanserleri, oral kavite kanserleri gibi ciddi disfaji yapan maligniteler ile serebrovasküler olay gibi uzun süre oral alamayacak nörolojik sekelli yoğun bakım hastalarında nazogastrik beslenmenin komplikasyonlarını engellemek için kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmamızda kliniğimizde uyguladığımız Perkutan Endoskopik Gastrostomi (PEG) olgularını sunmayı planladık.Yöntem ve Gereçler: Ocak 2011- Aralık 2015 Tarihleri arasında PEG takılan toplam 159 hasta dahil edildi. Bu hastaların demografik verileri, PEG takılma endikasyonları ve erken dönem komplikasyonları kaydedildi Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 159 hasta dahil edilmiş olup bu hastaların 71'i kadın (%44,6), 88'i erkek (%55,4) hastadır. PEG takılma nedenleri; 30'u malignite (%18,8),121'i nörolojik hastalık (%76,1) ve 8'i(%5,1) diğer nedenlerden (uzamış ventilasyon vs.) beslenememe sebepleri idi. 10 hastada (%6,2) katater yerinde sızıntı, 4 hastada (%2,5) katater tıkanması ve 12 hastada(%7,5) yara yeri enfeksiyonu gelişti.Tartışma ve Sonuç: PEG cerrahi gastrostomiye göre çok daha güvenli, ucuz, etkili, pratik ve deneyimli bir kişinin , ekibi ile çok rahat yapabileceği bir işlemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

ERPEK, H., YILMAZ, E. M., EDİZSOY, A., TUNÇYÜREK, P., BOZDAĞ, A. D. (2016). Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Experience in Our General Surgery Clinic: Single Center. Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 1, 40–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/161337

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pedi- atr Surg 1980;15:872-5.
  2. De Souza e Mello GF, Lukashok HP, Meine GC, Small IA, de Carvalho RL, Guimarães DP, et al. Outpatient percuta- neous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:1487-93.
  3. Kumar S, Langmore S, Goddeau RP Jr, Alhazzani A, Selim M, Caplan LR, et al. Predictors of percutaneous endosco- pic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with severe dysphagia from an acutesubacute hemispheric infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2012;21(2):114-20.
  4. Karaca AS, Ali R, Çapar M, Karaca S. GastrostomyPercu- taneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Experience İn A General Surgery Clinic J Clin Anal Med 2015;6(suppl 1): 71-4.
  5. Tuncer K, Kılınçsoy N, Lebe E, Demirağ K, Özütemiz Ö, Bor S ve ark. Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi sonuçlarımız: 49 olgunun irdelenmesi. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergi- si 2003;2:64-8. Grant JP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy initial placement by single endoscopic technique and long-term follow-up. Ann Surg 1993;217:168-74.
  6. Paramsothy S, Papadopoulos G, Mollison LC, Leong RW. Resumption of oral intake following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;24:1098-101.
  7. Baş B, Oymac E, Ayvaz UU, Çiyiltepe H, Dinç B, Kara HC. Effect of body mass index on processing time and mor- bidity in elderly percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy pa- tient. J Clin Anal Med 2015; DOI: 10.4328/JCAM.3279. Abuksis G, Mor M, Segal N, Shemesh I, Plout S, Sulkes J, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: high mor- tality rates in hospitalized patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2000:95;128-32.
  8. Löser C, Aschl G, Hebuterne X, Mathus-Vliegen EM, Muscaritoli M, Niv Y, et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr 2005;24:848-61.
  9. Akçan Y, Arslan M, Arslan S, Arslan S, Bayraktar Y, Kan- su T, ve ark. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; The Hacettepe University Hospital experience. Türkiye Klinikleri Gastroenterohepatoloji 1999;10:23-7.
  10. Ali T, Le V, Sharma T, Vega KJ, Srinivasan N, Tierney WM, et al. Post-PEG feding time: a web based natio- nal survey amongst gastroenterologists. Dig Liver Dis 2011;43(10):768-71.
  11. Erdil A, Tüzün A, Saka M, Uygun U, Güleç B, Bağci S ve ark. Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi uygulamalarımız ve sonuçları. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi 2001;43(4):379-83.
  12. Erdil A, Saka M, Ateş Y, Ates Y, Tuzun A, Bagci S, Uygun A, v