Journals / Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

Single Center Experience: Retrospective Analysis of The Relation of Colorectal Polyp and Carcinoma Localization

Tek Merkez Deneyimi: Bölgemizde Kolorektal Polip ve Kanser Dağılımı ve Sıklığının Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
134–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Of the polyps with neoplastic characteristics, 95 (62.5 %) were tubular adenomas, 10 (6.5%) tubulovillous adenomas, and 2 (1.2%) villous adenomas.Conclusions:In this study, the prevalence, localization and histopathological findings of colon polyp types over an approximately two-yearperiod was revealed in patients undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons in our endoscopy unit, our results were found to be similar to those reported in the literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Aims: Removal of polyps detected during colonoscopy and establishment of the pathological diagnosis are recommended because of theirpotentialcancer risk.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Colonoscopy reports between January - 2012 and January- 2014 were retrospectively reviewed from the endoscopy archive system in Afyonkarahisar State Hospital, Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Of the polyps with neoplastic characteristics, 95 (62.5 %) were tubular adenomas, 10 (6.5%) tubulovillous adenomas, and 2 (1.2%) villous adenomas.Conclusions:In this study, the prevalence, localization and histopathological findings of colon polyp types over an approximately two-yearperiod was revealed in patients undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons in our endoscopy unit, our results were found to be similar to those reported in the literature
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Aims: Removal of polyps detected during colonoscopy and establishment of the pathological diagnosis are recommended because of theirpotentialcancer risk. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence, localization of polyps with cancer and their histopathological results in patients under going colonoscopy for various reasons in our endoscopy unit. Materials and Methods: Colonoscopy reports between January - 2012 and January- 2014 were retrospectively reviewed from the endoscopy archive system in Afyonkarahisar State Hospital, Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology. Polyps were noted according to their localization and histopathologic types. Results: According to the colonoscopy reports, polip or cancer were detected in 204 (12.5%) patients. 136 of the patients (66.6%) were male and 68(34.4%) were female and their meanage was 60,34±12,8 years. 152 of 204 lesions (74.5%)polyps and 52 (25.5%) colorectal cancer detected. As our clinic polyps prevalence %9,3 , colorectal cancer prevalence 3.2% detected.Colonic polyps were most commonly seen in the rectum with 50 (32.8%)polyps. Colonic cancer were most commonly seen in the rectum with 31 (59,6%) cancers. Of the polyps with neoplastic characteristics, 95 (62.5 %) were tubular adenomas, 10 (6.5%) tubulovillous adenomas, and 2 (1.2%) villous adenomas.Conclusions:In this study, the prevalence, localization and histopathological findings of colon polyp types over an approximately two-yearperiod was revealed in patients undergoing colonoscopy for various reasons in our endoscopy unit, our results were found to be similar to those reported in the literature

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Kolonoskopi sırasında saptanan poliplerin, potansiyel kanser riski nedeniyle çıkartılması ve patolojik tanısının konması önerilmektedir.Bizim çalışmamızın amacı, Çalışmadaki amacımız merkezimizde çeşitli nedenlerle yapılan kolonoskopi sonucunda saptanan poliplerin prevalans, lokalizasyon ve ile birlikte histopatolojik sonuçlarını ortaya koymaktırGereç ve Yöntem: Afyonkarahisar Devlet Hastanesi Gastroenteroloji kliniğinde Endoskopi Ünitesi'nde Ocak 2012-Ocak 2014 arasındaki kolonoskopi raporları endoskopi arşiv sisteminden retrospektif olarak tarandı. Yerleşim özellikleri ve histopatolojik tiplerine göre poliplerve kanserler kaydedildi. Bulgular: Kolonoskopi raporlarına görehastaların 204 (%12.5) ünde polip veya kolorektal kanser saptandı. Hastaların 136 sı erkek, 68 i kadın saptandı, hastaların yaş ortalaması 60,34±12,8 idi. 204 lezyonun 152'si (%74,5) polip ve 52'si (%25,5) kolorektal kanser idi. Kliniğimizin polip prevalansı %9.3 iken, kolorektal kanser prevalansı %3.2 idi.Kolon poliplerinin büyük kısmının rektumda 50 (%32.8) oldukları tespit edildi. Kolon kanserlerininde büyük kısmının rektumda 31 (%59,6) oldukları tespit edildi Poliplerde histopatolojik tip açısından en büyük hasta grubunu 95 (%62.5) olgu ile tübüler adenom oluştururken, diğer neoplastik özellikte olan poliplerin 10 tanesi (%6.5)tübülovillöz adenom, 2 tanesi de (%1.2) villöz adenom olarak saptandı.Sonuç: Bu çalışmada endoskopi ünitemizde yaklaşık 2 sene boyunca çeşitli nedenlerle kolonoskopi yapılan hastalarımızdaki kolon poliplerinin ve kanserlerinin prevalansı, lokalizasyonu ve histolojik sonuçları ortaya konmuştur. Çalışmamızdaki tüm sonuçların genel olarak literatür ile uyumlu olduğu gözlendi

🔖

Cite This Article

KANDEMİR, A. (2016). Single Center Experience: Retrospective Analysis of The Relation of Colorectal Polyp and Carcinoma Localization. Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 134–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/161335

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sağlık Bakanlığı Kanserle Savaş Dairesi Başkanlığı 2006-2008 yılları Türkiye Kanser İnsidansı, www.kanser.gov.tr
  2. Eddy DM. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Sep 1;113(5):373-84
  3. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999 Mar 15;80(6):827-41
  4. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Mar-Apr;56(2):106-30
  5. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010 Feb 1;116(3):544-73
  6. Slattery ML, Friedman GD, Potter JD, Edwards S, Caan BJ, Samowitz W. A description of age, sex, and site distributi-ons of colon carcinoma in three geographic areas. Cancer. 1996 Oct 15;78(8):1666-70
  7. Potter JD, Slattery ML, Bostick RM, Gapstur SM. Co-lon cancer: a review of the epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):499-545
  8. Bufill JA. Colorectal cancer: evidence for distinct genetic categories based on proximal or distal tumor location. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 15;113(10):779-88
  9. Ozbakir 0 YM. Kolon polipleri ve polipozis sendromları. In: Gastroenteroloji. Ozen A, Sahin B, Yilmaz U, Soykan i. (eds.). Türk Gastroenteroloji Vakfı p.309-317,2002
  10. Bedenne L, Jouve JL. [Which endoscopic follow-up for resected colonic cancer?]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1998 Mar;22(3 Suppl):S155-9
  11. West DW, Slattery ML, Robison LM, Schuman KL, Ford MH, Mahoney AW, et al. Dietary intake and colon cancer: sex- and anatomic site-specific associations. Am J Epidemi-ol. 1989 Nov;130(5):883-94. 12.Konishi F, Morson BC. Pathology of colorectal adeno-mas: A colonoscopic survey. J Clin Pathol 1982;35:830-41. 13.O'Brien MJ, Winaver SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastro-enterology 1990;98:371-9. 14.Williams AR, Balasoorriya BAW, Day DW. Polyp and cancer of the large bovel: A necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982;23:835-42
  12. Eminler AT, Sakallı M, Irak K, et al. Gastroenteroloji ünitemizdeki kolonoskopik polipektomi sonuçlarımız. Aka-demik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi 2011;10:112-5
  13. Dolek Y, Karabulur YY, Topal F, et al. Gastrointestinal poliplerin boyut, lokalizasyon ve histopatolojik tip