Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3

Prevalence estimation and familial tendency of common forefoot deformities in Turkey: A survey of 2662 adults

Pages
167–173
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Constricting shoe wear was found to affect HV incidence in women (p < 0.001) and bun-ionette incidence in both sexes (p < 0.01).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This survey was designed to evaluate the prevalence estimations of HV, bunionette, hammertoe as well as their relations to shoe wearing and also familial tendency, in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Two thousand six hundred sixty two volunteers (1615 females and 1047 males) with a mean age of 34.15 ± 14.23 (range; 18 to 96) years were asked to answer the predetermined questionnaire between January and June, 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Constricting shoe wear was found to affect HV incidence in women (p < 0.001) and bun-ionette incidence in both sexes (p < 0.01).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: This survey was designed to evaluate the prevalence estimations of HV, bunionette, hammertoe as well as their relations to shoe wearing and also familial tendency, in Turkey. Material and Methods: Two thousand six hundred sixty two volunteers (1615 females and 1047 males) with a mean age of 34.15 ± 14.23 (range; 18 to 96) years were asked to answer the predetermined questionnaire between January and June, 2016. Hallux valgus, hammertoe and bunionette images were provided as references and every adult participant without any known forefoot problems or past forefoot surgery history was asked to rate his/her foot and to respond the questions about family history and shoe wearing habits. Responses were statistically analyzed. Results: The prevalence estimations of hallux valgus, bunionette and hammertoe were calculated as 54.3%, 13.8% and 8.9% and positive family history rates were 53.2%, 61.2% and 56.1%, respectively. All three deformities were more common in females than in males (p < 0.001). Nonetheless the older age group reported significantly higher prevalence rates for only HV (p < 0.001). Likewise, among the three deformities, females reported a higher rate of positive family history only in HV compared to men (p < 0.001). Constricting shoe wear was found to affect HV incidence in women (p < 0.001) and bun-ionette incidence in both sexes (p < 0.01).

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAYLI, U., ALTUNOK, E. Ç., GÜVEN, M., AKMAN, B., BIROS, J., ŞAYLI, A. (2018). Prevalence estimation and familial tendency of common forefoot deformities in Turkey: A survey of 2662 adults. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 3, 167–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/161164

References (15)

  1. Kelikian H. Deformities of the lesser toe. In: Kelikian H, ed. Hallux Valgus, Allied Deformities of the Forefoot and Metatarsalgia. Philadelphia: WB Saunders
  2. Kitaoka HB, Holiday AD. Lateral condylar resection for bunionette. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992
  3. :183e192. 28. Barouk LS. Some pathologies of the fifth ray: tailor's bunion. In: Barouk LS, ed. Forefoot Reconstruction Paris. Springer-Verlag
  4. 276e283. 27. Weil L, Weil LS. Osteotomies for bunionette deformity. Foot Ankle Clin N Am. 2011
  5. 16(4):689e712. 26. Jay RM, Malay DS, Lansman AS, Jennato N, Huish J, Younger M. Dual-Compo-nent intramedullary implant versus Kirschner wire for proximal interphalan-geal joint fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016
  6. 55(4):697e708. 25. Holewski JJ, Moss KM, Stess RM, Graf PM, Grunfeld C. Prevalence of foot pathology and lower extremity complications in a diabetic outpatient clinic. J Rehabil Res Develop. 1989
  7. 26(3):35e44. 24. Coughlin MJ. Lesser toe deformities. In: Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Slatzman CL, eds. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Philadelphia Mosby Elsevier
  8. 363e464. 23. Sim-Fook L, Hodgson AR. A comparison of foot forms among the non shoe and shoe wearing Chinese population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958
  9. 40(5): 1058e1062. 22. Thompson FM, Coughlin MJ. The high price of high-fashion footwear. J Bone Joiny Surg Am. 1994
  10. 76(10):1586e1593. 21. Kato T, Watanabe S. The etiology of hallux valgus in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981
  11. :78e81. 20. Shine IB. Incidence of Hallux valgus in a partially shoe-wearing community. Br Med J. 1965
  12. 1(5451):1648e1650. 19. Cho NH, Kim S, Kwon DJ, Kim HA. The prevalence of hallux valgus and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009
  13. 91(4):494e498. 18. Roddy E, Zhang W, Doberty M. Prevalance and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008
  14. 59(6):857e862. 17. Hannan MT, Menz HB, Jordan JM, Adrienne Cupples L, Cheng C-H, Hsu Y-H. Hallux valgus and lesser toe deformities are highly heritable in adult men and women: the Framingham foot study. Arthritis Care Res. 2013
  15. 65(9):1515e1521. 16. D. Wu, L. Louie Does wearing high-heeled shoe cause hallux valgus ? A survey of 1,056 Chinese Females Foot Ankle Online J, 3 (5) (2016), p. 3 15. The Results of Address Based Population Registration System (2015) http://www.tuik.gov.tr/HbGetirHTML.do?id=21507 14. S. Nix, M. Smith, B. Vicenzino Prevalence o