SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bozok Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Defense Strategies Against Biotic Stresses in Wheat: Molecular and Physiological Approaches

Buğdayda Biyotik Streslere Karşı Savunma Stratejileri: Moleküler ve Fizyolojik Yaklaşımlar

Çağdaş Can Toprak(SIIRT UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE)0000-0002-0951-7458
Zeki Erden(SİİRT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1613-7768
Pages
101–111
Publication Date
2025-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the present study examines the defense mechanisms of wheat against biotic stresses and suggests that future research aimed at a deeper understanding of wheat immune pathways will contribute to the development of more resilient and high-yielding cultivars, thereby supporting global food security.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Wheat is a major staple crop whose growth and yield are substantially constrained by biotic stress factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The defense mechanisms of wheat against biotic stresses are generally categorized into pre-existing (constitutive) and induced (inducible) defense strategies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the present study examines the defense mechanisms of wheat against biotic stresses and suggests that future research aimed at a deeper understanding of wheat immune pathways will contribute to the development of more resilient and high-yielding cultivars, thereby supporting global food security.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Buğday · biyotik stres · genetik ıslah

Abstract

Wheat is a major staple crop whose growth and yield are substantially constrained by biotic stress factors. The defense mechanisms of wheat against biotic stresses are generally categorized into pre-existing (constitutive) and induced (inducible) defense strategies. Constitutive defenses comprise physical barriers (cuticle, cell wall) and chemical compounds (such as phenolic compounds and phytoalexins), whereas induced defenses encompass dynamic responses including pathogen recognition, the hypersensitive response (HR), systemic acquired resistance (SAR), and the regulation of plant defense hormones. To enhance wheat resilience to biotic stresses, breeding programs, biotechnological approaches and integrated disease management strategies are widely employed. Gene-editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9 offer the potential to develop resistant cultivars, while sustainable agricultural practices also play a critical role in the management of diseases and pests. In this context, the present study examines the defense mechanisms of wheat against biotic stresses and suggests that future research aimed at a deeper understanding of wheat immune pathways will contribute to the development of more resilient and high-yielding cultivars, thereby supporting global food security.

Özet

Buğday, biyotik stres faktörleri nedeniyle büyüme ve verim kaybı yaşayabilen temel bir tarım ürünüdür. Buğdayın biyotik streslere karşı savunma mekanizmaları, önceden var olan (konstitütif) ve uyarılmış (indüklenmiş) savunma stratejileri olarak ikiye ayrılmaktadır. Konstitütif savunmalar, fiziksel bariyerler (kutikula, hücre duvarı) ve kimyasal bileşiklerden (fenolik bileşikler, fitoaleksinler) oluşurken, uyarılmış savunmalar patojen tanıma, hipersensitif tepki (HR), sistemik edinilmiş direnç (SAR) ve bitkisel savunma hormonları gibi dinamik tepkileri içermektedir. Buğdayın biyotik streslere karşı dayanıklılığını artırmak için genetik ıslah, biyoteknolojik yaklaşımlar ve entegre hastalık yönetimi stratejileri uygulanmaktadır. CRISPR/Cas9 gibi gen düzenleme teknikleri ile dirençli çeşitler geliştirilebilirken, sürdürülebilir tarım uygulamaları da hastalık ve zararlı kontrolünde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda araştırmamızda buğdayın biyotik streslere karşı savunma mekanizmaları ele alınmış ve gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalar, buğdayın bağışıklık mekanizmalarının daha iyi anlaşılmasını sağlayarak, küresel gıda güvenliği açısından daha dayanıklı ve verimli çeşitlerin geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunacağı düşünülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Toprak, Ç. C., Erden, Z. (2025). Defense Strategies Against Biotic Stresses in Wheat: Molecular and Physiological Approaches. Bozok Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.59128/bojans.1745776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant pathology (5th ed.). Academic Press.
  2. Ahuja, I., Kissen, R., and Bones, A. M. (2012). Phytoalexins in defense against pathogens. Trends in Plant Science, 17(2), 73–90.
  3. An, C., Mou, Z. (2011). Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 53(6), 412–428.
  4. Baker, C. J., Orlandi, E. W. (2018). The role of constitutive plant defenses in the management of pests and pathogens. Plant Disease, 102(9), 1803–1812.
  5. Ballot, A., Gaucher, M., Rey, M., Brisset, M. N., Joly, P., Dreux-Zigha, A., and Prigent-Combaret, C. (2025). Strong elicitation of plant defense pathways by foliar and collar inoculations of wheat with the Bacillus pumilus strain JM79. Current Plant Biology, 100524.
  6. Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., and Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012). The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science, 17(8), 478–486.
  7. Bellincampi, D., Cervone, F., and Lionetti, V. (2014). Plant cell wall dynamics and wall-related susceptibility in plant–pathogen interactions. Frontiers in plant science, 5, 228.
  8. Bhuiyan, N. H., Selvaraj, G., Wei, Y., and King, J. (2009). Role of lignification in plant defense. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 4(2), 158–159.
  9. Boller, T., Felix, G. (2009). A renaissance of elicitors: Perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 60, 379–406.
  10. Boller, T., He, S. Y. (2009). Innate immunity in plants: An arms race between pattern recognition receptors in plants and microbial effectors. Science, 324(5928), 742–744.
  11. Borrelli, V. M. G., Brambilla, V., Rogowsky, P., Marocco, A., and Lanubile, A. (2018). The enhancement of plant disease resistance using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1245.
  12. Broekaert, W. F., Delauré, S. L., De Bolle, M. F., and Cammue, B. P. (2006). The role of ethylene in host-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 44(1), 393-416.
  13. Buchholz, A., Schmidt, J. (2016). The impact of phenolic compounds on herbivore feeding behavior and the defense mechanisms of plants. Phytochemical Reviews, 15(4), 853–863.
  14. Cheynier, V., Guyot, S. (2014). Phenolic compounds and their role in the defense of plants. Phytochemistry Reviews, 13(2), 417–438.
  15. Chisholm, S. T., Coaker, G. (2006). Host-microbe interactions: Early signals in the defense response. Trends in Plant Science, 11(6), 243–249.
  16. Coll, N. S., Epple, P. D. J. L., and Dangl, J. L. (2011). Programmed cell death in the plant immune system. Cell Death & Differentiation, 18(8), 1247-1256.
  17. Durrant, W. E., Dong, X. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 42(1), 185–209.
  18. Dodds, P. N., Rathjen, J. P. (2010). Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(8), 539-548.
  19. Figueroa, M., Hammond-Kosack, K. E., and Solomon, P. S. (2018). A review of wheat diseases: Pathogen biology, molecular interactions and resistance mechanisms. Molecular Plant Pathology, 19(6), 1523–1536.
  20. Freeman, B. C., Beattie, G. A. (2008). An overview of plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. The Plant Health Instructor.
  21. Frey, M., Schullehner, K., Dick, R., Fiesselmann, A., and Gierl, A. (2009). Benzoxazinoid biosynthesis, a model for evolution of secondary metabolic pathways in plants. Phytochemistry, 70(15-16), 1645-1651.
  22. Fu, Z. Q., Dong, X. (2013). Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annual review of plant biology, 64(1), 839-863.
  23. Glazebrook, J. (2005). Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 43(1), 205–227.
  24. Hammond-Kosack, K. E., Jones, J. D. (2000). Responses to plant pathogens. Advances in Botanical Research, 34, 175–234.
  25. Hossain, M. M., Sultana, F., Mostafa, M., Khan, I., Tran, L. S. P., and Mostofa, M. G. (2025). Reinforced Defenses: R-Genes, PTI, and ETI in Modern Wheat Breeding for Blast Resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(20), 10078.
  26. Jones, J. D., and Dangl, J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature, 444(7117), 323–329.
  27. Kumar, D., Singh, P., and Chakraborty, S. (2020). Plant immune responses against fungal pathogens: Implication of stress induced gene and its regulation. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 15(4), 175–186.
  28. Li, G., Yen, Y. (2008). Jasmonate and ethylene signaling pathway may mediate Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat. Crop Science, 48(5), 1888-1896.
  29. Liu, Y., Zhang, S. (2016). The roles of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene in plant immune signaling. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 11(7), e1187759.
  30. Liu, R., Lu, J., Xing, J., Xue, L., Wu, Y., and Zhang, L. (2023). Characterization and functional analyses of wheat TaPR1 genes in response to stripe rust fungal infection. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 3362.
  31. Mahlein, A. K., Oerke, E. C., Steiner, U., and Dehne, H. W. (2012). Recent advances in sensing plant diseases for precision crop protection. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 133(1), 197–209.
  32. Mauch-Mani, B., Mauch, F. (2005). The role of salicylic acid and jasmonic acid in plant defense mechanisms: A regulatory network. Plant Biology, 7(3), 396–402.
  33. Melotto, M., Underwood, W., Koczan, J., Nomura, K., and He, S. Y. (2006). Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell, 126(5), 969-980.
  34. Mengiste, T. (2012). Plant immunity to necrotrophic pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 50, 267–292. Mithöfer, A., Boland, W. (2012). Plant defense against herbivores: Chemical aspects. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 63(1), 431–450.
  35. Morkunas, I., Różalska, S. (2014). Plant responses to pathogen infection: The role of stomata and plant defense mechanisms. Journal of Plant Physiology, 171(10), 871–883.
  36. Molina, A., Görlach, J., Volrath, S., and Ryals, J. (1999). Wheat genes encoding two types of PR-1 proteins are pathogen inducible, but do not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance. Molecular plant-microbe interactions, 12(1), 53-58.
  37. Mwadzingeni, L., Shimelis, H., Tesfay, S., and Tsilo, T. J. (2016). Screening wheat genotypes for drought tolerance using phenotypic and proline analyses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1276.
  38. Mur, L. A., Kenton, P., Lloyd, A. J., Ougham, H., and Prats, E. (2008). The hypersensitive response; the centenary is upon us but how much do we know?. Journal of experimental Botany, 59(3), 501-520.
  39. Nicholson, R. L., and Hammerschmidt, R. (1992). Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance. Annual review of phytopathology, 30(1), 369-389.
  40. Parry, D. W., Yu, Y. (2005). Biotechnology and breeding approaches for enhancing wheat's resistance to diseases. Crop Science, 45(6), 2265–2278.
  41. Peleg, Z., Blumwald, E. (2011). Gene regulation and modulation of stomatal closure under stress conditions. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6(10), 1584–1592.
  42. Pieterse, C. M. J., Van Wees, S. C. M. (2009). Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance. Plant Physiology, 146(3), 764–771.
  43. Pieterse, C. M., Van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., and Van Wees, S. C. (2014). Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 30, 491–521.
  44. Rice, E. L. (1984). Allelopathy (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
  45. Ryan, C. A. (1990). Protease inhibitors in plants: Genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 28(1), 425–449.
  46. Savary, S., Willocquet, L., Pethybridge, S. J., Esker, P., McRoberts, N., and Nelson, A. (2019). The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 3, 430–439.
  47. Schwachtje, J., Baldwin, I. T. (2008). Why does herbivore attack reconfigure primary metabolism?. Plant physiology, 146(3), 845-851.
  48. Shepherd, T., Wynne Griffiths, D. (2006). The effects of stress on plant cuticular waxes. New Phytologist, 171(3), 469-499.
  49. Sun, T., Yan, N., Liu, Q., Bai, T., Gao, H., and Chen, J. (2025). Re-Examination Characterization and Screening of Stripe Rust Resistance Gene of Wheat TaPR1 Gene Family Based on the Transcriptome in Xinchun 32. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(2), 640.
  50. Tariq, M., Shah, G. M. (2019). The role of constitutive defense mechanisms in wheat's resistance to biotic stress. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11(5), 175–188.
  51. Torres, M. A., Dangl, J. L. (2005). Functions of the Arabidopsis immune system. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 8(4), 364–371.
  52. Torres, M. A., Jones, J. D., and Dangl, J. L. (2006). Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant physiology, 141(2), 373-378.
  53. Vidhyasekaran, P., Muthusamy, M. (2017). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance: Mechanisms and applications in wheat disease management. Plant Pathology Journal, 33(1), 1–15.
  54. Van Loon, L. C., Pierpoint, W. S., Boller, T. H., and Conejero, V. (1994). Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 12(3), 245-264.
  55. Van Loon, L. C., Rep, M., and Pieterse, C. M. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 44(1), 135-162.
  56. Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. A., and Klessig, D. F. (2009). Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 47, 177–206.
  57. Vorwerk, S., Somerville, S., and Somerville, C. (2004). The role of plant cell wall polysaccharide composition in disease resistance. Trends in plant science, 9(4), 203-209.
  58. Wang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, P., Ding, Y., Mu, X., Liu, X., and Kang, Z. (2017). TaRar1 is involved in wheat defense against stripe rust pathogen mediated by YrSu. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 156.
  59. Wang, C., Li, B. (2018). The role of root exudates in the allelopathy of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and their potential for weed control. Plant Soil, 422(1-2), 273–284.
  60. Wasternack, C., Hause, B. (2013). Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Annals of botany, 111(6), 1021-1058.
  61. Yeats, T. H., Rose, J. K. (2013). The formation and function of plant cuticles. Plant physiology, 163(1), 5-20.
  62. Zhao, H., Zhang, Y. (2017). Genetic enhancement of constitutive defenses in wheat: Implications for improving biotic stress resistance. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 15(7), 837–850.
  63. Zimmerli, L., Mauch, F. (2000). Induced systemic resistance in plants: An overview. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 13(7), 1–13.