Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Total endovascular aortic arch repair using chimney and periscope grafts for treatment of ruptured aortic arch pseudoaneurysm

Pages
328–330
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this report, we present a 58-year-old male patient who has a ruptured saccular aortic arch pseudoaneurysm treated by endovascular approach using parallel grafts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aortic arch pseudoaneurysms are rare but quite fatal when ruptured.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Owing to its less morbidity and mortality compared with the surgical approach, endovascular and hybrid treatment methods are increasingly preferred.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this report, we present a 58-year-old male patient who has a ruptured saccular aortic arch pseudoaneurysm treated by endovascular approach using parallel grafts.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aortic arch pseudoaneurysms are rare but quite fatal when ruptured. Owing to its less morbidity and mortality compared with the surgical approach, endovascular and hybrid treatment methods are increasingly preferred. In this report, we present a 58-year-old male patient who has a ruptured saccular aortic arch pseudoaneurysm treated by endovascular approach using parallel grafts.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANYİĞİT, M., ERDOĞAN, K. E., ATEŞ, Ö. F., YUCE, G., HIDIROĞLU, M. (2019). Total endovascular aortic arch repair using chimney and periscope grafts for treatment of ruptured aortic arch pseudoaneurysm. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 328–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/160967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Strauch JT, Spielvogel D, Lansman SL, Lauten AL, Bodian C, Griepp RB. Long-term integrity of teflon felt-supported suture lines in aortic surgery. Annals Thorac Surg 2005; 79:796–800. [CrossRef] 2. Li Y, Hu Z, Wang J, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Zhang H. Endovascular chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals Vasc Surg 2018; 47:305–315. [CrossRef] 3. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/ SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. Circulation 2010; 121:e266–369. [CrossRef] 4. Ahmad W, Mylonas S, Majd P, Brunkwall JS. A current systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of chimney graft technology in aortic arch diseases. J Vasc Surg 2017; 66:1602–1610. [CrossRef] 5. Greenberg RK, Clair D, Srivastava S, et al. Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg 2003; 38:990–996. [CrossRef] 6. Lindblad B, Jabr AB, Holst J, Malina M. Chimney grafts in aortic stent grafting: hazardous or useful technique? Systematic review of current data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50:722– 731. [CrossRef] 7. Shahverdyan R, Mylonas S, Gawenda M, Brunkwall J. Single-center mid-term experience with chimney-graft technique for the preservation of flow to the supra-aortic branches. Vascular 2018; 26:175–182. [CrossRef] 8. Küçüker A, Hıdıroğlu M, Çetin L, et al. The results of carotid-subclavian bypass in a single institute. Turkish J Vasc Surg 2013; 22:285–291. [CrossRef]