SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Mühendislik Tasarım ve Teknoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

An examination of the correlation between spatial belonging and team ıdentification as determinants of athletic performance

Sportif performansın belirleyicisi olarak mekânsal aidiyet ve takım özdeşleşmesi arasındaki korelasyonun incelenmesi

Betül Halime Uzunay(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BURDUR MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-1007-6389
Latif Gürkan Kaya(BURDUR MEHMET AKİF ERSOY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8033-1480
Pages
8–15
Publication Date
2026-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the study reveals—at both theoretical and practical levels—that socio-physical arrangements in sporting environments should be managed as a strategic element to maximize athletic success by strengthening the bond of belonging.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research aims to investigate the ontological origins of athletes' sense of belonging and its decisive role in sporting performance outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings demonstrate that a sense of belonging is positively and statistically significantly correlated with motivational orientations, psychological resilience, and self-perceived performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the study reveals—at both theoretical and practical levels—that socio-physical arrangements in sporting environments should be managed as a strategic element to maximize athletic success by strengthening the bond of belonging.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aidiyet duygusu · mekânsal deneyim · motivasyon

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the ontological origins of athletes' sense of belonging and its decisive role in sporting performance outcomes. Within the scope of the study, the phenomenon of belonging is subjected to a multi-layered analysis along the axes of intra-team social dynamics, coach-athlete interaction, organizational culture, and spatial experience. Using a quantitative research methodology, data were collected from athletes across various disciplines via surveys and analyzed using statistical methods. The findings demonstrate that a sense of belonging is positively and statistically significantly correlated with motivational orientations, psychological resilience, and self-perceived performance. Furthermore, it was determined that a supportive social ecosystem and optimized spatial conditions are primary factors that reinforce a sense of belonging. In conclusion, the study reveals—at both theoretical and practical levels—that socio-physical arrangements in sporting environments should be managed as a strategic element to maximize athletic success by strengthening the bond of belonging.

Özet

Bu araştırma, sporcuların aidiyet hissinin ontolojik kökenlerini ve söz konusu hissin sportif performans çıktıları üzerindeki belirleyici rolünü incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Çalışma kapsamında aidiyet olgusu, takım içi sosyal dinamikler, antrenör-sporcu etkileşimi, kurumsal kültür ve mekânsal deneyim boyutları ekseninde çok katmanlı bir analize tabi tutulmuştur. Nicel araştırma metodolojisinin benimsendiği çalışmada, veriler farklı branşlardaki sporculardan anket tekniğiyle derlenmiş ve istatistiksel analiz yöntemleriyle test edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, aidiyet duygusunun motivasyonel yönelimler, psikolojik dayanıklılık ve öz-algılanan performans ile istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı ve pozitif bir korelasyon içerisinde olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, destekleyici sosyal ekosistemin ve optimize edilmiş mekânsal koşulların aidiyet hissiyatını pekiştiren birincil değişkenler olduğu saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, çalışma spor ortamlarındaki sosyo-fiziksel düzenlemelerin aidiyet bağını güçlendirerek sportif başarıyı maksimize eden stratejik bir unsur olarak yönetilmesi gerektiğini kuramsal ve pratik düzeyde ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzunay, B. H., Kaya, L. G. (2026). An examination of the correlation between spatial belonging and team ıdentification as determinants of athletic performance. Uluslararası Mühendislik Tasarım ve Teknoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.70669/ijedt.1910892

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Ahn, M.Y., Davis, H.H. (2018). Four domains of students’ sense of belonging to university. Bangor University.
  2. Allen, K.A., Kern, M.L., Rozek, C.S., McInerney, D.M., Slavich, G.M. (2021). Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1): 1-18.
  3. Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity (J. Howe, Trans.). Verso.
  4. Bale, J. (1994). Landscapes of Modern Sport. Leicester University Press.
  5. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3): 497-529.
  6. Bettencourt, G.M. (2021). “I belong because it wasn’t made for me”: Understanding working-class students’ sense of belonging on campus. The Journal of Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1872288 (Erişim Tarihi: 14.03.2026).
  7. Brewer, B.W., Van Raalte, J.L., Linder, D.E. (1993). Athletic identity: Hercules’ muscles or Achilles heel? International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24(2): 237–254.
  8. Carron, A.V., Brawley, L.R. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1): 89–106.
  9. Carron, A.V., Bray, S.R., Eys, M.A. (2002). Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(2): 119–126.
  10. Carron, A.V., Hausenblas, H.A., Eys, M.A. (2005). Group Dynamics in Sport (3rd ed.). Fitness Information Technology.
  11. Coakley, J. (2015). Sports in Society: Issues and Controversies (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  12. Crane, J., Temple, V. (2015). A systematic review of dropout from organized sport among children and youth. European Physical Education Review, 21(1): 114–131.
  13. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3): 182–185.
  14. Fletcher, D., Sarkar, M. (2012). A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(5): 669–678.
  15. Gopalan, M., Linden-Carmichael, A., Lanza, S. (2022). College students’ sense of belonging and mental health amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Adolescent Health, 70(2): 228-233.
  16. Gustafsson, H., Kenttä, G., Hassmén, P. (2011). Athlete burnout: An integrated model and future research directions. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(1): 3–24.
  17. Jowett, S. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3+1Cs in the coach–athlete relationship. In: Social Psychology in Sport. Jowett, S., Lavallee, D. (Eds.), Human Kinetics, pp. 15–27.
  18. Jowett, S., Cockerill, I.M. (2003). Olympic medallists’ perspective of the athlete–coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4): 313–331.
  19. Kaya, L. G. (2005). The environmental concerns of Turkish community in Syracuse, New York. In Z. Cebeci, A. Sideridis, S. M. Say, & N. Darcan (Eds.), ITAFE ‘05: Proceedings of the International Congress on Information Technology in Agriculture, Food and Environment (pp. 745-750). Çukurova University.
  20. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3): 207–230.
  21. Liu, G., Li, S., Kong, F. (2022). Association between sense of belonging and loneliness among the migrant elderly following children in Jinan, Shandong Province, China: The moderating effect of migration pattern. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4396).
  22. Manzo, L.C., Devine-Wright, P. (Eds.). (2014). Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. Routledge.
  23. Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row.
  24. Peacock, S., Cowan, J., Irvine, M., Williams, J. (2020). An exploration into the importance of a sense of belonging for online learners. Online Learning, 24(1): 22-35.
  25. Pedler, M.L., Willis, R., Nieuwoudt, J.E. (2021). A sense of belonging at university: Student retention, motivation and enjoyment. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1): 1-13.
  26. Rees, T., Hardy, L., Güllich, A., Abernethy, B., Côté, J., Woodman, T., Laing, S., Warr, C. (2016). The great British medalists project: A review of current knowledge on the development of the world’s best sporting talent. Sports Medicine, 46(8): 1041–1058.
  27. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. Pion.
  28. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1): 54–67.
  29. Scannell, L., Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 1–10.
  30. Sheller, M., Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2): 207–226.
  31. Standage, M., Duda, J.L., Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3): 411–433.
  32. Strayhorn, T.L. (2023). College Students’ Sense of Belonging: A Key to Educational Success for All Students (2nd ed.). LeMoyne-Owen College.
  33. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Austin, W.G., Worchel, S. (Eds.), Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–47.
  34. Tuan, Y.F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. University of Minnesota Press.