Journals / Uluslararası Klinik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Our Results of Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Ureteral Calculi

Pediatrik Hastalarda Üreter Taşı Tedavisinde Üreterorenoskopi Sonuçlarımız

Ercan Kazan(Kozluk Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Batman, Türkiye)
Cem Kezer(Bölge Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Batman, Türkiye)
Alaaddin Akay(Bölge Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Batman, Türkiye)
Seyfettin Örgen(Bölge Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Batman, Türkiye)
Rahmi Aslan(Özel Tatvan Can Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Bitlis)
Mustafa Cengiz Zaman(Bölge Devlet Hastanesi, Üroloji Kliniği, Batman, Türkiye)
Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2016-07-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results supports the idea that this surgery can be performed by experienced surgeon seven in secondary care centers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate there sults of ureterorenoscopy (URS) that performe in a regional state hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We retrospectively analyzed 48 URS performed cases that treated at our clinic between February 2011 and January 2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results supports the idea that this surgery can be performed by experienced surgeon seven in secondary care centers.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çocuk hasta · üreter taşı · üreterolitiyazis

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate there sults of ureterorenoscopy (URS) that performe in a regional state hospital. We retrospectively analyzed 48 URS performed cases that treated at our clinic between February 2011 and January 2014. After necessary laboratory and radiological investigations, we performed URS for the patients those diagnosed as having stones needed surgery. After surgery, we investigated radiologically whether residual Stone fragments remained or not. Operative time, intraoperative or postoperative complications, ureteral stents were evaluated. Of the totally 48 patients (19 girls, 29 boys) underwent URS at our clinic. The mean age was13.4 (range: 1-18) and average stone size was 8.7 mm (5-12 mm), respectively. Five of the Stones were localized in the upper ureter and others were localized in the middle or lower ureter. Stone- free rate was 84.1%. In four patients (8.3%) repeat URS was performed to retrieve residual Stones during removal of the double J stents. Three of the stones (6.3%) migrated to the kidney. Mean duration of surgery was 48 min (30–90 min). No perioperative major complication was observed. Double J stents were inserted in thirty patients (62.5%) and ureteral catheterization was performed in ten patients (20.8%). The postoperative fever was observed in four (8.3%) patients. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.4 days (1-7 days), respectively. In our country, URS in pediatric age group is one of the surgeries which are mostly preferred to be performed in tertiary care centers. Our results supports the idea that this surgery can be performed by experienced surgeon seven in secondary care centers.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ikinci basamak sağlık merkezinde çocuk hastalarda uygulanan üreterorenoskopi (URS) ile ilgili sonuçlarımızın sunulması amaçlanmıştır. Şubat 2011 ve Ocak 2014 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde URS uygulanan, yaşları 18 ve altı olan, toplam 48 hastanın dosyaları retrospektif incelendi. Gerekli laboratuar ve radyolojik tetkikler sonrasında cerrahi yapılacak hastalara URS uygulandı. Operasyon sonrası radyolojik tetkikler ile rezidü taş varlığı araştırıldı. Operasyon süresi, peroperatif veya postoperatif komplikasyon varlığı, üreteral stent kullanımı değerlendirildi. Üreter taşı tanısı ile URS yapılmış toplam 48 hastanın 19’i kız, 29’u erkek ve yaş ortalaması 13.4(1-18) idi. Ortalama taş boyutu 8.7 mm (5-12 mm) olarak saptandı. Beş hastada (%10.4) proksimal üreterde, diğerlerinde orta veya distal üreterde taş saptandı. İşlem sonrasında taşsızlık %85.4 olarak bulundu. Dört hastaya (%8.3) üreteral çift j stent çekimi sırasında tekrar URS yapıldı ve taşsızlık sağlandı. Böbreğe taş migrasyonu ise üç hastada (%6.3) oldu. Operasyon süresi ortalama 48 dakika (30-90 dakika) olarak saptandı. Peroperatif majör komplikayon gözlenmedi. İşlem sonunda, 30 hastaya (%62.5) üreteral çift j stent ve 10 hastaya (%20.8)üreter kateteri yerleşirildi. Postoperatif dört hastada (%8.3) ateş saptandı. Postoperatif ortalama hastanede kalış süresi 1.4 gün (1-7 gün) olarak saptandı. Ülkemizde genellikle üçüncü basamak sağlık merkezlerinde yapılmasına karşın deneyimli ikinci basamak merkezlerde de pediatrik hasta grubunda URS’nin yapılabileceği kanaatindeyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kazan, E., Kezer, C., Akay, A., Örgen, S., Aslan, R., Zaman, M. C. (2016). Our Results of Ureterorenoscopy in the Treatment of Pediatric Ureteral Calculi. Uluslararası Klinik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/1605510

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Menon M, Resnick MI. Urinary Lithiasis: etiology, epidemiyology and pathogenesis. Alan J. Wein (Editor in chief) Campell’s Urology. 9. Baskı, 2. Cilt, 42. Bölüm. Saunders, 2007
  2. Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E, et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey. I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Urol Res 2011;39:309-314.
  3. Matlaga BR, Assimos DG. Changing indications of open Stone surgery. Urology 2002;59:490-494. 4. Ünsal A. Çocuk hastalarda perkütan nefrolitotomi. Endoüroloji Bülteni 2008;4:1-6.
  4. Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Nita G, Mirciulescu V, CauniV. Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience. J Endourol 2006;20:179-185.
  5. Turna B, Nazlı O. Üreteroskopi: endikasyonları ve sonuçları. Turkish Journal of Urology 2008;34:423-430.
  6. Sancaktutar AA, Atar M, Söylemez H, et al. Üç yaş altı çocuklarda üreter taşlarının tedavisinde 4.5 F semirijit üreteroskopinin (Mini-URS) etkinliği. Turkish Journal of Urology 2011; 37: 335-340
  7. Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS Jr. Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J Urol 2001;166:538-540.
  8. Satar N, Zeren S, Bayazıt Y, Arıdoğan IA, Soyupak B, Tansuğ Z. Rigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of ureteral calculi in children. J Urol 2004;172:298-300.
  9. Tiryaki T, Azili MN, Özmert S. Ureteroscopy for treatment of ureteral stones in children: factors influencing the outcome. Urology 2013;81:1047-1051
  10. Gedik A, Orgen S, Akay AF, Sahin H, Bircan MK. Semi-rigid ureterorenoscopy in children without ureteral dilatation. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40:11-14.
  11. Tanriverdi O, Silay MS, Kendirci M, et al. Comparison of ureteroscopic procedures with rigid and semirigid ureteroscopes in pediatric population: does the caliber of instrument matter? Pediatr Surg Int 2010;26:733- 738.
  12. Turunc T, Kuzgunbay B, Gul U, et al. Factors affecting the success of ureteroscopy in management of ureteral Stone diseases in children. Endourol 2010;24:1273- 1277.
  13. Yucel S, Akin Y, Kol A, Danisman A, Guntekin E. Experience on semirigid ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy in children at a single center. World J Urol 2011;29:719-723
  14. Dogan HS, Onal B, Satar N, et al. Factors affecting complication rates of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in children: results of multi-institutional retrospective analysis by Pediatric Stone Disease Study Group of Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. J Urol 2011;186:1035-1040.
  15. Öztürk Mİ, Gürbüz C, Koca O, et al. Anadolu Yakası Taş Araştırma Grubu (AYTAG). Üreter taşı tanı ve tedavisinde güncel durum: İstanbul’dan kesitsel bir tarama. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2010;36:125-131
  16. Milliner DS, Murphy ME. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:241-248
  17. Öner A, Demircin G, İpekçioğlu H, Bülbül M, Ecin N. Etiological and clinical patterns of urolithiasis in Turkish children. Eur Urol 1997;31:453-458.
  18. Young HH, McKay RW. Congenital valvular obstruction of the prostatic urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1929;48:509.
  19. Iglesias PJI, ManceboGomez JM, Massarra HJ, Cisneros LJ, Perez Castro EE. Technics of ureteral endoscopic access. Arch Esp Urol 1995;48:813
  20. Ritchey M, Patterson DE, Kelalis PP, Segura JW. A case of pediatric ureteroscopic lasertripsy. J Urol1988;139:1272-1274.
  21. Schuster TG, Russell KY, Bloom DA, Koo HP, Faerber GJ. Ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis in children. J Urol 2002;167:1813.
  22. Ünsal A, Kara C, Bozkurt ÖF, Bayındır M, Çiçekbilek İ. İki taraflı böbrek ve üreterde sistin taşları olan 9 aylık bebekte antegrad perkütan yaklaşım. Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2009;35:56-60
  23. Doğan HS, Tekgül S, Akdoğan B, Keskin MS, Şahin A. Use of the holmium: YAG laser for ureterolithotripsy in children. BJU Int 2004;94:131-133.
  24. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, Adams MC, BrockJW, Pope JC. Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management. J Urol 2005;174:1072-1074.
  25. Lesani OA, Palmer JS. Retrograde proximal rigid ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy in prepubertal children: safe and effective. J Urol 2006;176:1570-1573.
  26. Karakus OZ, Ates O, Hakgüder G, Akgür FM, Olguner M. Çocukluk çağı üriner sistem taşlarının endoskopik cerrahi yöntemlerle tedavisine ilişkin deneyimlerimiz. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;26:181-188
  27. Herndon CD, Viamonte L, Joseph DB. Ureteroscopy in children: is there a need for ureteral dilation and postoperative stenting? J Pediatr Urol 2006;2:290-293.
  28. Haleblian G, Kijvikai K, De la Rosette J, et al. Ureteral stenting and urinary Stone management: a systematic review. J Urol 2008;179:424-430
  29. Galal EM, Fath El-Bab TK, Abdelhamid AM. Outcome of ureteroscopy for treatment of pediatric ureteral stones. J Pediatr Urol 2013;9:476-478
  30. Altıntaş R, Beytur A, Oğuz F,Çimen F, et al. Minimally invasive approaches and their efficacy in pediatric urolithiasis. Turkish Journal of Urology 2013;39:111- 115