Journals / Ağrı / 2014 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Comparison the effects of prilocaine and the addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine for intravenous regional anesthe

İntravenöz rejyonel anestezi tekniğinde prilokain, prilokaine eklenen deksketoprofen ve deksametazonun etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılmas

Journal
Ağrı
Pages
65–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine during IVRA improves the quality of both anesthesia and analgesia moreover dexketoprofen provides beter postoperative analgesia during the first 24 hour after surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic and analgesic effects of prilocaine alone, prilocaine added dexketopro- fen and dexamethasone during intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Forty five patients undergoing forearm or hand surgery were randoml y assigned to one of three groups to receive (Group P) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine; (Group PDK) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine plus 50 mg dexketoprofen; (Group PDM) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilo- caine plus 8 mg dexamethasone in total 40 ml volume for IVRA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine during IVRA improves the quality of both anesthesia and analgesia moreover dexketoprofen provides beter postoperative analgesia during the first 24 hour after surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic and analgesic effects of prilocaine alone, prilocaine added dexketopro- fen and dexamethasone during intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Methods: Forty five patients undergoing forearm or hand surgery were randoml y assigned to one of three groups to receive (Group P) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine; (Group PDK) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilocaine plus 50 mg dexketoprofen; (Group PDM) 3 mg/kg 0.5% prilo- caine plus 8 mg dexamethasone in total 40 ml volume for IVRA. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks, hemodynamic datas, duration of analgesia and tourniquet, time to first analgesic requirement, visual analog scale (VAS), total analgesic consump- tion in 24 hours and patient satisfaction score were assessed and recorded. Results: Time to onset of sensory block was found to be longer in Group P (p<0.05), though no signi ficance was found according to sensory block recovery times amoung groups. Time to onset of motor block was found to be longer and recovery time of motor block was found to be shorter in Group P (p<0.05). Time to first analgesic requirement was found to be longer in Group PDK,and was found to be high in Group PDM than Group PDK(p<0.05). The VAS scores was found to be high and patient satisfaction scale was found to be low in Group P (p<0.05). Conclusion: The addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine during IVRA improves the quality of both anesthesia and analgesia moreover dexketoprofen provides beter postoperative analgesia during the first 24 hour after surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada intravenöz rejyonel anestezide (IVRA) prilokain ve buna eklenen deksketoprofen ve deksametazonun anestezik ve analjezik etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: El ve el bileği cerrahisi geçirecek 18-60 yaş, ASA I-II 45 olgu rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı. Grup P’ye 3 mg/ kg %0.5 prilokain, Grup PDK’ya 3 mg/kg %0.5 prilokain ile 50 mg deksketoprofen, Grup PDM’ye 3 mg/kg %0.5 prilokain ile 8 mg deksametazon total 40 ml verildi. Duyusal ve motor blok başlama ve dönüş zamanları, hemodinamik veriler, analjezi süresi, turnike süresi, intraoperatif fentanil alan hasta sayısı, ilk analjezik zamanı, vizüel analog skala (VAS), 24 saat analjezik tüketimi ve hasta memnuniyet skorları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Duyusal blok başlama zamanı Grup P’ de uzun bulunurken, motor blok başlama zamanı daha uzun ve motor blok dönme zamanı daha kısa bulundu (p<0.05). Duyusal blok dönme zamanları açısından üç grup arasında anlamlı fark bulun- madı. İntraoperatif turnike ağrısı başlama zamanı Grup PDM ve Grup PDK’ da daha uzun bulunurken (p<0.05), intraope- ratif fentanil ihtiyacı olan hasta sayısı Grup P’ de daha fazlaydı (p<0.05). İlk analjezi verilme zamanı Grup PDK’ da her iki gruptan uzun bulunurken (p<0.05), total analjezik tüketimi Grup P’ de diğer iki gruptan daha fazla (p<0.05), Grup PDM’ de de Grup PDK’ dan fazla bulundu (p<0.05). Grup P’ de intraoperatif VAS değerleri daha yüksek (p<0.05) bulunurken, hasta memnuniyet skorları daha düşük bulundu (p<0.05). Sonuç: İntravenöz rejyonel anestezide prilokaine eklenen deksketoprofen ve deksametazonun hem analjezik hem de aneste- zik kaliteyi artırdığı ancak deksketoprofenin ameliyat sonrası ilk 24 saatte daha iyi analjezi sağladığı gösterilmiş

🔖

Cite This Article

BORAZAN, H., ŞAHİN, O., ULUER, M. S., SARITAŞ, T. B., OTELCİOĞLU, Ş., KEÇECİOĞLU, A. (2014). Comparison the effects of prilocaine and the addition of dexketoprofen and dexamethasone to prilocaine for intravenous regional anesthe. Ağrı, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 65–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/160542

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Peng PW, Coleman MM, McCartney CJ, Krone S, Chan VW, Kas- zas Z, et al. Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375% ropivacaine versus 0.5% lidocaine in forearm intravenous re- gional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002;27(6):595-9
  2. Rosenberg PH. 1992 ASRA Lecture. Intravenous regional an- esthesia: nerve block by multiple mechanisms. Reg Anesth 1993;18(1):1-5
  3. Erdine S. Rejyonel anestezi. Istanbul: Nobel tıp kitabevleri; 2007. s. 151-66
  4. Choyce A, Peng P. A systematic review of adjuncts for intra- venous regional anesthesia for surgical procedures. Can J Anaesth 2002;49(1):32-45
  5. Rodolà F, Vagnoni S, Ingletti S. An update on Intravenous Re- gional Anaesthesia of the arm. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2003;7(5):131-8
  6. Celik M, Sarıcaoglu F, Canbay O, Dal D, Uzumcugil A, Leble- bicioglu G, et al. The analgesic effect of paracetamol when added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia. Mi- nerva Anestesiol 2009;75(1):1-6
  7. Jankovic RJ, Visnjic MM, Milic DJ, Stojanovic MP, Djordjevic DR, Pavlovic MS. Does the addition of ketorolac and dexa- methasone to lidocaine intravenous regimprove postoperative analgesia and tourniquet toler- ance for ambulatory hand surgery? Minerva Anestesiol 2008;74(10):521-7
  8. Sen S, Ugur B, Aydin ON, Ogurlu M, Gezer E, Savk O. The an- algesic effect of lornoxicam when added to lidocaine for in- travenous regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2006;97(3):408- 13
  9. Bigat Z, Boztug N, Hadimioglu N, Cete N, Coskunfirat N, Ertok E. Does dexamethasone improve the quality of intravenous regional anesthesia and analgesia? A randomized, controlled clinical study. Anesth Analg 2006;102(2):605-9
  10. Tuncer S, Tavlan A, Köstekçi H, Reisli R, Otelcioğlu S. Postop- eratif ağrida deksketoprofen kullanimi. Agri 2006;18(3):30-5
  11. Jamdade PT, Porwal A, Shinde JV, Erram SS, Kamat VV, Karmarkar PS, et al. Efficacy and Tolerability of Intramus- cular Dexketoprofen in Postoperative Pain Management following Hernia Repair Surgery. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011;2011:579038
  12. Tuncer S, Reisli R, Keçecioğlu M, Erol A. The effects of intra- venous dexketoprofen on postoperative analgesia and mor- phine consumption in patients undergoing abdominal hys- terectomy. Agri 2010;22(3):98-102
  13. Jokela RM, Ahonen JV, Tallgren MK, Marjakangas PC, Korttila KT. The effective analgesic dose of dexamethasone after lap- aroscopic hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;109(2):607-15
  14. Stein A, Yassouridis A, Szopko C, Helmke K, Stein C. Intraar-