SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

The Intellectual Map of Food Waste Research in the HoReCa Sector: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis

HoReCa Sektöründe Gıda İsrafı Araştırmalarının Entelektüel Haritası: Sistematik Bibliyometrik Analiz

Ayşe Nur Songür Bozdağ(İZMİR KATİP ÇELEBİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6412-8650
Pages
121–141
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study provides a data-driven account of the post-SDG transformation of the field, documenting its paradigm shift from simple disposal to value creation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this research study is to map the intellectual and social structure of food waste in the HoReCa sector for the period 2015-2025 after the SDG 12.3.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Reviewing the 358 articles that meet the selection criteria obtained through Systematic Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus Database The performance analysis deals with impact analysis (publication trends, productivity, and impact), network analysis (country, institution and author), and content analysis (co-occurrence of keywords and thematic clusters).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study provides a data-driven account of the post-SDG transformation of the field, documenting its paradigm shift from simple disposal to value creation.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015-2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gıda İsrafı · HoReCa · Bibliyometrik Analiz

Abstract

The objective of this research study is to map the intellectual and social structure of food waste in the HoReCa sector for the period 2015-2025 after the SDG 12.3. Reviewing the 358 articles that meet the selection criteria obtained through Systematic Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus Database The performance analysis deals with impact analysis (publication trends, productivity, and impact), network analysis (country, institution and author), and content analysis (co-occurrence of keywords and thematic clusters). The data shows that there was a significant increase in the number of publications from 2018 due to policy momentum of SDG 12.3. US and UK remained the most productive countries while the journals Sustainability, Waste Management and the Journal of Cleaner Production were the most impactful journals. The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences yielded the highest impact at the institutional level, while the author-level impact was led by V. Filimonau. The United Kingdom plays a central bridging role in international collaboration, confirmed the network analyses. Thematic analysis reveals that the intellectual structure of the field has evolved into a multi-level framework organized around three distinct dimensions: (i) behavioral drivers (consumer perception and psycho-social determinants), (ii) strategic sustainability (circular economy and waste valorization), and (iii) sectoral specialization (institutional settings like schools and hospitals). This study provides a data-driven account of the post-SDG transformation of the field, documenting its paradigm shift from simple disposal to value creation.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 2015–2025 döneminde Birleşmiş Milletler Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amacı (SKA) 12.3’ün kabulü sonrasında HoReCa sektöründe gıda atığı araştırmalarının entelektüel ve sosyal yapısını haritalandırmak amaçlanmıştır. Sistematik bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle, seçilen kriterlere uyan 358 makale Scopus veritabanından elde edilen veriler doğrultusunda incelenmiştir. Veri analizinde performans analizi (yayın eğilimleri, üretkenlik ve etki ölçütleri), ağ analizi (ülke, kurum ve yazar işbirlikleri) ve içerik analizi (anahtar kelime birlikte görülme ve tematik kümelenme) yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, 2018’den itibaren SKA 12.3’ün politik etkisiyle yayın sayısında belirgin bir artış olduğunu göstermektedir. ABD ve Birleşik Krallık en üretken ülkeler olarak öne çıkarken; Sustainability, Waste Management ve Journal of Cleaner Production en etkili dergiler olarak belirlenmiştir. Kurumsal düzeyde ise Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences en yüksek etkiyi göstermiş, yazar düzeyinde V. Filimonau öne çıkmıştır. Ağ analizleri, uluslararası işbirliği bağlamında Birleşik Krallık’ın merkezi ve köprüleyici rolünü ortaya koymuştur. Tematik analiz, bu alanın entelektüel yapısının üç farklı boyut etrafında organize edilmiş çok düzeyli bir çerçeveye dönüştüğünü ortaya koymaktadır: (i) davranışsal etkenler (tüketici algısı ve psiko-sosyal belirleyiciler), (ii) stratejik sürdürülebilirlik (döngüsel ekonomi ve atık değerlendirme) ve (iii) sektörel uzmanlaşma (okullar ve hastaneler gibi kurumsal ortamlar). Bu çalışma, alanın SDG sonrası dönüşümünü veriye dayalı bir şekilde ele almakta ve basit bertaraf işleminden değer yaratmaya doğru olan paradigma değişimini belgelemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozdağ, A. N. S. (2025). The Intellectual Map of Food Waste Research in the HoReCa Sector: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis. Uluslararası Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.30625/ijctr.1811110

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
  2. Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
  3. Betz, A., Buchli, J., Göbel, C., & Müller, C. (2015). Food waste in the Swiss food service industry–Magnitude and potential for reduction. Waste Management, 35, 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.015
  4. Buczacki, A., Gładysz, B., & Palmer, E. (2021). HoReCa food waste and sustainable development goals—A systemic view. Sustainability, 13(10), 5510. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105510
  5. Champions 12.3. (2025). SDG target 12.3 on food loss and waste: 2025 progress report. World Resources Institute. https://champions123.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/champions-12-3-2025-progress-report.pdf
  6. Coşkun, A., & Özbük, R. M. Y. (2020). What influences consumer food waste behavior in restaurants? An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Waste Management, 117, 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.011
  7. de Peyrelongue, M., Chansomphou, V., Sisavath, V., & Saysanavongphet, V. (2024, March 12). Food waste study in the HoReCa sector in Vientiane and Vang Vieng, Lao PDR. Swisscontact. https://www.swisscontact.org/_Resources/Persistent/f/e/a/5/fea55543f2bba1c8ce235a04f58d6e144426cb00/Food%20Waste%20Study%20HORECA%20Final.pdf
  8. Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., & Malibari, A. (2020). Food waste in hospitality and food services: A systematic literature review and framework development approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122861
  9. Ding Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.008
  10. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  11. Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809-1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
  12. Eriksson, M., Osowski, C. P., Malefors, C., Björkman, J., & Eriksson, E. (2017). Quantification of food waste in public catering services–A case study from a Swedish municipality. Waste Management, 61, 415-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.035
  13. Fasting, A. M. (2019). Global food waste and the Netherlands: Steps towards accomplishing SDG’s target 12.3. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Geografia, 88, 143-162. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/TreballsSCGeografia/article/download/372785/466357/537151
  14. Filimonau, V., & Delysia, A. (2019). Food waste management in hospitality operations: A critical review. Tourism Management, 71, 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.009
  15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2011). Global food losses and food waste: Extent, causes and prevention. FAO.
  16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2013, September 11). Food waste harms climate, water, land and biodiversity – new FAO report. FAO. https://www.fao.org/newsroom/detail/Food-waste-harms-climate-water-land-and-biodiversity-new-FAO-report/en
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2015). Food loss and waste in the food supply chain: Teaching guide for students aged 12–15. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/bb144e
  18. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2018). Food loss and waste and the right to adequate food: Making the connection. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/CA1397EN/ca1397en.pdf
  19. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2019). The state of food and agriculture 2019: Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/11f9288f-dc78-4171-8d02-92235b8d7dc7/content
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2024). The state of food and agriculture 2024: Value-driven transformation of agrifood systems. FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/bitstreams/f0ae2b1e-f24c-4847-b1d5-0ce182b298f1/download
  21. Handoyo, M., & Asri, N. (2023). Study on food loss and food waste: Conditions, impact and solutions. AGRITEPA: Jurnal Ilmu Dan Teknologi Pertanian, 10(2), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.37676/agritepa.v10i2.4579
  22. Heikkilä, L., Reinikainen, A., Katajajuuri, J. M., Silvennoinen, K., & Hartikainen, H. (2016). Elements affecting food waste in the food service sector. Waste Management, 56, 446-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.019
  23. IDB Invest. (2020, October 31). Why should the tourism sector care about food waste? https://idbinvest.org/en/blog/development-impact/why-should-tourism-sector-care-about-food-waste
  24. Jarneving, B. (2007). The outbreak of SARS mirrored by bibliometric mapping: Combining bibliographic coupling with the complete link cluster method. Studii de Biblioteconomie Şi Ştiinţa Informării, 11, 37-62.
  25. Jia, L., & Qiao, G. (2022). Quantification, environmental impact, and behavior management: A bibliometric analysis and review of global food waste research based on CiteSpace. Sustainability, 14(18), 11293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811293
  26. Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., & Schösler, H. (2016). Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability, 8(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010069
  27. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.019
  28. Lins, M., Puppin Zandonadi, R., Raposo, A., & Ginani, V. C. (2021). Food waste on foodservice: An overview through the perspective of sustainable dimensions. Foods, 10(6), 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061175
  29. Martin-Rios, C., Demen-Meier, C., Gössling, S., & Cornuz, C. (2018). Food waste management innovations in the foodservice industry. Waste Management, 79, 196-206.
  30. Nikravech, M. (2023). Perspective—Evaluating the impact of food waste reduction policies. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1170226. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1170226
  31. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  32. Papargyropoulou, E., Steinberger, J. K., Wright, N., Lozano, R., Padfield, R., & Ujang, Z. (2019). Patterns and causes of food waste in the hospitality and food service sector: Food waste prevention insights from Malaysia. Sustainability, 11(21), 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216016
  33. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
  34. Pesta, B., Fuerst, J., & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2018). Bibliometric keyword analysis across seventeen years (2000-2016) of intelligence articles. Journal of Intelligence, 6(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
  35. Pinto, R. S., dos Santos Pinto, R. M., Melo, F. F. S., Campos, S. S., & Cordovil, C. M. D. S. (2018). A simple awareness campaign to promote food waste reduction in a university canteen. Waste Management, 76, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.044
  36. Pirani, S. I., & Arafat, H. A. (2016). Reduction of food waste generation in the hospitality industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.146
  37. Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
  38. Principato, L., Di Leo, A., Mattia, G., & Pratesi, C. A. (2021). The next step in sustainable dining: The restaurant food waste map for the management of food waste. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2021(3), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-021-00032-x
  39. Ramos, M. T., Medina-Salgado, M. S., & Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M. (2025). Food waste and loss management in HORECA: The 5C’s route guidance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 18(1), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.8027
  40. Sakaguchi, L., Pak, N., & Potts, M. D. (2018). Tackling the issue of food waste in restaurants: Options for measurement method, reduction and behavioral change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 430-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.136
  41. Schwartz, M. B., Henderson, K. E., Read, M., Danna, N., & Ickovics, J. R. (2015). New school meal regulations increase fruit consumption and do not increase total plate waste. Childhood Obesity, 11(3), 242-247. https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2015.0019
  42. Shasha, Z. T., Weideman, M., Sun, H., & Liu, G. (2025). A bibliometric review of research progress, trends, and updates on smart tourism research. Businesses, 5(3), 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses5030039
  43. Silvennoinen, K., Heikkilä, L., Katajajuuri, J. M., & Reinikainen, A. (2015). Food waste volume and origin: Case studies in the Finnish food service sector. Waste Management, 46, 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.010
  44. Szulecka, J., Bradshaw, C., & Principato, L. (2024). Food waste governance architectures in Europe: Actors, steering modes, and harmonization trends. Global Challenges, 8(11), 2300265. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202300265
  45. Temizel, G., Aydınlı, F., & Solak, B. B. (2024). Food waste management in all-inclusive hotels: An exploratory research in Antalya, Türkiye. Journal of Management and Economic Studies, 6(3), 245-270. https://www.jomaes.org/index.php/jomaes/article/view/150
  46. United Nations (UN). (2024, September 30). Food loss and waste account for 8–10% of annual global greenhouse gas emissions; cost USD 1 trillion annually. UNFCCC. https://unfccc.int/news/food-loss-and-waste-account-for-8-10-of-annual-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-cost-usd-1-trillion
  47. United Nations Development Programme. (2024). What are the Sustainable Development Goals? https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals
  48. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2024). Food waste index report 2024: Think Eat Save – Tracking progress to halve global food waste. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/food-waste-index-report-2024
  49. Wakil, M. A. (2024). Bibliometric and visualised review of the knowledge domain of coastal tourism research. Sustainable Communities, 1(1). https://doi.org/180.1080/29931282.2024.2360221
  50. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
  51. Wang, L. E., Liu, G., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Gao, J., Zhou, B.,. & Cheng, S. (2017). The weight of unfinished plate: A survey based characterization of restaurant food waste in Chinese cities. Waste Management, 66, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.007
  52. World Resources Institute (WRI). (2024, November 24). How much food does the world really waste? What we know — and what we don’t. WRI. https://www.wri.org/insights/how-much-food-does-the-world-waste
  53. World Tourism Organization. (2023). Global roadmap for food waste reduction in the tourism sector. UNWTO. https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284424085
  54. Yılmaz, G., & Çırak, K. (2022). Restoranlarda yiyecek israfının belirleyicileri, kaynakları ve çıktılarına ilişkin kavramsal bir model önerisi. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, 19(2), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.24010/soid.1093086
  55. Wang, L. E., Liu, G., Liu, X., Liu, Y., Gao, J., Zhou, B.,. & Cheng, S. (2017). The weight of unfinished plate: A survey based characterization of restaurant food waste in Chinese cities. Waste Management, 66, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.007