Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1

Is ACL reconstruction a prerequisite for the patients having recreational sporting activities

Pages
37–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Surgical techniques, rehabilitation,assessment of subjective knee function, one-leg hop test, assessment of joint position sense, musclestrength, and the health proŞle of the patient were evaluated.Results: Overall, 43 patients were included in Group A (mean age, 32.56± 4.89; Tegner activity scale, 5)and 39 patients in Group B (31.67± 7.27; 5).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Whether surgical or conservative treatment is more effective in allowing patients to return tophysical activity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We sought to compare midterm outcome measures between isolated ACL tear patients who underwent reconstruction followed byclosed kinetic chain exercises and those who underwent neuromuscular training only.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with ACL tears who underwent post-surgery CKCstrength training after ACL reconstruction (Group A), and patients who only underwent neuromusculartraining (Group B) with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Surgical techniques, rehabilitation,assessment of subjective knee function, one-leg hop test, assessment of joint position sense, musclestrength, and the health proŞle of the patient were evaluated.Results: Overall, 43 patients were included in Group A (mean age, 32.56± 4.89; Tegner activity scale, 5)and 39 patients in Group B (31.67± 7.27; 5).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Whether surgical or conservative treatment is more effective in allowing patients to return tophysical activity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is controversial. We sought to compare midterm outcome measures between isolated ACL tear patients who underwent reconstruction followed byclosed kinetic chain exercises and those who underwent neuromuscular training only.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with ACL tears who underwent post-surgery CKCstrength training after ACL reconstruction (Group A), and patients who only underwent neuromusculartraining (Group B) with a minimum follow-up time of 5 years. Surgical techniques, rehabilitation,assessment of subjective knee function, one-leg hop test, assessment of joint position sense, musclestrength, and the health proŞle of the patient were evaluated.Results: Overall, 43 patients were included in Group A (mean age, 32.56± 4.89; Tegner activity scale, 5)and 39 patients in Group B (31.67± 7.27; 5). Patients in both groups returned to their regular physicalactivity level after a similar time frame (Group A: average, 12 months; Group B, average, 13.4 months). Themean Lysholm knee score was 88.52± 7.65 in Group A and 86.21 ± 13.72 in Group B. Mean distances forthe one-leg hop test for Group A were 135.21± 31.66 and 145.36 ± 42.10 mm in the reconstructed anduninjured knees, respectively. In Group B, the mean hop distances were 132.47± 28.13 and147.89± 21.45 mm in the rehabilitated and uninjured knees, respectively. No statistical difference wasobserved between the groups for any of the parameters evaluated, including assessment of subjectiveknee function, one-leg hop test, assessment of joint position sense, muscle strength, and the health proŞle.Conclusion: Our data suggest that early surgical reconstruction may not be a prerequisite to returning torecreational physical activities after injury in patients with ACL tears.Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.© 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

🔖

Cite This Article

KOVALAK, E., ATAY, T., ÇETİN, C., ATAY, I. M., SERBEST, M. O. (2018). Is ACL reconstruction a prerequisite for the patients having recreational sporting activities. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 1, 37–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/160506

References (12)

  1. Tsoukas D, Fotopoulos V, Basdekis G, Makridis KG. No difference in osteoarthritis after surgical and non-surgical treatment of ACL-injured knees after 10 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Sep;24(9):2953e2959
  2. Streich NA, Zimmermann D, Bode G, Schmitt H. Reconstructive versus nonreconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop. 2011 Apr;35(4): 607e613
  3. Kessler MA, Behrend H, Henz S, Stutz G, Rukavina A, Kuster MS. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 May;16(5):442e448
  4. Linko E, Harilainen A, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S. Surgical versus conservative interventions for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2). CD001356
  5. Costa-Paz M, Ayerza MA, Tanoira I, Astoul J, Muscolo DL. Spontaneous healing in complete ACL ruptures: a clinical and MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):979e985
  6. Delince P, Gha fil D. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: conservative or surgical treatment? A critical review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Jan;20(1):48e61
  7. Kostogiannis I, Ageberg E, Neuman P, Dahlberg L, Friden T, Roos H. Activity level and subjective knee function 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective, longitudinal study of nonreconstructed patients. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jul;35(7):1135e1143
  8. Moksnes H, Risberg MA. Performance-based functional evaluation of nonoperative and operative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Jun;19(3):345e355
  9. Ageberg E, Thomee R, Neeter C, Silbernagel KG, Roos EM. Muscle strength and functional performance in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury treated with training and surgical reconstruction or training only: a two to fiveyear follow up. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Dec;59(12):1773e1779
  10. Gobbi A, Francisco R. Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Oct;14(10):1021e1028
  11. Atik OS¸. What is the role of the conservative intervention in the treatment of a torn anterior cruciate ligament? Eklem Hast Cerrahisi. 2015;26(2):97e99
  12. Smith TO, Postle K, Penny F, Mc Na