Journals / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

A retrospective evaluation of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome

Pages
103–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Age must be an important factor for prognosis and treatment choice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To determine our results by examining patient's files who we followed up by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) diagnosis between 2005 and 2009 as retrospectively and to compare the accordance of our results with literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We examined 55 patient's files who got MDS diagnosis in 4 year-term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Age must be an important factor for prognosis and treatment choice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To determine our results by examining patient's files who we followed up by myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) diagnosis between 2005 and 2009 as retrospectively and to compare the accordance of our results with literature. Methods: We examined 55 patient's files who got MDS diagnosis in 4 year-term. Complete blood count, biochemical analysis, peripheral spread, bone marrow aspiration, bone marrow biopsy examinations, cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were made for all cases. Results: Our patient's age average was 69 and when classified according to WHO criterion at the diagnosis time, % 13 (23,6) of cases got diagnosed with RA-RARS, % 29 (52,7) with RCMD-RS, %5 (9,1) with RAEB-1, % 4 (7.3) with RAEB-2, % 3 (5.5) with MDS 5q and % 1 (1.8) with secondary MDS. % 52 of the patients had normal cytogenetic structure. No relation was determined between patients’ diagnosis and international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) scores. During the 4 year-term, our 13 patients died. 6 of these cases died by reason of transforming to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 7 patients died because of infection. Mean survival time of cases that died was 6 (1-7) months as of the diagnosis date. Whereas 8 cases were over 70 ages, 5 of our cases were under 70 ages. Conclusion: MDS is a disease that ranges between anemia and AML and requires cytogenetic trials for diagnosis along bone marrow aspiration and biopsy for the purpose of determining the treatment regimen and prognosis. Determining the IPSS scores of patients by obtained outcomes is required. Risk of transforming to acute leukemia and susceptibility to infection are important in terms of mortality. Overage of patient population restricts the treatment regimens. Age must be an important factor for prognosis and treatment choice.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, T. İ., TURGUT, M. T. (2019). A retrospective evaluation of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 103–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/160326

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adès L, Itzykson R, Fenaux P. Myelodysplastic syndromes. Lancet. 2014
  2. 383(9936):2239–52. [2]List AF Doll DC. The myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Lee GR, Foerster J, Lukens J. Eds. Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology. 10th edition, Egypt: Mass Publishing Co
  3. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982
  4. 51(2):189-99. [4]Fauc൴ A, Braunwald E, Kasper D, Hauser S, Longo D, Jameson J, et al. (Eds). In: Neal S. Young. Aplastic Anemia, Myelodysplasi and Related Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine 17th edition
  5. Chapter 102. New York: McGraw-H൴ll Compan൴es, 2008. [5]Hoffman R. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 2000. p. 1118-34. [6]Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997
  6. 89(6):2079-88. [7]Romeo M, Chauffaille Mde L, Silva MR, Bahia DM, Kerbauy J. Comparison of cytogenetics with FISH in 40 myelodysplastic syndrome patients. Leuk Res. 2002
  7. 26(11):993-96. [8]Sendi HS, Hichri H, Elghezal H, Gribaa M, Laatiri A, Elloumi M, et al. Cytogenetic survey of 117 Tunisian patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome. Ann Genet. 2002
  8. 45(3):131-35. [9]Li L, Liu XP, Nie L, Yu MH, Zhang Y, Qin TJ, Xiao ZJ. Unique cytogenetic features of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in Chinese patients. Leuk Res. 2009
  9. 33(9):1194-98. [10]Steensma DP, Heptinstall KV, Johnson VM, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Camoriano JK, et al. Common troublesome symptoms and their impact on quality of life in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): results of a large internet-based survey. Leuk Res. 2008
  10. 32(5):691-98. [11]Maciejewski JP, Selleri C. Evolution of clonal cytogenetic abnormalities in aplastic anemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004
  11. 45(3):433- 40. [12]Komrokji R, Bennett JM. The myelodysplastic syndromes: classification and prognosis. Curr Hematol Rep. 2003
  12. 2(3):179-85. [13]Ohyashiki K, Nishimaki J, Shoji N, Miyazawa K, Kimura Y, Ohyashiki JH. Reevaluation of refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation. Leuk Res. 2001
  13. 25(11):933-39. [14]Breccia M, Latagliata R, Cannella L, Carmosino I, De Cuia R, Frustaci A, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in pat൴ents w൴th refractory anem൴a w൴th excess of blasts (RAEB) reclass൴f൴ed accord൴ng to WHO proposal. Leuk Res.