SavedAdd your journal

Journals / The Journal of Eurasia Sport Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

A Comparison of Physical Structure and Motoric Characteristics in Basketball by Age Categories

Çağdaş Özgür Cengizel(Gazi University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Trainer Education)0000-0001-7224-8935
Elvan Öz(Gazi University, Institute of Health Sciences)0000-0002-5239-0616
Elif Cengizel(Gazi University, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Trainer Education)0000-0001-5148-3821
Pages
10–16
Publication Date
2020-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These data provide basketball coaches with information about the physical and motoric characteristics of the specified categories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract The purpose of this study is comparing physical and motoric characteristics in youth basketball players according to age categories.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 80 male basketball players belonging to three different categories (njunior: 13, nyouth: 36, nlittle: 31) as volunteers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These data provide basketball coaches with information about the physical and motoric characteristics of the specified categories.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:basketball · speed · agility

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study is comparing physical and motoric characteristics in youth basketball players according to age categories. The study included 80 male basketball players belonging to three different categories (njunior: 13, nyouth: 36, nlittle: 31) as volunteers. Before the research, parents' consent documents were obtained from the parents of the players. In the study, body height, body weight, 20m sprint, Illinois agility test and horizontal and vertical jump tests were applied. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine the differences between categories. Measurement values that provide variance homogeneity were evaluated by Tukey statistics (p<0.05). A significant difference was found between the little team and other teams in all parameters (p<0.05). In this study, sprint, agility and jumping performance, and physical characteristics were significantly different between groups in the junior, youth and little categories. These data provide basketball coaches with information about the physical and motoric characteristics of the specified categories.

🔖

Cite This Article

Cengizel, Ç. Ö., Öz, E., Cengizel, E. (2020). A Comparison of Physical Structure and Motoric Characteristics in Basketball by Age Categories. The Journal of Eurasia Sport Sciences and Medicine, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 10–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/1601633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Bayios, I. A., Bergeles, N. K., Apostolidis, N. G., Noutsos, K. S., & Koskolou, M. D. (2006). Anthropometric, body composition and somatotype differences of Greek elite female basketball, volleyball and handball players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 46(2), 271–280.
  2. Bilim, A. S., Çetinkaya, C., & Dayı, A. (2016). Investigation of physical fitness of 12-17 years old students who engage and do not engage in sports. Journal of Sports and Performance Researches, 7(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.17155/spd.74209
  3. Canlı, U. (2017). Basketbolculara terabant ile uygulanan kuvvet antrenmanlarının motorik beceriler ve şut performansı üzerine etkisi. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 3(2), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.310970
  4. Çetinkaya, C. (2019). Farklı alt yapı kategori̇leri̇nde yer alan basketbolcularin bazı motori̇k özelli̇kleri̇ i̇le şut i̇sabetleri̇ni̇n yaş ve ci̇nsi̇yete göre karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antrenörlük Eğitimi ABD, İstanbul.
  5. Delextrat, A., & Cohen, D. (2009). Strength, power, speed, and agility of women basketball players according to playing position. Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(7), 1974–1981.
  6. Dolezajova, L., Gallova, T., & Lednicky, A. (2019). The effect of biological age in the evaluation of physical indicators and the changes in selected motoric tests of young female basketball players. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, 59(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.2478/afepuc-2019-0010
  7. Drinkwater, E. J., Pyne, D. B., & Mckenna, M. J. (2008). Design and interpretation of anthropometric and fitness testing of basketball players. Sports Medicine, 38(7), 565–578.
  8. Erčulj, F., Blas, M., Čoh, M., & Bračič, M. (2009). Differences in motor abilities of various types of European young elite female basketball players. Kinesiology, 41(2), 203–211.
  9. Erčulj, F., Dežman, B., & Vučković, G. (2003). Differences between playing positions in some motor ability tests of young female basketball players. Proceedings of 8th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science. Salzburg, Austria.
  10. Ferreira, A. E. X., & De Rose, J. (2003). Basquetebol: Técnicas e Táticas. Uma Abordagem Didático-Pedagógica.
  11. Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A., Montalvo, A., Latinjak, A., & Unnithan, V. (2016). Physical characteristics of elite adolescent female basketball players and their relationship to match performance. Journal of Human Kinetics, 53(September), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2016-0020
  12. Gencer, Y. G., & Asma, M. B. (2017). The comparison of some motoric and technic characteristics between 12 dev adam and tofas basketball schools (Van sample). European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(1), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1040342
  13. Harley, R. A., Doust, J., & Mills, S. H. (2008). Basketball. In: Winter et all (eds) Sport and Exercise Physiology Testing Guidelines Volume I: Sport Testing. London: Routledge.
  14. Jakovljević, S., Karalejić, M., Ivanović, J., Štrumbelj, E., & Erčulj, F. (2017). Efficiency of speed and agility dribbling of young basketball players. Kinesiologia Slovenica, 23(2), 22–32.
  15. Kamar, A. (2008). Sporda Yetenek Beceri ve Performans Testleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  16. Savaş, S., Yüksel, M. F., & Uzun, A. (2018). The effects of rapid strength and shooting training applied to professional basketball players on the shot percentage level. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(7), 1569–1574. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060717
  17. Savucu, Y., Polat, Y., Ramazanoğlu, F., Karahüseyinoğlu, M., & Bicer, Y. S. (2004). Alt yapıdaki küçük, yıldız ve genç basketbolcuların bazı fiziksel uygunluk parametrelerinin incelenmesi. F.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(4), 205–209.
  18. TBF. (2019). Basketbol Yerel Ligler Talimatı.
  19. Torres-Unda, J., Zarrazquin, I., Gravina, L., Zubero, J., Seco, J., Gil, S. M., … Irazusta, J. (2016). Basketball performance is related to maturity and relative age in elite adolescent players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(5), 1325–1332.
  20. Tsunawake, N., Tahara, Y., Moji, K., Muraki, S., Minova, K., & Yukawa, K. (2003). Body composition and physical fitness of female volleyball and basketball players of the Japan inter-high school championship teams. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 22, 195–201.
  21. Witkowski, K., Piepiora, P., Migasiewicz, J., Maśliński, J., & Salachna, A. (2018). Physical fitness, developmental age and somatic development of youth Greco-Roman wrestlers and school youth aged 13-14 years. Archives of Budo Science of Martial Arts and Extreme Sports, 14, 63–74.
  22. Ziv, G., & Lidor, R. (2009). Physical attributes, physiological characteristics, on-court performances and nutritional strategies of female and male basketball players. Sports Medicine, 39(7), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939070-00003
  23. Ziv, G., & Lidor, R. (2010). Vertical jump in female and male basketball players—A review of observational and experimental studies. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(3), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2009.02.009