SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psychology Research on Education and Social Sciences / 2026 / Issue: 1

Psychometric properties of the emotional self-efficacy and prosocial behavior scales among Nigerian youths: A cross-cultural validation study

Emmanuel Akaiso(IŞIK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0001-5391-0943
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the cross-cultural applicability of these instruments among Nigerian youths and highlight culturally relevant patterns in self-efficacy and prosocial functioning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the psychometric properties of the Emotional Self-Efficacy and Prosocial Behavior scales, originally developed in Italy, among Nigerian youths residing in urban and semi-urban contexts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 108 participants completed measures assessing empathic ability, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication, alongside the Prosocial Tendencies Measure, which captures helping behaviors across anonymous, public, and emotionally salient situations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the cross-cultural applicability of these instruments among Nigerian youths and highlight culturally relevant patterns in self-efficacy and prosocial functioning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Emotional self-efficacy · prosocial behavior · Nigerian Youths.

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the Emotional Self-Efficacy and Prosocial Behavior scales, originally developed in Italy, among Nigerian youths residing in urban and semi-urban contexts. A total of 108 participants completed measures assessing empathic ability, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication, alongside the Prosocial Tendencies Measure, which captures helping behaviors across anonymous, public, and emotionally salient situations. The findings demonstrated acceptable internal consistency across all scales, indicating satisfactory reliability within this cultural context. Descriptive analyses showed generally low levels of empathic and problem-solving self-efficacy, while interpersonal communication self-efficacy ranged from low to high. Correlational analyses revealed that empathic, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication self-efficacy were positively associated with prosocial behaviors, particularly in emotionally demanding contexts. Additionally, empathic and problem-solving self-efficacy were positively related to public prosocial actions. Overall, the findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the cross-cultural applicability of these instruments among Nigerian youths and highlight culturally relevant patterns in self-efficacy and prosocial functioning. The study contributes to the limited literature on psychological resources and prosocial development in Sub-Saharan Africa. Future research should employ larger and more diverse samples and explore the roles of resilience, personality traits, and value orientations in shaping prosocial behavior.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akaiso, E. (2026). Psychometric properties of the emotional self-efficacy and prosocial behavior scales among Nigerian youths: A cross-cultural validation study. Psychology Research on Education and Social Sciences, Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18162806

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Adeniji, O. G., Akanni, A. A., & Ekundayo, O. O. (2015). Gender difference in emotional labor among nurses in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Gender and Behavior, 13(1), 6527–6534.
  2. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use e-learning systems. IEEE Access, 7, 26797–26809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368
  3. Ameh, P., Afolaranmi, T., Sani, S., Nwoke, O., Ebonyi, M., & Hassan, Z. (2022). Assessment of empathy levels among medical students in a Nigerian university. Journal of Epidemiological Society of Nigeria, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7046807
  4. Azimpour, A., Neasi, A., Shehni-Yailagh, M., & Arshadi, N. (2012). Validation of “Prosocial Tendencies Measure” in Iranian university students. Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine, 2(2), 34–42.
  5. Bailey, P. E., Ebner, N. C., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2021). Introduction to the special issue on prosociality in adult development and aging: Advancing theory within a multilevel framework. Psychology and Aging, 36(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000598
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman and Company.
  8. Bartuseviciene, I., Rakauskiene, O. G., & Valackiene, A. (2023). Assessing the resilience of organizations in the context of uncertainty. Measuring Business Excellence, 27(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-05-2022-0066
  9. Bel-Fenellós, C., Biencinto-López, C., Sáenz-Rico, B., Hernández, A., Sandoval-Talamantes, A. K., Tenorio-Castaño, J., Lapunzina, P., & Nevado, J. (2023). Cognitive–behavioral profile in pediatric patients with syndrome 5p−: Genotype–phenotype correlations. Genes, 14(8), 1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14081628
  10. Caprara, G. V. (2001). La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Erickson.
  11. Caprara, G. V., & Steca, P. (2005). Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.2.191.62271
  12. Cardona-Isaza, A. de J., González Barrón, R., & Montoya-Castilla, I. (2023). Empathy and prosocial behavior in adolescent offenders: The mediating role of rational decisions. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231202844
  13. Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
  14. Chen, Z., & Yang, C. (2022). Cognitive-behavioral differences between officials and folks in China’s targeted poverty alleviation: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 916030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916030
  15. de Fátima Marcelos, M., Nagem, R. L., & Andrade, A. R. (2023). Comparative structure of similarities and differences between tree and cognitive model of cognitive behavioral theory. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 40, e220010. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e220010
  16. Dina, S. B., & Abu Sulaiman, B. (2023). Emotional regulation and its relationship to self-efficacy among academic leaders in Amman Arab University. Journal of Namibian Studies: History, Politics, Culture, 33, 565. https://doi.org/10.59670/jns.v33i.565
  17. Kauffman, D., Boruchovitch, E., & De La Fuente, J. (Eds.). (2023). Past, present and future contributions from the social cognitive theory (Albert Bandura). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-8325-3296-6
  18. Eklund, J., Loeb, C., Hansen, E. M., & Andersson-Wallin, A. C. (2012). Who cares about others? Empathic self- efficacy as an antecedent to prosocial behavior. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2(17), 31–41.
  19. El-Bassiouny, N., & El-Naggar, D. H. (2023). Flipped classroom application in an advanced research methods course: Insights from social cognitive theory and self-determination theory. International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100881
  20. Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019001001
  21. Faisal, F. (2018). The backup recovery strategy selection to maintain the business continuity plan. MATEC Web of Conferences, 229, 02001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822902001
  22. Fatikasari, H., Diel, M. M., & Farida, I. (2023). The relationship of emotional intelligence and self-esteem with self- efficacy in college students. Jurnal VNUS (Vocational Nursing Sciences), 5(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.52221/jvnus.v5i2.399
  23. Firmansyah, D. (2022). Social learning theory: Cognitive and behavioral approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik, 1(3), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.55927/jiph.v1i3.2317
  24. Getlík, P. (2023). Cognitive approach to children’s adaptations: Accepting Pinocchio. Slovenské Divadlo / The Slovak Theatre, 71(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.31577/sd-2023-0019
  25. Kago, K., & Venkataraman, P. (2023). Possibility of conjunction between altruism and egoism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 383. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02163-2
  26. Kaushal, D. S., & Singh, P. (2023). A study on resilience, emotional regulation and emotional well-being among music learners. Humanities and Social Science Studies, 12(2), 1–15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374845824
  27. Khorram-Manesh, A., Carlström, E., Burkle, F. M., Goniewicz, K., Gray, L., Ratnayake, A., Faccincani, R., Bagaria, D., Phattharapornjaroen, P., Sultan, M. A. S., Montán, C., Nordling, J., Gupta, S., & Magnusson, C. (2023). The implication of a translational triage tool in mass casualty incidents: Part three: A multinational study, using validated patient cards. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 31(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01128-3
  28. Laulié, L., Briceño-Jiménez, G., & Henríquez-Gómez, G. (2023). Exploring self-regulation theory as a mechanism of the effects of psychological contract fulfillment: The role of emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1090094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1090094
  29. Lee, Y. I., Lee, Y. J., & Bolls, P. D. (2023). Media psychophysiology and strategic communications: A scientific paradigm for advancing theory and research grounded in evolutionary psychology. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(3), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2023.2261238
  30. Luqman, A., Zhang, Q., & Hina, M. (2023). Employees’ proactiveness on enterprise social media and social consequences: An integrated perspective of social network and social exchange theories. Information and Management, 60(6), 103843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103843
  31. Mabekoje, S. O. (2008). Emotional intelligence and self-efficacy as predictors of occupational stress among academic staff in a Nigerian university. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 251–259.
  32. Nartgün, Z., & Demirer, S. (2023). Investigation of university students’ self-efficacy and problem-solving skills. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202327451
  33. Nelson, J. A., Oxley, D. R., & Kinder, D. R. (1997). Unselfishness and political behavior: Why can’t we all just get along? American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 746–768. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111676
  34. Obi, T. O. (2019). Gender differences in empathy: Evidence from students of University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Journal of Gender Studies, 28(6), 667–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2018.1479028
  35. Ojedokun, O. (2010). Self-efficacy, perceived social support, and stress as predictors of health risk behaviours among Nigerian university students. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 2(9), 170–178.
  36. Okwuduba, E. N., Ndidi, F. K., & Adebayo, O. A. (2020). Influence of academic self-efficacy on students’ achievement in mathematics: A case study of Nigerian secondary schools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5146
  37. Onuoha, J. I., & Okoro, C. N. (2018). Prosocial behaviour and empathy among Nigerian adolescents: The role of parenting styles. African Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 45–58.
  38. Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 2909.128.1.3
  39. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
  40. Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
  41. Postigo-Zegarra, S., Cejudo, J., & Losada, L. (2023). Emotional self-efficacy and prosocial behavior in adolescents: The mediating role of emotional regulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1163091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1163091
  42. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social-emotional learning: Theory, research, and practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101830
  43. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15–31). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053- 9/50003-6
  44. Siyez, D. M., & Kaya, A. (2008). The relation of perceived social support, problem solving, and self-efficacy in adolescents. Journal of Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 8(3), 829–837.
  45. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
  46. Taylor, Z. E., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., Eggum, N. D., & Sulik, M. J. (2013). The relations of ego-resiliency and emotion socialization to the development of empathy and prosocial behavior across early childhood. Emotion, 13(5), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032894
  47. Tuncer, M., & Bahadir, F. (2022). The relationship between digital literacy self-efficacy and lifelong learning tendencies of pre-service teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6011–6032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10948-w
  48. Twum-Antwi, A., Jefferies, P., & Ungar, M. (2020). Promoting child and youth resilience by strengthening home and school environments: A literature review. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 8(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2019.1660284
  49. Wang, Y., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2023). Self-efficacy and prosocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 42, 13365–13378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02355-7
  50. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801