Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2018 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4

How accurate is visual estimation of perioperative blood loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Pages
267–271
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A short training regarding optimizing the amount of blood contained in sponges that are not fully soaked may be sufficient to improve this method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether the visual estimation method for perioperative blood loss is accurate in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients, who were operated on from 2012 to 2015 and had a diagnosis of AIS, were included into the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A short training regarding optimizing the amount of blood contained in sponges that are not fully soaked may be sufficient to improve this method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess whether the visual estimation method for perioperative blood loss is accurate in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Methods: Sixty-five consecutive patients, who were operated on from 2012 to 2015 and had a diagnosis of AIS, were included into the study. Gender, age, preoperative weight and height, preoperative major curve magnitude and T5‒T12 kyphosis angles, the fusion level, and the time of surgery were recorded. Perioperative blood loss was estimated by the same anesthesiologist for all patients. Then, an experienced surgeon estimated the perioperative blood loss by a gravimetric method, and the results were compared. Results: Seventeen (26.2%) of the patients were male and 48 (73.8%) were female. The mean age was 15.8 ± 1.9. The mean height of the patients was 162.1 ± 8.9 cm and the mean weight was 52.6 ± 8.9 kg. The mean preoperative major curve magnitude and kyphosis angles were 49.5 ± 9.2 and 47.1 ± 12.7 respectively. The mean estimate of the surgeon was 1009 ± 404.5 ml and the mean estimate of the anesthesiologist was 434 ± 217.6 ml and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Moreover, if blood loss was high during the operation, the difference between the estimates of the surgeon and anesthesiologist was also higher. Conclusions: Even in operations where most of the blood goes into a suction canister, such as for AIS, a visual estimation method is not accurate. A short training regarding optimizing the amount of blood contained in sponges that are not fully soaked may be sufficient to improve this method.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ulusoy, A., DEMİRÖZ, S., ERDEM, Ş. (2018). How accurate is visual estimation of perioperative blood loss in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 4, 267–271. https://ajindex.com/articles/159692

References (1)

  1. Chen Z, Rong L. Comparison of combined anterioreposterior approach versus posterior-only approach in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a metaanalysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:363e371. Shapiro F, Sethna N. Blood loss in pediatric spine surgery. Eur Spine J. 2004;13: 6e17. Donaldson MD, Seaman MJ, Park GR. Massive blood transfusion. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:621e630. Karpati PC, Rossignol M, Pirot M, et al. High incidence of myocardial ischemia during postpartum hemorrhage. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:30e36. Glance LG, Dick AW, Mukamel DB, et al. Association between intraoperative blood transfusion and mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:283e292. Kathariya R, Devanoorkar A, Jain H. Intra-operative hemorrhage: a review of literature. J Med Diagn Meth. 2013;2:146. Rothermel LD, Lipman JM. Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable. Surgery. 2016;160:946e953. Mooney JF, Barfield WR. Validity of estimates of intraoperative blood loss in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Spine Deform. 2013;1:21e24. Newton M, Mosey LM, Egli GE, et al. Blood loss during and immediately after delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;17:9e18. Lee MH, Ingvertsen BT, Kirpensteign J, Jensen AL. Quantification of surgical blood loss. Vet Surg. 2006;35:388e393. Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, et al. Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;38:119e124. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillanceeUnited States, 1991e1999. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003;52: 1e8. Prasertcharoensuk W, Swadpanich U, Lumbiganon P. Accuracy of the blood loss estimation in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;71: 69e70. Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, et al. A comparison between visual estimation and laboratory determination of blood loss during the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:152e154. Brant HA. Precise estimation of postpartum haemorrhage: difficulties and importance. BMJ. 1967;1:398e400. Sukprasert M, Choktanasiri W, Ayudhya NI, et al. Increase accuracy of visual estimation of blood loss from education programme. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89: 54e59. Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, et al. Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281: 207e213. Higgins PG.