Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Urinary Stone Types’ Distribution in Turkey According to the Geographical Regions Where Patients were Born and Live: A Cross-sectional Single-center Experience

Pages
163–169
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both geographic origin and dietary habits affect the incidence of urinary system stone disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To evaluate the stone composition and the distribution of the stone types in the geographical regions of Turkey according to where patients were born and where patients live.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The patients who were treated for urinary system stone disease in our hospital between January 2011 and March 2019 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both geographic origin and dietary habits affect the incidence of urinary system stone disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims: To evaluate the stone composition and the distribution of the stone types in the geographical regions of Turkey according to where patients were born and where patients live. Methods: The patients who were treated for urinary system stone disease in our hospital between January 2011 and March 2019 were included in the study. Stone samples were collected by endoscopic stone surgery methods or shock wave lithotripsy. Stone analyses were made with manual chemical analysis methods. Stone types and distribution were recorded according to geographical regions of Turkey. Results: A total of 706 patients who were treated for urolithiasis were included in the study. Calcium oxalate (CO) stones were at the highest rates for both genders [127 (68.6%) and 359 (68.9%), for females and males, respectively]. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of stone types between genders (p=0.323). There were statistically significant more CO (297), uric acid (17), mixed stones (78) in the Anatolian (central) region than the other regions according to the geographical region where patients were born (p<0.001, for each). Additionally, there were significantly more calcium phosphate stone formers (25) in the Anatolian region according to the geographical region where patients lived (p<0.001). Conclusions: CO is the most common stone type in Turkey independently of where patients were born or where patients live. Higher prevalence rates of stone disease and CO stones were seen in Central Anatolia. Both geographic origin and dietary habits affect the incidence of urinary system stone disease.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIKAYA, S., YÜCEL, Ç., KARŞIYAKALI, N., SERTOĞLU, E., KAYA, E., EBİLOĞLU, T., BEDİR, S., ÖZGÜRTAŞ, T. (2020). Analysis of Urinary Stone Types’ Distribution in Turkey According to the Geographical Regions Where Patients were Born and Live: A Cross-sectional Single-center Experience. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3, 163–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/159645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey II: role of metabolic syndrome components on urolithiasis. Urol Res. 2012;40:247-252.
  2. Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E, et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey. I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Urol Res. 2011;39:309-314.
  3. Karabacak OR, Dilli A, Saltas H, Yalcinkaya F, Yorukoglu A, Sertcelik MN. Stone compositions in Turkey: an analysis according to gender and region. Urology. 2013;82:532-537.
  4. Ansari MS, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Spectrum of stone composition: structural analysis of 1050 upper urinary tract calculi from northern India. Int J Urol. 2005;12:12-16.
  5. Zeng J, Wang S, Zhong L, et al. A Retrospective Study of Kidney Stone Recurrence in Adults. J Clin Med Res. 2019;11:208-212.
  6. Kirkali Z, Rasooly R, Star RA, Rodgers GP. Urinary Stone Disease: Progress, Status, and Needs. Urology. 2015;86:651-653.
  7. Ogawa N, Sato S, Ida K, et al. Evaluation of Urinary Stone Composition and Differentiation between Urinary Stones and Phleboliths Using Single-source Dual-energy Computed Tomography. Acta Med Okayama. 2017;71:91- 96. Scherer K, Braig E, Willer K, et al. Non-invasive differentiation of kidney stone types using X-ray dark-field radiography. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9527. Kadlec AO, Greco KA, Fridirici ZC, Gerber D, Turk TMT. Effect of renal function on urinary mineral excretion and stone composition. Urology. 2011;78:744-747.
  8. Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P. Influence of body size on urinary stone composition in men and women. Urol Res. 2006;34:193-199.
  9. Daudon M, Jungers P, Bazin D, Williams JC Jr. Recurrence rates of urinary calculi according to stone composition and morphology. Urolithiasis. 2018;46:459-470.
  10. Miernik A, Eilers Y, Nuese C, et al. Is in vivo analysis of urinary stone composition feasible? Evaluation of an experimental setup of a Raman system coupled to commercial lithotripsy laser fibers. World J Urol. 2015;33:1593-1599.
  11. Miernik A, Eilers Y, Bolwien C, Lambrecht A, et al. Automated analysis of urinary stone composition using Raman spectroscopy: pilot study for the development of a compact portable system for immediate postoperative ex vivo application. J Urol. 2013;190:1895-1900.
  12. Ludwig WW, Matlaga BR. Urinary Stone Disease: Diagnosis, Medical Therapy, and Surgical Management. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102:265-277. Uldall A. A wet chemistry method for the analysis of urinary calculi. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1983;43:727-733.
  13. Tyson M, G