Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Histopathological Findings of Cystic Endometrial Morphology Based on Ultrasonographic Imaging in Premenopausal Women

Pages
33–37
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There wasn’t an association between cystic en- dometrium and other endometrial pathologies or functional endometrium.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the histopathological findings of cystic endometrial morphology based on ul- trasonographic imaging in premenopausal women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of 3607 premenopausal women that underwent an ultrasono- graphic examination at a tertiary care center were reviewed, as were endometrial biopsy findings in 816 of the women.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There wasn’t an association between cystic en- dometrium and other endometrial pathologies or functional endometrium.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the histopathological findings of cystic endometrial morphology based on ul- trasonographic imaging in premenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: The medical records of 3607 premenopausal women that underwent an ultrasono- graphic examination at a tertiary care center were reviewed, as were endometrial biopsy findings in 816 of the women. These 816 women were divided into 2 groups according to ultrasonographic endometrial findings: the cystic group and the non-cystic group. Clinical and histopathological findings in the 2 groups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using independent samples t - test, chi- square test, and binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred and eightyone (46.7%) of the women that underwent endometrial biopsy had cystic endometrium, whereas 435 (53.3%) had non-cystic endometrium. The most common histopatho- logical finding in the cystic group was endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (44.6%). Cystic morphology was nearly 8-fold more common in the women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (95% CI: 5.43- 11.67). The premalignant and malignant pathology rates in the cystic group and non-cystic group were similar (1.1% vs. 0.5% [p=0.426] and 0.8% vs. 0.5% [p=0.669], respectively). Secretory endometrium was less common in the cystic group than in the non-cystic group (5.0% vs. 37.9% [p< 0.001]). CONCLUSION: Cystic endometrial morphology based on ultrasonographic imaging was more common in women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. There wasn’t an association between cystic en- dometrium and other endometrial pathologies or functional endometrium.

🔖

Cite This Article

KINAY, T., KAPLAN, M., KAYIKÇIOĞLU, F., KARAKAYA, J. (2019). Histopathological Findings of Cystic Endometrial Morphology Based on Ultrasonographic Imaging in Premenopausal Women. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 33–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/159628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Grimes DA. Diagnostic dilation and curettage: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;142(1):1-6.
  2. Su H, Huang L, Huang KG, Yen CF, Han CM, Lee CL. Accuracy of hysteroscopic biopsy, compared to dilation and curettage, as a predictor of final pathology in patients with endometrial cancer. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;54(6): 757-60.
  3. Spadoto-Dias D, Bueloni-Dias FN, Elias LV, Leite NJ, Modotti WP, Lasmar RB, et al. The value of hysteroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. Womens Health. 2016;12(4):412-9.
  4. Ferrazzi E, Torri V, Trio D, Zannoni E, Filiberto S, Dordoni D. Sonographic endometrial thickness: a useful test to predict atrophy in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. An Italian multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;7(5): 315-21.
  5. Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Domali E, Vergote I, Moerman P, Amant F, et al. A thin and regular endometrium on ultrasound is very unlikely in patients with endometrial malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(6):674-9.
  6. Gull B, Karlsson B, Milsom I, Granberg S. Can ultrasound re- place dilation and curettage? A longitudinal evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding and transvaginal sonographic meas- urement of the endometrium as predictors of endometrial can- cer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(2):401-8.
  7. Ozdemir S, Celik C, Gezginc K, Kiresi D, Esen H. Evaluation of endometrial thickness with transvaginal ultra- sonography and histopathology in premenopausal women with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;282(4):395-9.
  8. Breitkopf DM, Frederickson RA, Snyder RR. Detection of benign endometrial masses by endometrial stripe measurement in premenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104 (1):120-5.
  9. Kim MJ, Kim JJ, Kim SM. Endometrial evaluation with trans- vaginal ultrasonography for the screening of endometrial hy- perplasia or cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(3):192-200.
  10. Van den Bosch T, Ameye L, Van Schoubroeck D, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Intra-cavitary uterine pathology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a prospective study of 1220 women. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2015;7(1):17-24.
  11. Dreisler E, Sorensen SS, Ibsen PH, Lose G. Value of endometrial thickness measurement for diagnosing focal intrauterine pathology in women without abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(3):344-8.
  12. Randelzhofer B, Prömpeler HJ, Sauerbrei W, Madjar H, Emons G. Value of sonomorphological criteria of the en- dometrium in women with postmen