Journals / Fırat Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Demografic, Clinical Findings and Prognosis of Patients with Symptomatic Epilepsy Followed Up at The Epilepsy Clinic of Harran University Faculty of Medicine

Harran Tıp Fakültesi Epilepsi Polikliniğinde Takipli Semptomatik Epilepsi Hastalarının Demografik, Klinik Bulguları ve Prognozu

Pages
37–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Regular follow-up from epilepsy polyclinic and the regulation of drug treatment have positive effects on seizure control in symptomatic epilepsy patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the symptomatic epilepsy patients followed up at the epilepsy clinic of Harran University Faculty of Medicine were investigated and the efficacy of prospective follow-up on epilepsy polyclinic was evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 210 of patients treated at the epilepsy outpatient clinic between September 2015- June 2016 were evaluated retrospectively and 44 patients with suspected symptomatic epilepsy and a structural lesion that increased the risk of seizure on brain imaging were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Regular follow-up from epilepsy polyclinic and the regulation of drug treatment have positive effects on seizure control in symptomatic epilepsy patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the symptomatic epilepsy patients followed up at the epilepsy clinic of Harran University Faculty of Medicine were investigated and the efficacy of prospective follow-up on epilepsy polyclinic was evaluated. Material and Method: 210 of patients treated at the epilepsy outpatient clinic between September 2015- June 2016 were evaluated retrospectively and 44 patients with suspected symptomatic epilepsy and a structural lesion that increased the risk of seizure on brain imaging were included in the study. Results: Five patients (11.4%) had cortical developmental malformation , 3 (6.8%) neurocutaneous syndrome, 5 (11.4) tumor, 10 (22.7%) head trauma, 10 (22.7%) perinatal injury, 8 (18.2%) encephalomalacia, 2 (4.5%) encephalitis sequelae and 1 (2.3%) patient with mesial temporal sclerosis. The seizures of 10 patients were under control when they applied to our epilepsy outpatient clinic. The treatment of 34 (81.8%) patients whose seizures were not under control was changed. 21 of them (47.7%) had only drug dose increase, 7 (15.9%) both new drug addition and current antiepileptic dose increase, and 6 (13.6%) only new drug addition. 12 (28.9%) patients had seizure control. 12 (26.7%) patients had more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency and 7 (17.8%) patients had less than 50% reduction. Seizures of 1 (2.2%) patient did not change. 15 (34.1%) patients were evaluated as drug resistant epilepsy. Conclusion: Regular follow-up from epilepsy polyclinic and the regulation of drug treatment have positive effects on seizure control in symptomatic epilepsy patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy

Özet

Amaç: Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Epilepsi Polikliniği’inden takipli semptomatik epilepsili hasta grubunun demografik ve klinik özellikleri incelendi ve epilepsi polikliniğinde düzenli takibin prognoz üzerindeki etkinliği araştırıldı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Epilepsi Polikliniğinde Eylül 2015– Haziran 2016 tarihleri arasında takip edilen 210 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi ve öyküsünde semptomatik epilepsi düşünülen ve beraberinde beyin görüntülemesinde nöbet geçirme riskini artıran yapısal lezyonu olan 44 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Bulgular: Hastaların 5’i (%11.4) kortikal gelişimsel malformasyon, 3‘ü (%6.8) nörokütanöz sendrom, 5’i (11.4) tümör, 10’u (%22.7) kafa travması, 10’u (%22.7) perinatal hasar, 8’i (%18.2) ensefalomalazi, 2’si (%4.5) ensefalit sekeli, 1’i (%2.3) mesial temporal skleroz hastası idi. Epilepsi polikliniğimize başvurduğunda 10 hastanın nöbetleri kontrol altındaydı. Nöbetleri kontrol altında olmayan 34 (%81.8) hastanın tedavisinde değişiklik yapıldı. Bunların 21’i (%47.7) sadece ilaç doz artışı, 7’si (%15.9) hem yeni ilaç eklenmesi hem de mevcut antiepileptik doz artışı, 6‘sı (%13,6) sadece yeni ilaç eklenmesi şeklindeydi. Takiplerinde 12 hastada nöbet kontrolü, 12 hastada nöbet sıklığında %50’den fazla azalma, 7 hastada %50’den az azalma gözlendi. Bir hastada ise değişiklik olmadı. Onbeş (%34.1) hasta dirençli epilepsi olarak değerlendirildi. Sonuç: Tedaviye dirençli epilepsisi olan semptomatik epilepsi hastalarında epilepsi polikliniğinden düzenli takibin ve ilaç tedavisinin düzenlenmesinin nöbet kontrolü üzerine olumlu etkileri vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ETHEMOĞLU, Ö. U., KOCATÜRK, M., ETHEMOĞLU, K. B. (2019). Demografic, Clinical Findings and Prognosis of Patients with Symptomatic Epilepsy Followed Up at The Epilepsy Clinic of Harran University Faculty of Medicine. Fırat Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 37–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/159521

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Reynolds JR. Epilepsy: its symptoms, treatment and relation to other chronic convulsive diseases. London: Churchill; 1861. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Epilepsia 1989; 30: 389-98.
  2. Berg AT, Berkovic SF, Brodie MJ, et al. Revised terminology and concepts for organization of seizures and epilepsies: Report of the ILAE Commission on Classification and Terminology. 2005- 2009. Epilepsia 2010; 51: 676-85.
  3. Bergamasco B, Benna P, Ferrero P, et al. Perinatal pathology and epilepsy. Prog Clin Biol Res 1983; 124: 185-98.
  4. Chawla S, Aneja S, Kashyap, et al. Etiology and Clinical Predictors of Intractable Epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 2002; 27: 186-91.
  5. Scarpa P, Carassini P. Partial epilepsy in childhood. Clinical and EEG study of 261 cases. Epilepsia 1982; 23: 333-41. Blume WT. Clinical profile of partial seizures beginning at less than four years of age. Epilepsia 1989; 30: 813-9. Commission on clinical tropical diseases of International League Against Epilepsy. Relationship between epilepsy and tropical diseases. Epilepsia 1994; 35: 89-100.
  6. Ekici B, Aydınlı N, Aydın K, et al. Epilepsy in children with periventricular leukomalacia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115: 2046-8 Bass WT. Periventricular leukomalacia. NeoReviews 2011; 12: 76-83.
  7. Agrawal A, Timothy J, Pandit L, et al. Posttraumatic epilepsy: an overview. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006; 108: 433-9. Frey LC. Epidemiology of post-traumatic epilepsy: a critical review. Epilepsia 2003; 44 Suppl 10: 11- 7. Annegers JF, et al. The risks of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury. Seizure 2000; 9: 453-7.
  8. Semah F, Picot M-C, Adam C, et al. Is the underlying cause of epilepsy a major prognostic factor for recurrence? Neurology 1998; 51: 1256-62.
  9. Agrawal A, Timothy J, Pandit L, et al. Posttraumatic epilepsy:an overview. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2006; 108: 433-9.
  10. Annegers JF, Hauser A, Coan SP, et al. A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 20-24. da Silva AM, Vaz AR, Ribeiro I, et al. Controversies in posttraumatic epilepsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1990; 50: 48-51.
  11. Rao VR, Parko KL. Clinical approach to posttraumatic epilepsy. Semin Neurol 2015; 35: 57-63.
  12. Young KD, Okada PJ, Sokolove PE, et al. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of phenytoin for the prevention of early posttraumatic seizures in children with moderate to severe blun