Journals / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1

Roles of the systemic inflammatory response biomarkers in the diagnosis of cancer patients with solid tumors

Pages
37–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Certain systemic inflammatory response biomarkers, such as the NLR and LMR, can play roles in the clinical diagnosis of patients with solid tumors

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Cancer is still considered as one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 256 patients with solid tumors, including lung, breast, liver, and pancreatic cancers, who were diagnosed at the outpatient clinics of our institution between January 201 7 and July 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Certain systemic inflammatory response biomarkers, such as the NLR and LMR, can play roles in the clinical diagnosis of patients with solid tumors
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: Cancer is still considered as one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Various tumor factors have been used for the diagnosis and follow-up of solid tumors; however, their clinical features remains controversial in terms of their diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive values. In this study, we aimed to investigate the use of the systemic inflammatory response biomarkers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-tomonocyte ratio (LMR), in the diagnosis of solid tumors. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 256 patients with solid tumors, including lung, breast, liver, and pancreatic cancers, who were diagnosed at the outpatient clinics of our institution between January 201 7 and July 2018. The neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts were measured using a hematology analyzer and the results were analyzed statistically. Results: The results of the receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the NLR and LMR could be statistically reliable biomarkers, with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.574 (p = 0.017) and 0.596 (p = 0.002). However, the PLR statistically failed to discriminate the patients and the control subjects, with AUC values of 0.545 (p = 0.148). Conclusions: Certain systemic inflammatory response biomarkers, such as the NLR and LMR, can play roles in the clinical diagnosis of patients with solid tumors

🔖

Cite This Article

YİS, Ö. M., BUĞDAYCI, G., PEHLİVAN, M. B., BAŞOL, M. (2019). Roles of the systemic inflammatory response biomarkers in the diagnosis of cancer patients with solid tumors. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 1, 37–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/159497

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Organization WH. World Health Organization Cancer Fact. World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/cancer/en [2]Dolan RD, Lim J, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The role of the systemic inflammatory response in predicting outcomes in patients with operable cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017
  2. 7(1):16717. [3]Khunger M, Patil PD, Khunger A, Li M, Hu B, Rakshit S, et al. Post-treatment changes in hematological parameters predict response to nivolumab monotherapy in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients. PLoS One. 2018
  3. 13(10):e0197743. [4]Fu H, Zheng J, Cai J, Zeng K, Yao J, Chen L, et al. Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) is Useful to Predict Survival Outcomes in Patients after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma within Hangzhou Criteria. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018
  4. 47(1):293–301. [5]Fujiwara Y, Haruki K, Shiba H, Hamura R, Horiuchi T, Shirai Y, et al. C-Reactive Protein-based Prognostic Measures Are Superior at Predicting Survival Compared with Peripheral Blood Cell Count-based Ones in Patients After Curative Resection for Pancreatic Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018
  5. 38(11):6491–9. [6]Hu Y, Wang JL, Tao HT, Wu BS, Sun J, Cheng Y, et al. Expression and significance of TSGF, CEA and AFP in patients before and after radical surgery for colon cancer. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2013
  6. 14(6):3877–80. [7]Kilincalp S, Çoban Ş, Akinci H, Hamamc M, Karaahmet F, Coşkun Y, et al. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume as potential biomarkers for early detection and monitoring of colorectal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2015
  7. 24(4):328–33. [8]Molina R, Barak V, Van Dalen A, Duffy MJ, Einarsson R, Gion M, et al. Tumor markers in breast cancer - European group on tumor markers recommendations. Tumor Biol. 2005
  8. 26(6):281 –93. [9]Wong RJ, Ahmed A, Gish RG. Elevated Alpha-Fetoprotein: Differential Diagnosis Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Other Disorders. Clin Liver Dis. 2015
  9. 19(2):309– 23. [10] Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014
  10. 15(11):e493–503. [11] Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008
  11. 454(7203):436–44. [12] Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman S V., Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015
  12. 21(8):938–45. [13] Häuselmann I, Roblek M, Protsyuk D, Huck V,