SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Learning Object Affordances from Sensory-Motor Interaction via Bayesian Networks with Auto-Encoder Features

Mete Tuluhan AKBULUT
EMRE UĞUR
Pages
52–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We illustrate the advantages of our model by comparing it with the two aforementioned models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we study learning relationships between objects, actions, and effects. “Affordance” is an ecological psychology concept, which addresses how humans learn these relationships and which is also studied in cognitive robotics to transfer thesame ability to robots.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The dimensions of features are decreased through autoencoders to achieve a compact network.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We illustrate the advantages of our model by comparing it with the two aforementioned models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, we study learning relationships between objects, actions, and effects. “Affordance” is an ecological psychology concept, which addresses how humans learn these relationships and which is also studied in cognitive robotics to transfer thesame ability to robots. Our model is built on top of two existing models in this field and uses their strengths to introduce a novel system, where an anthropomorphic robot observes its environment and changes in that environment after executing pre-learned actions. Robot transfers these observations to object and effect properties in the same space and object affordances are learned using Bayesian Networks. The dimensions of features are decreased through autoencoders to achieve a compact network. Usage of a probabilistic model helps our system to deal with missing information or to make predictions for object properties and actions along with effect properties. We illustrate the advantages of our model by comparing it with the two aforementioned models.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKBULUT, M. T., UĞUR, E. (2020). Learning Object Affordances from Sensory-Motor Interaction via Bayesian Networks with Auto-Encoder Features. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 52–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/159410

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. D. Silver et al., “A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play,” Science, vol. 362, no. 6419, pp. 1140–1144, 2018. [2][2] G. Dulac-Arnold, D. J. Mankowitz, and T. Hester, “Challenges [3][3] E. W. Bushnell andJ. P. Boudreau, “Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development,” Child Development, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1005–1021, 1993. [4][4] K. S. Bourgeois, A. W. Khawar, S. A. Neal, and J. J. Lockman, “Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations”, Infancy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 233–252, 2005. [5][5] H. L. Pick, “Eleanor j. gibson: Learning to perceive and perceiving tolearn.” Developmental Psychology, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 787, 1992. [6][6] J. J. Gibson, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986. [7][7] M. A. Goodale and A. D. Milner, “Separate visual pathways for perception and action,”Trends Neurosci, vol. 15, pp. 20–25, 1992. [8][8] Ben-Gal I., Bayesian Networks, in Ruggeri F., Faltin F. & Kenett R.,Encyclopedia of Statistics in Quality & Reliability, Wiley & Sons (2007). [9][9] D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing. Vol 1: Foundations. MIT Press,
  2. Cambridge, MA, 1986. [10][10] J. Weng, J. McClelland, A. Pentland, O. Sporns, I. Stockman, M. Sur,E. Thelen, Autonomous Mental Development by Robots and Animals, Science 291 (2001) 599–600. [11][11] M. Lungarella, G. Metta, R. Pfeifer, G. Sandini, Developmental robotics: a survey, Connection Science 15 (2003) 151–190. [12][12] M. Asada, K. Hosoda, Y. Kuniyoshi, H. Ishiguro, T. Inui, Y. Yoshikawa, M. Ogino, C. Yoshida, Cognitive developmental robotics: a survey,IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 1 (2009) 12–34. [13][13] A. Stoytchev, Some basic principles of developmental robotics, IEEE, Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development 1 (2009) 122–130. [14][14] G. Metta, P. Fitzpatrick, Better vision through manipulation, Adaptive Behavior 11 (2003) 109–128. [15][15] P. Fitzpatrick, G. Metta, L. Natale, A. Rao, G. Sandini, Learning about objects through action -initial steps towards artificial cognition, in: Proc. of ICRA 03, IEEE, 2003, pp. 3140–3145. [16][16] A. Stoytchev, Behavior-grounded representation of tool affordances, in: In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)