Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Importance of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Pages
178–185
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the classical MRI findings of the ACL injuries, as well as the location of the injured region and the quality of the remaining tissue, are addressed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Patients with a clinically suspected tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are generally diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is accepted that MR is the most effective radiological modality for diagnosing ACL injuries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the classical MRI findings of the ACL injuries, as well as the location of the injured region and the quality of the remaining tissue, are addressed.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Patients with a clinically suspected tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are generally diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is accepted that MR is the most effective radiological modality for diagnosing ACL injuries. Formerly, the essential aim of MRI was to detect whether the ACL tear was partial or total. Recently, however, there has been an increasing interest in the region of rupture. In addition, it is highly important to focus on the tissue quality of the remaining ligament. These findings will help the orthopedic surgeon to choose the right surgical treatment technique. In this review, the classical MRI findings of the ACL injuries, as well as the location of the injured region and the quality of the remaining tissue, are addressed.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, B., DİRİK, M., POLAT, A. (2018). Importance of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 178–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/159306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: a national population-based study. J Sci Med Sport 2009
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H. High prevalance of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 2004
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Feagin JA, Abbott HG, Rokous JR. The isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972
  4. Marshall JL, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL. Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament lesions. Am J Sports Med 1982
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Gobbi A, Mahajan V, Karnatzikos G, Nakamura N. Single versus double bundle ACL reconstruction: Is there any difference in stability and function at 3-year follow up? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Jansson KA, Linko E, Sandelin J, Harilainen A. A Prospective randomized study patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2003
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anotomical, functionl and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1975
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Chouteau J, Testa R, Viste A, Moyen B. Knee rotational laxity and proprioceptive function 2 years after partial ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Sonnery-Cottet B, Panisset JC, Colombet P, Cucurulo T, Graveleau N, Hulet C, et al. Partial ACL reconstruction with preservation of the posterolateral bundle. Orthop Trumatol Surg Res 2012
  10. 98(Suppl 8): S165-70. [CrossRef] 10. DiFelice GS, Villegas C, Taylor S. Anterior cruciate ligament preservation: early results of a novel arthroscopic tecnique for suture anchor primary anterior cruciate repair. Arthroscopy 2015
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Achtnich A, Herbst E, Forkel P, Metzlaff S, Sprenker F, Imhoff AB, et al. Acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: outcomes after arthroscopic suture anchor repair versus anatomic single-bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2016
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Smith JO, Yasen SK, Palmer HC, Lord BR, Britton EM, Wilson AJ. Paediatric ACL repair reinforced with temporary internal bracing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Klass D, Toms AP, Greenwood R, Hopgood P. MR i