SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2017 / Volume: 4 Issue: 4

THE EFFECTS OF SYMBOLIC IMAGE DIMENSIONS ON EMPLOYER ATTRACTIVENESS IN TERMS OF EMPLOYER BRANDING CONCEPT

Furkan Marasli
Mujdelen Ipek Yener
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All three dimensions of symbolic image have significant effect on all four dimensions of employer attractiveness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- Employer branding has been subject to various studies in strategic human resource field in order to attract high-skilled potential employees and retain existing employees to create competitive advantage over its competitors with creating high intellectual capital assets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology- In order to test propositions, questionnaires are conducted on 181 last year bachelor, master and PhD students which are considered as potential employees for organizations in Turkish universities between the years 2016-2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All three dimensions of symbolic image have significant effect on all four dimensions of employer attractiveness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Employer brand · employer branding · employer attractiveness

Abstract

Purpose- Employer branding has been subject to various studies in strategic human resource field in order to attract high-skilled potential employees and retain existing employees to create competitive advantage over its competitors with creating high intellectual capital assets. Present study aims to focus on the effects of symbolic image dimensions of employer on employer attractiveness. Methodology- In order to test propositions, questionnaires are conducted on 181 last year bachelor, master and PhD students which are considered as potential employees for organizations in Turkish universities between the years 2016-2017. Data gathered from questionnaires are analyzed through SPSS program. Findings- All the suggested hypothesis regarding to research model are accepted and findings are consistent with the literature. Conclusion- Analysis results revealed that symbolic image dimensions of employer have significant positive affect on employer attractiveness. All three dimensions of symbolic image have significant effect on all four dimensions of employer attractiveness.

🔖

Cite This Article

Marasli, F., Yener, M. I. (2017). THE EFFECTS OF SYMBOLIC IMAGE DIMENSIONS ON EMPLOYER ATTRACTIVENESS IN TERMS OF EMPLOYER BRANDING CONCEPT. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Volume: 4 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Ambler, T. & Barrow, S. (1996) the employer brand. Journal of Brand Management, 4(3), pp. 185–206.
  2. Backhaus, K., and Tikoo, S., (2004), "Conceptualizing and researching employer branding," Career Development International, 9.5 pp. 501-517.
  3. Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99-120
  4. Barrow, S., Mosley, R., (2005), The Employer Brand, Wiley, London
  5. Berthon, P. Ewing, M., & Hah, L. L. (2005). “Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding.” International Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 151-172
  6. Cable M.D., Turban D.B. (2003). The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective.
  7. Davies, G. (2008). Employer branding and its influence on managers. European Journal of Marketing, 42(5/6), 667-681
  8. Ewing, M.T., Pitt, L.F., de Bussy, N.M. & Berthon, P. (2002) Employment branding in the knowledge economyInternational Journal of Advertising, 21(1), pp. 3–22.
  9. Jiang, T. T., Iles, P. (2011). Employer-brand equity, organizational attractiveness and talent management in the Zhejiang private sector, China // Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 6, No. 1
  10. Kashyap, V., & Rangnekar, S. (2014). Servant leadership, employer brand perception, trust in leaders and turnover intentions: a sequential mediation model. Review of Managerial Science, 1-25.
  11. Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press.
  12. Lievens, F. and Highhouse, S. (2003), “The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 56, pp. 75-102.
  13. Lievens, F., Van Hoye, G., & Anseel, F. (2007). Organizational identity and employer image: Towards a unifyingframework. British Journal of Management, 18, S45– S59.
  14. Lievens, F. (2007). Employer branding in the Belgian Army: The importance of instrumental and symbolic beliefs forPotential applicants, actual applicants, and military employees. Human Resource Management, 46, 51 69.
  15. Lloyd, S. (2002) Branding from the inside out. BRW, 24(10), pp. 64–66.
  16. Martin R. Edwards, (2009) "An integrative review of employer branding and OB theory", Personnel Review, Vol. 39 Issue: 1, pp.5-23
  17. Martin, G. Beaumont, P., Doig, R., Pate, J. (2005). Branding: A New Performance Discourse for HR? // European Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1.
  18. Moroco L., Uncles M.D. (2008) Characteristics of successful employer brand, Brand Management1350-23IX Vol. 16, NO. 3, 160–175
  19. Rampl, L. V. (2014). How to become an employer of choice: transforming employer brand associations into employer firstchoice brands. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13-14), 1486-1504.
  20. Slaughter, J.E., Zickar, M.J., Highhouse, S., & Mohr, D.C. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 85–103.
  21. Srivastava, P and Bhatnagar, J. (2010) “Employer brand for talent acquisition; an exploration towards its measurement. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 14(1-2), 25-34.
  22. Sullivan, S. (1999), “The changing nature of careers: a review and research agenda”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, pp. 457-75.
  23. Sullivan, J., (2002), “Crafting a Lofty Employer Brand: A Costly Proposition,” ER Daily, November, 25 (as cited in Backhaus, K., and Tikoo, S., (2004), “Conceptualising and Researching Employer Branding,” Career Development International, 9.5, pp. 501–517.
  24. Sullivan, J. (2004), “Eight elements of a successful employment brand”, ER Daily, 23 February,
  25. Van Hoye, G., Bas, T., Cromheecke, S., & Lievens, F. (2013). The instrumental and symbolic dimensions of Organisations' image as an employer: A large-scale field study on employer branding in Turkey. Applied Psychology
  26. Wilden, R., Gudergan, S., & Lings, I. (2010). Employer branding: strategic implications for staff recruitment. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(1-2), 56-73.