SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics / 2025 / Volume: 12 Issue: 2

THE ROLE OF SEXUAL DESIRE ON ADVERTISING ATTRACTIVENESS AND ONLINE PURCHASE INTENTION: EVIDENCE FROM FRAGRANCE VIDEO COMMERCIALS

Mohammad Karami(NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1903-828X
Sarvenaz Safavi(NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7943-4893
Nasim Ahmadzade Nobari Azar(NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-7674-9277
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The outcomes of this study contribute to the literature on advertising and online customer purchase intention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose- This study was conducted to examine the relationship between signs used in voluptuous video commercials, customer perceived attractiveness, and online purchase intention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total, 373 valid data, collected from respondents with previous online purchasing experiences, were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The outcomes of this study contribute to the literature on advertising and online customer purchase intention.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:online purchase intention · semiotics · fragrances

Abstract

Purpose- This study was conducted to examine the relationship between signs used in voluptuous video commercials, customer perceived attractiveness, and online purchase intention. Additionally, this study analyzed the role of individual sexual desire as a moderator in hypothesized relationships. Methodology- The data were collected in two phases using convenience sampling technique and judgmental sampling technique. In total, 373 valid data, collected from respondents with previous online purchasing experiences, were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings- The results revealed that signs positively influenced the customers’ perception of advertisement attractiveness (β = 0.412, p< 0.001). Furthermore, the outcomes demonstrated the positive effect of perceived advertisement attractiveness on online intention to purchase (β = 0.126, p< 0.05). In addition, the indices indicated the positive moderating role of self-sexual desire on the relationships between signs-perceived advertisement attractiveness and perceived advertisement attractiveness-online purchase intention (β = 0.751, p <0.001; β = 0.218, p<0.05). Conclusion- Despite the limitations in this study, the findings provide suggestions to practitioners and commercial designers in the perfume industry on how to create attractive advertisements to have the desired impact on customers, focusing on the customers’ emotions and sexual desires. The outcomes of this study contribute to the literature on advertising and online customer purchase intention.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karami, M., Safavi, S., Azar, N. A. N. (2025). THE ROLE OF SEXUAL DESIRE ON ADVERTISING ATTRACTIVENESS AND ONLINE PURCHASE INTENTION: EVIDENCE FROM FRAGRANCE VIDEO COMMERCIALS. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, Volume: 12 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.2019

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (101)

  1. Adomaitis, A. D., Saiki, D., & del Pozo Severino, J. (2024). Impact of sex in luxury fashion advertisements on brand attractiveness and identification. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 28(3), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-08-2022-0181
  2. Aguirre-Rodriguez, A., Bosnjak, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2012). Moderators of the self-congruity effect on consumer decision-making: A meta- analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1124-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.031
  3. Agustia, K. T. S., & Karmini, L. A. M. (2020). The analysis of verbal and visual meanings of advertisments found at the now Bali magazine: a semantic study. Litera Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 6(1), 15-22.
  4. Al-Adwan, A. S., Alrousan, M. K., Yaseen, H., Alkufahy, A. M., & Alsoud, M. (2022). Boosting online purchase ıntention in high-uncertainty-avoidance societies: a signaling theory approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030136
  5. Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1079–1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1079
  6. Andhika Dhananjaya, P., Wandia, I. K., & Isnu Maharani, S. A. (2019). Verbal and non-verbal signs of Moana Movie Poster. Humanis. https://doi.org/10.24843/jh.2019.v23.i01.p08
  7. Anglada-Tort, M., Keller, S., Steffens, J., & Müllensiefen, D. (2021). The impact of source effects on the evaluation of music for advertising are there differences in how advertising professionals and consumers judge music? Journal of Advertising Research, 61(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2020-016
  8. Arief, M. (2021). Marketing Analysis: Security and public trust online shopping at shopee.co.id. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 11(2), 65-78.
  9. Arief, M., Mustikowati, R. I., & Chrismardani, Y. (2023). Why customers buy an online product? The effects of advertising attractiveness, influencer marketing and online customer reviews. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/lbsjmr-
  10. 0052 Asan, K. (2022). Measuring the impacts of travel influencers on bicycle travellers. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(6), 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2021.1914004
  11. Audrezet, A., de Kerviler, G., & Guidry Moulard, J. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self- presentation. Journal of Business Research, 24, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
  12. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  13. Basson, R. (2000). The female sexual response: A different model. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 26(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278641
  14. Bekk, M., Spörrle, M., & Kruse, J. (2016). The benefits of similarity between tourist and destination personality. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287515606813
  15. Bower, A. B. (2001). Highly attractive models in advertising and the women who loathe them: The implications of negative affect for spokesperson effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673645
  16. Byrne, D., Clore, G. L., & Smeaton, G. (1986). The attraction hypothesis. do similar attitudes affect anything? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 234-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1167
  17. Casado-Aranda, L. A., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Montoro-Ríos, F. J. (2017). Neural correlates of voice gender and message framing in advertising: A functional MRI study. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 10(4), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000076
  18. Chang, H. J. J., O’Boyle, M., Anderson, R. C., & Suttikun, C. (2016). An fMRI study of advertising appeals and their relationship to product attractiveness and buying intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(6), 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1591
  19. Chang, S. H., Chih, W. H., Liou, D. K., & Yang, Y. T. (2016). The mediation of cognitive attitude for online shopping. Information Technology and People, 29(3), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-08-2014-0172
  20. Chen, F., Sukpasjaroen, K., & Chankoson, T. (2022). Influence of light and color of advertising photography on consumers’ purchase intention. Innovative Marketing, 18(4), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(4).2022.18
  21. Chen, M. J., Grube, J. W., Bersamin, M., Waiters, E., & Keefe, D. B. (2005). Alcohol advertising: What makes it attractive to youth? Journal of Health Communication, 10(6), 334-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730500228904
  22. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. In NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  23. Dahnil, M. I., Marzuki, K. M., Langgat, J., & Fabeil, N. F. (2014). Factors Influencing SMEs Adoption of Social Media Marketing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.025
  24. Dai, B., Forsythe, S., & Kwon, W. S. (2013). The impact of online shopping experience on risk perceptions and online purchase intentions: Does product category matter? Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1), 22-34.
  25. Del Zotto, M., Framorando, D., & Pegna, A. J. (2020). Waist-to-hip ratio affects female body attractiveness and modulates early brain responses. European Journal of Neuroscience, 52(11), 456-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14209
  26. Del Zotto, M., & Pegna, A. J. (2017). Electrophysiological evidence of perceived sexual attractiveness for human female bodies varying in waist-to-hip ratio. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(3), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0498-8
  27. DeShields, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (1996). Source effects in purchase decisions: The impact of physical attractiveness and accent of salesperson. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00036-4
  28. Dewi, N. N. Y. R., Pratiwi, D. P. E., & Santika, I. D. A. D. M. (2021). The meaning of verbal and nonverbal signs in Maybelline advertisements. Social Science, Public Administration and Management, 1(4). 167-179.
  29. Eckman, M., & Wagner, J. (1994). Judging the attractiveness of product design: the effect of visual attributes and consumer characteristics. Advances in Consumer Research, 5, 21-39.
  30. Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025003008
  31. Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for Attractiveness in romantic partners and same-sex friends: a meta-analysis and theoretical critique. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.226
  32. Figl, K., Derntl, M., Rodriguez, M. C., & Botturi, L. (2010). Cognitive effectiveness of visual instructional design languages. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 21(6), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2010.08.009
  33. Flavián, C., Gurrea, R., & Orús, C. (2017). The influence of online product presentation videos on persuasion and purchase channel preference: The role of imagery fluency and need for touch. Tele matics and Informatics, 34(8), 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.002
  34. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
  35. Furaji, F., Łatuszyńska, M., Wawrzyniak, A., & Wąsikowska, B. (2013). Study on the influence of advertising attractiveness on the purchase decisions of women and men. Journal of International Studies, 6(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2013/6-2/2
  36. Gramazio, S., Cadinu, M., Guizzo, F., & Carnaghi, A. (2021). Does sex really sell? Paradoxical effects of sexualization in advertising on product attractiveness and purchase ıntentions. Sex Roles, 84(11–12). 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01190-6
  37. Guido, G., Peluso, A. M., & Moffa, V. (2011). Beardedness in advertising: Effects on endorsers’ credibility and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260903157383
  38. Ha, S. H., Bae, S. Y., & Son, L. K. (2015). Impact of online consumer reviews on product sales: Quantitative analysis of the source effect. Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences, 9(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.12785/amis/092L12
  39. Harahap, D. A., & Amanah, D. (2018). Online purchasing decisions of college students in Indonesia. In International Journal of Latest Engineering Research and Applications, 3(10), 788-801.
  40. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  41. Herz, R. (2007). The scent of desire: Discovering our enigmatic sense of smell. New York: William Morrow/ HarperCollins.
  42. HORTON, R. S. (2003). Similarity and attractiveness in social perception: differentiating between biases for the self and the beautiful. Self and Identity, 2(2),105-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309033
  43. Ikawati, K., Militina, T., & Achmad, G. N. (2021). The effect of celebrity endorsers and advertising attractiveness on brand ımage and purchase decisions for tokopedia application users in Samarinda. Business and Accounting Research, 5(2),78-91.
  44. Indiani, N. L. P., & Fahik, G. A. (2020). Conversion of online purchase intention into actual purchase: The moderating role of transaction security and convenience. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11346
  45. Iqbal, W. (2021). Impact of perceived risk on customer’s online purchase intention towards branded apparels. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 1(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.52633/jms.v1i1.3
  46. Jalilvand, M. R., Salimipour, S., Elyasi, M., & Mohammadi, M. (2017). Factors influencing word of mouth behaviour in the restaurant industry. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 35(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-02-2016-0024
  47. Jones, J. E., Jones, L. L., Calvert, M. J., Damery, S. L., & Mathers, J. M. (2022). A literature review of studies that have compared the use of face-to-face and online focus groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221142406
  48. Joseph Cronin, J., & Morris, M. H. (1989). Satisfying customer expectations: The effect on conflict and repurchase intentions in industrial marketing channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726352
  49. Kergoat, M., Meyer, T., & Merot, A. (2017). Picture-based persuasion in advertising: the impact of attractive pictures on verbal ad’s content. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(7), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2016-1691
  50. Kiecker, P., & Cowles, D. (2002). Interpersonal communication and personal influence on the internet: A framework for examining online word-of-mouth. Journal of Euromarketing, 11(2), 102-121. https://doi.org/10.1300/J037v11n02_04
  51. Kim, H., & Park, M. (2023). Virtual influencers’ attractiveness effect on purchase intention: A moderated mediation model of the Product– Endorser fit with the brand. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(3), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107703
  52. Kim, W., & Cha, S. (2021). How attributes of green advertising affect purchase intention: The moderating role of consumer innovativeness. Sustainability, 13(16), 1120-1132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168723
  53. Kodžoman, D., Hladnik, A., Pavko Čuden, A., & Čok, V. (2022). Exploring color attractiveness and its relevance to fashion. Color Research and Application, 47(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22705
  54. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
  55. Law, M., Kwok, R. C. W., & Ng, M. (2016). An extended online purchase intention model for middle-aged online users. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.10.005
  56. Lee, E. J., & Park, J. (2014). Enhancing virtual presence in e-tail: Dynamics of cue multiplicity. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(4), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415180405
  57. Lee, E. J., & Shin, S. Y. (2014). When do consumers buy online product reviews? Effects of review quality, product type, and reviewer’s photo. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 67-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.050
  58. Levine, S. B. (1987). More on the nature of sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 13(1), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926238708403877
  59. Levine, S. B. (2002). Reexploring the concept of sexual desire. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262302317251007
  60. Levine, S. B. (2003). The nature of sexual desire: a clinician’s perspective. In Archives of Sexual Behavior, 32(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023421819465
  61. Lim, Y. J., Osman, A., Salahuddin, S. N., Romle, A. R., & Abdullah, S. (2016). Factors ınfluencing online shopping behavior: the mediating role of purchase ıntention. Procedia Economics and Finance, 5(1), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00050-2
  62. Ling, K. C., Chai, L. T., & Piew, T. H. (2010). The effects of shopping orientations, online trust and prior online purchase experience toward customers’ online purchase ıntention. International Business Research, 3(3), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v3n3p63
  63. Liu, M. T., Huang, Y. Y., & Minghua, J. (2007). Relations among attractiveness of endorsers, match-up, and purchase intention in sport marketing in China. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(6), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710822945
  64. Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(3), 203-220.
  65. Mahdavi, M., Barbosa, B., Oliveira, Z., & Chkoniya, V. (2020). Sounds of scents: olfactory-auditory correspondences in the online purchase experience of perfume. Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 22(4), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i4.4083
  66. Mark, K., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). The object of sexual desire: Examining the “What” in “What do you desire?” Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 1445-1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12683
  67. Mensing, J. (2023). Welcome to the Neuroperfumery. In Beautiful SCENT. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67259-4_4
  68. Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2007). Role of electronic trust in online retailing: A re-examination of the commitment-trust theory. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9–10). 1121-1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710773390
  69. Mulford, M., Orbell, J., Shatto, C., & Stockard, J. (1998). Physical attractiveness, opportunity, and success in everyday exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1086/231401
  70. Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-11-2014-1221
  71. Nowlis, S. M., Mandel, N., & McCabe, D. B. (2004). The effect of a delay between choice and consumption on consumption enjoyment. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1086/425085
  72. Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory’ 25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 632-645. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X004010007
  73. Oputa, E. A., Fakhrorazi, A., & Islam, R. (2019). The influence of semiotic advertising efficacy on GEN-Y purchase intent: A study of reputable major brands of smart phone. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7129
  74. Overmars, S., & Poels, K. (2015). Online product experiences: The effect of simulating stroking gestures on product understanding and the critical role of user control. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 3321-3340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.033
  75. Pan, P. L. (2014). Toward an ıntegrated model of purchase ıntention of dietary supplements in sexually oriented advertising. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20(2), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.726948
  76. Peretz, I., & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. In The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198525202.001.0001
  77. Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.609
  78. Phau, I., & Lum, L. (2000). Effects of “physical attractiveness” in the evaluation of print advertisements. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 12(4), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850010764668
  79. Phelps, J., & Thorson, E. (1991). Brand familiarity and product ınvolvement effects on the attitude toward an ad - brand attitude relationship. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(18), 3211-3229.
  80. Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.48
  81. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. In Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  82. Reichert, T., LaTour, M. S., & Ford, J. B. (2011). The naked truth: Revealing the affinity for graphic sexual appeals in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(2), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-51-2-436-448
  83. Roper, S., & S. Alkhalifah, E. (2020). Online shopping in a restrictive society: lessons from Saudi Arabia. Qualitative Market Research, 24(4), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-01-2020-0012
  84. Schover, L. R., Fouladi, R. T., Warneke, C. L., Neese, L., Klein, E. A., Zippe, C., & Kupelian, P. A. (2002). The use of treatments for erectile dysfunction among survivors of prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 95(11), 2397-2407. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10970 Scott, J. E. (1995). The measurement of ınformation systems effectiveness: evaluating a measuring ınstrument. ACM SIGMIS Database, 26(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1145/206476.206484
  85. Seifert, C., & Chattaraman, V. (2017). Too new or too complex? Why consumers’ aesthetic sensitivity matters in apparel design evaluation. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 21(2), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2016-0092
  86. Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001
  87. Şerban, S. (2014). From marketing to semiotics: the way to marketing semiotics. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 2(2), 81-93. Shaw Taylor, L., Fiore, A. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). Out of my league: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 942-954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211409947
  88. Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51(11–12), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
  89. Surjandy, Lisanti, Y., Meyliana, Eni, Y., Cassandra, C., & Kusumaningtyas, A. W. (2021). Analysis of product, product delivery service, and product assurance in e-commerce on purchase intention during the covid-19 pandemic. Proceedings of 2021 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9535048
  90. Takahashi, C., Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Kiyonari, T., & Kanazawa, S. (2006). Attractiveness and cooperation in social exchange. Evolutionary Psychology, 4(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490600400127
  91. Tian, H., Siddik, A. B., & Masukujjaman, M. (2022). Factors affecting the repurchase ıntention of organic tea among millennial consumers: an empirical study. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12020050
  92. Till, B. D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673613
  93. Torresi, I. (2008). Advertising: A case for intersemiotic translation. Meta, 53(1),34-49. https://doi.org/10.7202/017974ar
  94. Van de Sompel, D., & Vermeir, I. (2016). The influence of source attractiveness on self-perception and advertising effectiveness for 6- to 7- year-old children. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(5), 312-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12302
  95. van der Waldt, D. L. R., de Beer, N., & Plessis, N. du. (2007). Attitudes towards attractive and credible celebrities in advertisements: a survey amongst students. Communicare, 26(1), 41-55.
  96. White, L. A., & Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia-erotophilia as a dimension of personality. The Journal of Sex Research, 25(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498809551448
  97. Wiederman, M. W., & Hurst, S. R. (1997). Physical attractiveness, body image, and women’s sexual self-schema. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(4), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00131.x
  98. Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202
  99. Zhong, G. (2019). E-Commerce Consumer Privacy Protection Based on Differential Privacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1168(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1168/3/032084
  100. Zoghaib, A. (2017). The contribution of a brand spokesperson’s voice to consumer-based brand equity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 26(5), 445-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2016-1230
  101. Jones, J. E., Jones, L. L., Calvert, M. J., Damery, S. L., & Mathers, J. M. (2022). A literature review of studies that have compared the use of face-to-face and online focus groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221142406