Journals / Journal of Civil Aviation / 2022 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Alarming Results of the Spatial Attention on Pilot’s Aptitude Testing

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-03-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Among the 78 student pilot candidates, 38 pilot candidates have failed from the pilot aptitude testing’s spatial attention sufficiency parameter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Among safety policies and protocols, which the civil aviation authorities anticipate in order to achieve and maintain prior involvement in monitoring and/or observing behavioral construction, there is a fundamental action.
📊
Key Findings & Data:IATA’s pilot aptitude testing need and guidance declares that the student pilot candidate election programs should contain such parameters that a student pilot candidate must succeed through (IATA,2019).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Among the 78 student pilot candidates, 38 pilot candidates have failed from the pilot aptitude testing’s spatial attention sufficiency parameter.
🔬Design:Rapor
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:attention · pilot aptitude testing · pilot students

Abstract

Among safety policies and protocols, which the civil aviation authorities anticipate in order to achieve and maintain prior involvement in monitoring and/or observing behavioral construction, there is a fundamental action. The authority requires to know whether a candidate has the base line capability of bearing and fulfilling the requirements of the physical and mental pressures of the job on student pilot candidate election programs. IATA’s pilot aptitude testing need and guidance declares that the student pilot candidate election programs should contain such parameters that a student pilot candidate must succeed through (IATA,2019). We operated a test protocol which was compatible with IATA’s demand of competence on a student pilot candidate. With the predetermined success rates of every test protocol battery, we provided results of the tests of spatial attention, with regarding to the feedback from personality test, spatial attention, spatial disorientation, perceptional focusing & memory, spatial aptitude, decision making under stress, team work & leadership. We analyzed the results of the tests and the spatial attention sufficiency requirement has the least success rate in the midst of basic abilities and sophisticated skills which a student pilot candidate has to have. Among the 78 student pilot candidates, 38 pilot candidates have failed from the pilot aptitude testing’s spatial attention sufficiency parameter.

🔖

Cite This Article

Beköz, S., Sarı, F., Sertel, A., Şanlıtürk, G., Çetinkaya, B. (2022). Alarming Results of the Spatial Attention on Pilot’s Aptitude Testing. Journal of Civil Aviation, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1591794

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. O’Hare, D., Wiggins, M., Batt, R., and Morrison, D. (1994). Cognitive failure analysis for aircraft accident investigation. Ergonomics.
  2. Wiegmann, D. & Shappell, S. (1999). Human error and crew resource management failures in Naval aviation mishaps: A review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990-96. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine.
  3. Yacavone, D. W. (1993). Mishap trends and cause factors in Naval aviation: A review of Naval Safety Center data, 1986-90. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine.
  4. International Air Transport Association (2019). Pilot Aptitude Testing Edition 3, Guidance Material and Best Practices.
  5. Wiegmann, D. & Shappell, S. (2001). A Human Error Analysis of Commercial Aviation Accidents Using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS)
  6. Beköz, A. B. & Beköz, Ü. & Çetinkaya, B. (2015) NOVA 1.01: A dynamic psychometric para-test for pilot candidates. The Journal of Civil Aviation.
  7. Fulkerson, S. C., Freud, S. L., & Raynor, G. H. (1958). The use of the MMPI in the psychological evaluation of pilots. Journal of Aviation Medicine. McKinley, J. C., Hathaway, S. R., & Meehl, P. E.
  8. . The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: VI. The K Scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology.
  9. Fleishman, E. A. (1956). Psychomotor selection tests: Research and application in the United States Air Force. Personnel Psychology. Shin, J. (2000). The NASA Aviation Safety Program: Overview.
  10. Stern, R. M., Koch, K. L. (1996). Motion Sickness and Differential Susceptibility. Current Directions in Psycolgical Science.