Especially, there are few works focusing on the situation of the Southwest Caucasus (Kars, Ardahan, Artvin, Iğdır, Adjaria, and Samtskhe-Javakheti) and most of them such as Ender Gökdemir’s “Cenub-i Garbi Kafkas Hükümeti” (1998) and Erkan Karagöz’s “Güneybatı Kafkasya: Siyasal ve Sosyal Mücadeleler Tarihi” (2010) deal with its history from Turkic population’s perspective.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main theme of the book “Kızıl Acaristan Salnamesi (1922) Güneybatı Kafkasya’da Tarih Kimlik ve İdeoloji” is the process of independent “Adjarian” identity after the October Revolution in 1917, which is different from Russian, OttomanTurkish and Georgian identities and this book provides us with some important information about it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main theme of the book “Kızıl Acaristan Salnamesi (1922) Güneybatı Kafkasya’da Tarih Kimlik ve İdeoloji” is the process of independent “Adjarian” identity after the October Revolution in 1917, which is different from Russian, OttomanTurkish and Georgian identities and this book provides us with some important information about it.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Especially, there are few works focusing on the situation of the Southwest Caucasus (Kars, Ardahan, Artvin, Iğdır, Adjaria, and Samtskhe-Javakheti) and most of them such as Ender Gökdemir’s “Cenub-i Garbi Kafkas Hükümeti” (1998) and Erkan Karagöz’s “Güneybatı Kafkasya: Siyasal ve Sosyal Mücadeleler Tarihi” (2010) deal with its history from Turkic population’s perspective.
🔬Design:Book Review
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adjaria · Kızıl Acaristan Salnamesi · identity
Abstract
The main theme of the book “Kızıl Acaristan Salnamesi (1922) Güneybatı Kafkasya’da Tarih Kimlik ve İdeoloji” is the process of independent “Adjarian” identity after the October Revolution in 1917, which is different from Russian, OttomanTurkish and Georgian identities and this book provides us with some important information about it. Especially, there are few works focusing on the situation of the Southwest Caucasus (Kars, Ardahan, Artvin, Iğdır, Adjaria, and Samtskhe-Javakheti) and most of them such as Ender Gökdemir’s “Cenub-i Garbi Kafkas Hükümeti” (1998) and Erkan Karagöz’s “Güneybatı Kafkasya: Siyasal ve Sosyal Mücadeleler Tarihi” (2010) deal with its history from Turkic population’s perspective.
Wakizaka, K. (2019). Kızıl Acaristan Salnamesi (1922) Güneybatı Kafkasya’da Tarih Kimlik ve İdeoloji. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1591411