Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2020 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Does Cervical Length Predict the Successful Labor Induction in Term Nulliparous Women Who Had Unfavorable Cervix?

Pages
540–545
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study indicates that CL measurement is a highly effective method to predict labor induced, particularly in nulliparous and having unfavorable cervix.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of cervical length (CL) measurement in the result of labor induction in term nulliparous women who had a strict cervix.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 78 pregnancies were evaluated prospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study indicates that CL measurement is a highly effective method to predict labor induced, particularly in nulliparous and having unfavorable cervix.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of cervical length (CL) measurement in the result of labor induction in term nulliparous women who had a strict cervix. A total of 78 pregnancies were evaluated prospectively. Dinoprostone ovule was used for the induction of labor in all cases. Low dose oxytocin was administered for augmentation of the labor. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 24. A p-value <0.05 was determined as to be statistically significant. Dinoprostone's indication for labor induction was seen in 57.7% of cases at post-term pregnancy and unsafe fetal wellbeing observed in the remaining 42.3% of the patients. 59% of patients delivered their babies vaginally, and we performed a cesarean section in 41% of patients. The most cesarean indication was fetal distress (40.6%). The arrest of labor was considered in 31.2% of the patients and failed labor induction was observed in 28.1% of the patients. A significant correlation was found between CL and successful labor induction. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CL was: 0.6975 (95% CI: 0.5816-0.8134). The sensitivity and specificity of CL≤ 20 mm were 94% and 45%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values associated with it were 57% and 90%. Sensitivity was 23%, and specificity was 84% at the CL≥ 30 mm cut-off point. There was no significant difference between umbilical cord pH and the route of delivery (p: 0.185). Our study indicates that CL measurement is a highly effective method to predict labor induced, particularly in nulliparous and having unfavorable cervix.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURKYILMAZ, G., TURKYILMAZ, S. E., ERTÜRK, E., KARAASLAN, O. (2020). Does Cervical Length Predict the Successful Labor Induction in Term Nulliparous Women Who Had Unfavorable Cervix?. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 540–545. https://ajindex.com/articles/159109

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cole RA, Howie PW, Magnaughton MC. Elective induction of labor. A randomized prospective trial. Lancet 1975; 1: 767-770
  2. Sue-A-Quan AK, Hannah ME, Cohen MM, Foster GA, Liston RM. Effect of labor induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in postterm pregnancies. CMAJ 1999; 160: 1145-1149
  3. Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003 4. Arulkumararan S, Gibb DM, Tambyraja RL, Heng SH, Ratnam SS. Failed induction of labor. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 25: 190-193
  4. Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A. Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 27: 309-311
  5. Sanches-Ramos L. Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005; 32: 181-200
  6. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: Final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003; 52:1-113
  7. Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Devoe LD. Bishop score: A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 1998; 91: 248-252
  8. Kehila M, Bougmiza I, Ben Hamıd R, Wabere A, Mahjoub S. Bishop score vs. cervical ultrasound length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women. Minerva Ginecol 2015; 67: 499-505
  9. Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 2006; 21: 34-38
  10. Park KH, Kim SN, Lee SY, Jeong EH, Jung HJ, Oh KJ. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 198-204
  11. Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N. Pre induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labor in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 47: 389-393
  12. Cubal A, Carvalho J, Ferreira MJ, Rodrigues G, Carmo O.D. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013; 39: 1391-1396
  13. Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, et al. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 357-362
  14. S.M. Rane, R Guirgis, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction