Journals / Ağrı / 2015 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

The donor site pain assessment of the patients who were reconstructed split-thickness graft

Kısmi kalınlıkta deri grefti uygulanan hastalarda donör alanı ağrısının değerlendirilmesi

Journal
Ağrı
Pages
205–209
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the pain evaluation of the donor area has to be assessed by the nurse on the first day after surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Summary Objectives: İn this study we examined the donor site pain intensity of the patients who were reconstructed by split thickness skin graft (STSG) due to tissue defect.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sam- pling selection wasn’t made, all (31) cases were studied with STSG in 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the pain evaluation of the donor area has to be assessed by the nurse on the first day after surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Summary Objectives: İn this study we examined the donor site pain intensity of the patients who were reconstructed by split thickness skin graft (STSG) due to tissue defect. Methods: This descriptive study was performed in a Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic of a State Hospital in Istanbul. Sam- pling selection wasn’t made, all (31) cases were studied with STSG in 2013. As data collection forms, we used Patient Information Form and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In the analysis of the data percentage, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used. Results: 38.71% of the patients were female and 61.29% were male. It was determined that grafting application was mostly made in the lower extremity and 61% of the patients were able to perform individual functions independently. It was ob- served that pain intensity increased as the donor area expanded. It was also determined that semi-dependent patients’ pain intensity was higher than independent patients’ . In 64.52% of the patients graft donor area was wider than 10cm². The post- operative pain intensity of the patients who were reconstructed by STSG in the lower extremity was higher than patients who were reconstructed by STSG in the upper extremity area. Conclusion: It was observed that the donor area pain intensity of patients was the most severe on the first day after surgery and the least severe on the sixth day after surgery. In conclusion, the pain evaluation of the donor area has to be assessed by the nurse on the first day after surgery.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada doku defekti nedeniyle, kısmi kalınlıkta deri grefti (KKDG) uygulanan hastalarda donör alanı ağrı şiddeti incelendi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu tanımlayıcı çalışma İstanbul’da bir kamu hastanesinin, Plastik ve Rekonstrüktif Cerrahi Kliniğinde gerçek- leştirildi. Örneklem seçimi yapılmadı, 2013 yılında KKDG yapılmış olguların tümü (n=31) ile çalışıldı. Veri toplama aracı olarak, Hasta Bilgi Formu ve Görsel Ağrı Değerlendirme Ölçeği (VAS) kullanıldı. Verilerin analizinde, yüzdelik, ortalama, Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların %38.71 kadın, %61.29’u erkekti. Greftleme uygulamasının en çok alt ekstremite bölgesinde yapıldığı, %61’inin bireysel fonksiyonlarını bağımsız gerçekleştirebildiği, ayrıca yarı bağımlı olan hastaların ağrı şiddetinin, bağımsız olan hastalardan daha fazla olduğu saptandı. Donör alanı genişledikçe ağrı şiddetinin arttığı gözlendi. Hastaların %64.52’sinde greft donör alanı 10 cm²‘den daha genişti, Alt ekstremitede KKDG ile onarım yapılan hastaların postoperatif ağrı şiddetinin, üst eks- tremite alanında onarım yapılan hastalardan daha yüksek olduğu gözlendi. Sonuç: KKDG ile onarım yapılan hastaların donör alanı ağrı şiddetinin ameliyat sonrası birinci gün en yüksek, altıncı gün en düşük olduğu gözlendi. Sonuç olarak donör alanı ağrı değerlendirilmesinin özellikle ameliyat sonrası birinci günde hemşireler tarafından mutlaka yapılması gerektiği sonucuna varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

DELİCE, E. Y., ULUS, B. (2015). The donor site pain assessment of the patients who were reconstructed split-thickness graft. Ağrı, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 205–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/158987

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Paletta CE, Pokorny JJ, Rumbolo P. Skin grafts. In: Plastic surgery. Mathes SJ, editor. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 1990. p. 293–316
  2. Tan Ö, Atik B, Ergen D, Acemoğlu H. Compare of dry open and wet closed dressing technique in split thickness skin grafts. Van Medical Journal 2007;14(1):1–5
  3. Bilgiç Mİ, Akan M, Çalıkapan GT, Aköz T. Effectiveness of Emla in split thickness skin graft donor site pain manage- ment. Turk Plast Surg 2008;15(3):150–4
  4. Grabb WC. Basic technique of plastic surgery. In: Grabb WC, Simth JW, editors. Tissue Transplation Plastic Surgery. in Plastic Surgery. 4th ed. Boston: Little Brown and Com- pany; 1979. p. 1–74
  5. Brown JB, McDowell F. Massive repairs of burns with thick split-skin grafts: emergency “dressings” with homografts. Ann Surg 1942;115(4):658–74
  6. Erdine S. Post operatif aneljezi. Ağrı sendromları ve tedavi- si. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2003
  7. Arslan S, Çelebioğlu A. Postoperatif ağrı yönetimi ve al- ternatif uygulamalar. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi 2004;2–6
  8. Büyükyılmaz F, Aştı T. Ameliyat sonrası ağrıda hemşirelik bakımı. Atatürk Üniversitesi HYO Dergisi 2009;12(2):84–92
  9. Bilen A. Postoperatif ağrı tedavisi. Klinik Gelişim 2007;1(68):37–44
  10. Roper N, Logan WW, Tierney JA. The elements of nursing: A model for nursing based on a model of living. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Harcourt Brace and Co; 1996
  11. Richards J, Hubbert AO. Experiences of expert nurses in ca- ring for patients with postoperative pain. Pain Manag Nurs 2007;8(1):17–24
  12. Moise P. A new approach to dressing split thickness skin graft donor sites. Plast Surg Nurs 1985;5(2):65
  13. McCain D, Sutherland S. Nursing essentials: skin grafts for patients with burns. Am J Nurs 1998;98(7):34–9
  14. Spear M, Bailey A. Treatment of skin graft donor sites with a unique transparent absorbent acrylic dressing. Plast Surg Nurs 2009;29(4):194–202
  15. Demirtas Y, Yagmur C, Soylemez F, Ozturk N, Demir A. Ma- nagement of split-thickness skin graft donor site: a pros- pective clinical trial for comparison of five different dres- sing materials. Burns 2010;36(7):999–1005
  16. Higgins L, Wasiak J, Spinks A, Cleland H. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized control- led trial comparing polyurethane with calcium alginate dressings. Int Wound J 2012;9(2):126–31
  17. Healy C, Greig AV, Murphy AD, Powell C, Pinder RJ, Saour S, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial: fibrin sea-