Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience

Pages
200–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Coil, FDS or both can be used in selected cases of ruptured or unruptured aneurysms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Intracranial aneurysms (IA) are vascular anomalies that are mostly detected by life threatening complications such as intracerebral hematoma or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, our objectives were to describe the clinical data of the patients with treated IAs, to evaluate the success rate of two treatment modalities [coil embolization and flow diverter stents (FDS)], and to document common complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Coil, FDS or both can be used in selected cases of ruptured or unruptured aneurysms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims: Intracranial aneurysms (IA) are vascular anomalies that are mostly detected by life threatening complications such as intracerebral hematoma or subarachnoid hemorrhage. Recently endovascular treatments have become the major treatment modality. In this study, our objectives were to describe the clinical data of the patients with treated IAs, to evaluate the success rate of two treatment modalities [coil embolization and flow diverter stents (FDS)], and to document common complications. Methods: The patients who were admitted to our tertiary center and underwent endovascular treatment (with coil embolization/FDS) in the interventional radiology unit between December 2018 and October 2019 were enrolled. The clinical data of the patients including aneurysm size, subtype, location, treatment modality, and pre and post procedural complications were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Eighteen of 37 patients (48.6%) were male and 19 (51.3%) were female. The median age was 54 (minimum-maximum; 12-77) years. There was no predisposing factor in the clinical history except four patients. Regarding the aneurysm subtypes, 89% of IAs were saccular and 11% were fusiform. The most common localization was internal carotid artery (48%). Ten patients were admitted with ruptured aneurysm and twenty seven were asymptomatic and unruptured. Four patients died in the mean follow-up of nine months. Two patients had intervention-related complication (hemiparesis and hydrocephalus). Conclusions: IAs can be effectively treated with endovascular techniques since cure rates are high and complications rates are reasonably low. Coil, FDS or both can be used in selected cases of ruptured or unruptured aneurysms.

🔖

Cite This Article

YUCE, G., TAŞAR, M. (2020). Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single Center Experience. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 3, 200–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/158903

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via an endovascular approach. Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:8-14.
  2. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267-1274.
  3. Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J. Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology. 1998;206:499-510.
  4. Cognard C, Weill A, Spelle L, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology. 1999;62:348-356.
  5. Zhang Y, Chong W, Qian Y. Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:608-615.
  6. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:632-642.
  7. Meyer FB, Morita A, Puumala MR, Nichols DA. Medical and surgical management of intracranial aneurysms. Mayo Clin proc. 1995;70:153-172. Mohr JP. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Churchill Livingstone;2004.
  8. Zhao J, Lin H, Summers R, Yang M, Cousins BG, Tsui J. Current Treatment Strategies for Intracranial Aneurysms: An Overview. J Angiology. 2018;69:17-30.
  9. Gawlitza M, Soize S, Barbe C, et al. Aneurysm Characteristics, Study Population, and Endovascular Techniques for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in a Large, Prospective, Multicenter Cohort: Results of the Analysis of Recanalization After Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm Study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:517-523. Ovül I. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH). In: Altınors N, Baykaner K, Sekerci Z, Ozyurt E, Caner H, eds. Basic Neurosurgery, Ankara;1997:1-18.
  10. Jagadeesan BD, Siddiq F, Grande AW, Tummala RP. Modified balloon assisted coil embolization for the treatment of intracranial and cervical arterial aneurysms using coaxial dual lumen balloon microcatheters: initial experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:704-707.
  11. Pukenas B, Albuquerque FC, Weigele JB, Hurst RW, Stiefel MF. Use of a New Double-Lumen Balloon Catheter for Single-Catheter Balloon-Assisted Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms: Technical Note. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(1 Suppl Operative):8-12.
  12. Ihn YK, Shin SH, Bai