Journals / International Electronic Journal of Algebra / 2019 / Volume: 26 Issue: 26

EXTENDING TABLE ALGEBRAS TO HOPF ALGEBRAS

Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-07-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Let $A$ be a table algebra with standard basis $\mathbf{B}$, multiplication $\mu$, unit map $\eta$, skew-linear involution $*$, and degree map $\delta$.  In this article we study the possible coalgebra structures $(A,\Delta, \delta)$ on $A$ for which $(A, \mu, \eta, \Delta, \delta)$ becomes a Hopf algebra with respect to some antipode.  We show that such Hopf algebra structures are not always available for noncommutative table algebras.  On the other hand, commutative table algebras will always have a Hopf algebra structure induced from an algebra-isomorphic group algebra.  To illustrate our approach, we derive Hopf algebra comultiplications on table algebras of dimension 2 and 3.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Let $A$ be a table algebra with standard basis $\mathbf{B}$, multiplication $\mu$, unit map $\eta$, skew-linear involution $*$, and degree map $\delta$.  In this article we study the possible coalgebra structures $(A,\Delta, \delta)$ on $A$ for which $(A, \mu, \eta, \Delta, \delta)$ becomes a Hopf algebra with respect to some antipode.  We show that such Hopf algebra structures are not always available for noncommutative table algebras.  On the other hand, commutative table algebras will always have a Hopf algebra structure induced from an algebra-isomorphic group algebra.  To illustrate our approach, we derive Hopf algebra comultiplications on table algebras of dimension 2 and 3.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Let $A$ be a table algebra with standard basis $\mathbf{B}$, multiplication $\mu$, unit map $\eta$, skew-linear involution $*$, and degree map $\delta$.  In this article we study the possible coalgebra structures $(A,\Delta, \delta)$ on $A$ for which $(A, \mu, \eta, \Delta, \delta)$ becomes a Hopf algebra with respect to some antipode.  We show that such Hopf algebra structures are not always available for noncommutative table algebras.  On the other hand, commutative table algebras will always have a Hopf algebra structure induced from an algebra-isomorphic group algebra.  To illustrate our approach, we derive Hopf algebra comultiplications on table algebras of dimension 2 and 3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Let $A$ be a table algebra with standard basis $\mathbf{B}$, multiplication $\mu$, unit map $\eta$, skew-linear involution $*$, and degree map $\delta$.  In this article we study the possible coalgebra structures $(A,\Delta, \delta)$ on $A$ for which $(A, \mu, \eta, \Delta, \delta)$ becomes a Hopf algebra with respect to some antipode.  We show that such Hopf algebra structures are not always available for noncommutative table algebras.  On the other hand, commutative table algebras will always have a Hopf algebra structure induced from an algebra-isomorphic group algebra.  To illustrate our approach, we derive Hopf algebra comultiplications on table algebras of dimension 2 and 3.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Table algebra · Hopf algebra · fusion ring

Abstract

Let $A$ be a table algebra with standard basis $\mathbf{B}$, multiplication $\mu$, unit map $\eta$, skew-linear involution $*$, and degree map $\delta$.  In this article we study the possible coalgebra structures $(A,\Delta, \delta)$ on $A$ for which $(A, \mu, \eta, \Delta, \delta)$ becomes a Hopf algebra with respect to some antipode.  We show that such Hopf algebra structures are not always available for noncommutative table algebras.  On the other hand, commutative table algebras will always have a Hopf algebra structure induced from an algebra-isomorphic group algebra.  To illustrate our approach, we derive Hopf algebra comultiplications on table algebras of dimension 2 and 3.

🔖

Cite This Article

Herman, A., Singh, G. (2019). EXTENDING TABLE ALGEBRAS TO HOPF ALGEBRAS. International Electronic Journal of Algebra, Volume: 26 Issue: 26. https://doi.org/10.24330/ieja.586882

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. H. I. Blau, Table algebras, European J. Combin., 30(6) (2009), 1426-1455.
  2. A. Hanaki, Character products of association schemes, J. Algebra, 283(2) (2005), 596-603.
  3. A. Herman, M. Muzychuk and B. Xu, The recognition problem for table algebras and reality-based algebras, J. Algebra, 479 (2017), 173-191.
  4. A. Masuoka, Semisimple Hopf algebras of dimension 6,8, Israel J. Math., 92 (1995), 361-373.
  5. A. Masuoka, The p^n theorem for semisimple Hopf algebras, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 124 (1996), 735-737.
  6. D. E. Radford, Hopf Algebras, Series on Knots and Everything, 49, World Scienti c Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2012.
  7. Y. Zhu, Hopf algebras of prime dimension, Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 1 (1994), 53-59.