Journals / Experimental Biomedical Research / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Cervical lymphadenopathy in tularemia: the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating lymphadenopathies due to metastatic tumors

Pages
239–247
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Microagglutination tests would be useful for differentiation; however, DW-MRI might also be useful for differentiation and may expedite the diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in differentiating enlarged cervical lymph nodes due to tularemia and metastatic tumors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We evaluated 59 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy (LAP) (32 patients with tularemia, 27 patients with metastatic tumors), retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Microagglutination tests would be useful for differentiation; however, DW-MRI might also be useful for differentiation and may expedite the diagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in differentiating enlarged cervical lymph nodes due to tularemia and metastatic tumors. Methods: We evaluated 59 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy (LAP) (32 patients with tularemia, 27 patients with metastatic tumors), retrospectively. We analyzed contrast enhancement patterns of LAP in postcontrast fat sat T1WI. We evaluated T2, DWI, and ADC signals of LAP in a 5-point scale system. Moreover, the mean ADC values of solid and necrotic LAP in both groups were quantitatively measured and compared statistically. Receiver operating characteristic curves of quantitative ADC values were obtained to determine the diagnostic performance. Results: There was no difference between solid and necrotic LAP enhancement patterns in two groups. Solid LAP and peripheral parts of necrotic LAP showed diffusion restriction, whereas central parts necrotic LAP had high ADC and low DWI signal in both tularemia and metastatic groups. Signal characteristics were similar in two groups. In solid LAP, there was no significant difference between ADC values in two groups. In necrotic LAP, total, central, and peripheral quantitative ADC measurements were higher in the metastatic group than in the tularemia group. Conclusions: Conventional MRI findings were not sufficient to differentiate metastatic LAP from tularemia. DW-MRI was not helpful in solid LAP; however, ADC values ​​of metastatic necrotic LAP were significantly higher than tularemia. Microagglutination tests would be useful for differentiation; however, DW-MRI might also be useful for differentiation and may expedite the diagnosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

HIZAL, M., BASDEMİRCİ, O., KALAYCIOĞLU, O. (2020). Cervical lymphadenopathy in tularemia: the role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating lymphadenopathies due to metastatic tumors. Experimental Biomedical Research, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 239–247. https://ajindex.com/articles/158709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Rinaldo A, Bradley PJ, Ferlito A. Tularemia in otolaryngology: a forgotten but not gone disease and a possible sign of bioterrorism. J Laryngol Otol. 2004;118(4):257-59
  2. Atmaca S, Bayraktar C, Cengel S, et al. tularemia is becoming increasingly important as a differential diagnosis in suspicious neck masses: experience in Turkey. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 266(10):1595-98
  3. Cağlı S, Vural A, Sönmez O, et al. Tularemia: a rare cause of neck mass, evaluation of 33 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(12):1699-1704
  4. Arikan OK, Koç C, Bozdoğan O. Tularemia presenting as tonsillopharyngitis and cervical lymphadenitis: A case report and review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;260(6): 298-300
  5. Widmann G, Henninger B, Kremser C, et al. MRI Sequences in Head&Neck Radiology - State of the Art. Rofo. 2017;189(5):413-22
  6. Das A, Bhalla AS, Sharma R, et al. Benign neck masses showing restricted diffusion: Is there a histological basis for discordant behavior? World J Radiol. 2016;8(2):174- 82
  7. Attariwala R, Picker W. Whole body MRI: Improved lesion detection and characterization with diffusion weighted techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(2):253-68
  8. Driessen JP, van Kempen PM, van der Heijden GJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review. Head Neck. 2015;37(3):440-48
  9. Doğan S, Ekinci A, Demiraslan H, et al. Ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT findings of tularemia in the neck. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016; 22(5):430–35
  10. Herneth AM, Mayerhoefer M, Schernthaner R, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging: Lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76(3):398-406
  11. Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, et al. Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA. 2001; 285(21):2763-73
  12. Herneth AM, Czerny C, Krestan C. Role of diffusion weighted MRI in the characterization of lymph node metastasis. In: XVI international congress of head and neck radiology; 2003 September 4-6; Frankfurt, p. 604-10
  13. Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72(3):381-87
  14. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Verslype C, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI provides additional value to conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(10):2456–66
  15. AbdelRazek AA, Soli