SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Trust and Capability in Supply Chain on Firm Performance through Supply Chain Agility and Collaborative Advantage

Murat ÇEMBERCİ
Mustafa Emre CİVELEK
Pages
440–453
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, transformation of the agility into the capability or transformation of the trust into the collaborative advantage can help to explain the effects of these dimensions on the firm performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – In this research, an integrated model is proposed to explore the effects of trust, agility, collaborative advantage and capability dimensions on firm performance and how they interact with one another.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In some of the research in the literature, the effect of the dimensions that are trust in supply chain, supply chain agility, collaborative advantage in supply chain and supply chain capability on firm performance has been empirically proven.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, transformation of the agility into the capability or transformation of the trust into the collaborative advantage can help to explain the effects of these dimensions on the firm performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – In this research, an integrated model is proposed to explore the effects of trust, agility, collaborative advantage and capability dimensions on firm performance and how they interact with one another. In some of the research in the literature, the effect of the dimensions that are trust in supply chain, supply chain agility, collaborative advantage in supply chain and supply chain capability on firm performance has been empirically proven. Yet, no research exists in the literature that explains the indirect effects of these dimensions through one another. Consequently, this study aims to close this gap in the extant literature. Design/methodology/approach – Structural equation modelling method was utilised to test the hypotheses of this study. Quantitative data was obtained by means of survey in a five-point Likert scale. Initially, confirmatory faction analyses and reliability analysis were performed respectively to determine the validity and reliability of the scale. The analyses were performed with SPSS and AMOS statistics programs. Findings – As a result of the data analyses and tests of hypotheses conducted in this study, it has been empirically proven that supply chain agility and collaborative advantage in supply chain are indirectly and directly influenced by trust in the supply chain. These results are in accordance with the extant literature. Discussion – Knowing the expectations of the customers is crucial for firms in today's business environment. The reason for this is that firms need to manage external business processes in order not to be affected by uncertainty in customers’ needs. Therefore, the effects of supply chain management on firm performance have begun to be studied more in recent years. In other words, transformation of the agility into the capability or transformation of the trust into the collaborative advantage can help to explain the effects of these dimensions on the firm performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEMBERCİ, M., CİVELEK, M. E. (2020). The Effects of Trust and Capability in Supply Chain on Firm Performance through Supply Chain Agility and Collaborative Advantage. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 440–453. https://ajindex.com/articles/158671

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AE Akgün, H Keskin, JC Byrne, S Aren. (2007). Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation 27 (9), 501-513.
  2. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin. Ansoff, H. (1988). The New Corporate Strategy. New York: Wiley. Bagchi, P., & Skjoett-Larsen, T. (2005). Supply chain integration: a survey. International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 275-294.
  3. Bartels, R. (1976). The History of Marketing Thought, 2nd Edition, Colombus OH: Publishing Horizons. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing Method Variance in Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices: The Case of Self-reported Affect and Perceptions at Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 547-560.
  4. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 19(1), 99- 120. Bechtel, C., and Jayaram, J. (1997). Supply Chain Management: A Strategic Perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management 8(1), 15-34
  5. Blome, C., Schoenherr, T., & Rexhausen, D. (2013). Antecedents and enablers of SC agility and its effect on performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 1295-1318.
  6. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). SC collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29, 163-180.
  7. Chandra, C., & Kumar, S. (2000). Supply chain management in theory and practise: a passing fad or a afundamental change. Industrial Management & Data Systems (1003), 13-100.
  8. Civelek, M. (2018). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi Metodolojisi. İstanbul:
  9. Beta. Çemberci, M. (2012). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Performansının Göstergeleri ve Firma Performansı Üzerine Etkileri: Kavramsal Model Önerisi. İstanbul:
  10. Akademik Titiz Yayınları.
  11. David, M., & Gligor, C. (2015). Performance Outcomes of SC Agility: When Should You Be Agile? Journal of Production Management, 33(34), 71-82.
  12. Day, G. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of, 58(4), 37-52.
  13. Day, M., Lichtenstein, S., & Samouel, P. (2015). Supply management capabilities, routine bundles and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 1-13.
  14. DeGroote, S., & Marx, T. (2013). The impact of IT on supply chain agility and firm performa