Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Antegrade Ureteral Stenting: Our Clinical Experience

Antegrad Üreteral Stentler: Klinik Deneyimimiz)

Pages
8–14
Publication Date
2010-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Antegrade ureteric stent insertion is a safe, reliable, and relatively easy treatment option in ureteric obstruction with acceptable complications rates

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Ureteral stents generally are inserted in retrograde positon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: Ureteral stent was inserted to 26 patients as antegrade to relieve ureteral obstruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Antegrade ureteric stent insertion is a safe, reliable, and relatively easy treatment option in ureteric obstruction with acceptable complications rates
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üreter · obstrüksiyon · tedavi

Abstract

Introduction: Ureteral stents generally are inserted in retrograde positon. However, in some situations it is difficult to insert a retrograd stent. At this point, there are few alternatives such as percutaneous nephrostomy, antegrade stenting and open operation. Patients and Methods: Ureteral stent was inserted to 26 patients as antegrade to relieve ureteral obstruction. All patients were evaluated with detailed medical history, physical examination, plain abdominal graphy, urinary ultrasonography, urinalysis, urinary culture, routine hematologic, and biochemical analysis. Results: The mean age of the patients was 56.36±4.1 (range 47 to 71) years. Urinary tract infection was relatively common (26.9%) after stent insertion. Seven stent placement were performed for benign ureteral obstruction and for 19 malign disease. The procedure was technically successful in 22 (84.61%)of 26 patients, and stent placement was performed as a one-stageprocedure. Antegrade stenting was not succesful in four cases. In four case, nephrostomy was inserted. Conclusions: Antegrade ureteric stent insertion is a safe, reliable, and relatively easy treatment option in ureteric obstruction with acceptable complications rates

Özet

Giriş: Üreteral stentler genellikle retrograd pozisyonda yerleĢtirilmektedirler. Bununla birlikte bazı durumlarda retrograd olarak stent yerleĢtirmek oldukça zordur. Bu durumda perkütan nefrostomi, antegrad stent yerleĢtirme ve açık operasyon gibi alternatifler bulunmaktadır. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Ureteral stentler 26 olguya üreteral obstrüksiyonu gidermek için antegrad olarak yerleĢtirildi. Hastalar ayrıntılı öykü, fizik muayene, direk üriner sistem grafisi, üriner ultrasonografi, idrar tahlili, idrar kültürü, rutin hematolojik ve biyokimyasal tetkiklerle değerlendirildiler. Bulgular: Hastaların ortalama yaĢları 56.36±4.1 (47-71) yıldı. Üriner sistem infeksiyonu stent yerleĢtirilmesi sonrası %26.9 oranındaydı. Toplam 7 hastada benign 19 hastada ise malign nedenlerle antegrad stent yerleĢtirildi. Antegrad stent yerleĢtirme 26 hastanın 22‘sinde (%84.61) baĢarılıydı. Toplam 4 olguda antegrad stent yerleĢtirme baĢarılı değildi. Bu dört olguya nefrostomi yerleĢtirildi. Sonuçlar: Antegrad üreteral stent yerleĢtirme kabul edilebilir komplikasyon oranları ile üreteral obstrüksiyonların tedavisinde güvenli ve nispeten kolay bir iĢlemdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kilciler, M., Üstünöz, B., Erdemir, F. (2010). Antegrade Ureteral Stenting: Our Clinical Experience. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 8–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/1586621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...