Journals / Eurasian Journal of Anthropology / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 1

In pursuit of gnosis: dual cosmology and the transformation of the demiurge in Yazidism

Çakır Ceyhan Suvari(Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings demonstrate that theological truth in Yazidism is not merely believed, but sensorially experienced and enacted in sacred space, positioning Lalish as the epistemological center of Gnostic memory and renewal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Yazidism has long been interpreted within the frameworks of heterodox Islam, Zoroastrian survivals, or syncretic Near Eastern traditions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yazidism operates as a living and transformed expression of Gnostic thought.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings demonstrate that theological truth in Yazidism is not merely believed, but sensorially experienced and enacted in sacred space, positioning Lalish as the epistemological center of Gnostic memory and renewal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yazidism · Gnosticism · dual cosmology

Abstract

Yazidism has long been interpreted within the frameworks of heterodox Islam, Zoroastrian survivals, or syncretic Near Eastern traditions. This article argues that such approaches overlook a deeper cosmological affinity. Yazidism operates as a living and transformed expression of Gnostic thought. Based on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Lalish during the period of ISIS attacks in 2015, this study examines how dual cosmology, the role of Melek Tavus, and embodied ritual practices disclose a sophisticated Gnostic epistemology. The Yazidi cosmological order constructs an ontological hierarchy between the transcendent creator (Khuda) and the immanent demiurgic power (Melek Tavus), while articulating knowledge (gnosis) as the path of return to the primordial source. Rituals—such as barefoot entry into the sacred precinct, purification at Ava Zimzim, navigation through spatial darkness into light, and the veneration of the serpent motif—function as performative mechanisms through which sacred knowledge is embodied and remembered. Rather than a passive remnant of ancient traditions, Yazidism actively sustains and transforms Gnostic structures of meaning. The findings demonstrate that theological truth in Yazidism is not merely believed, but sensorially experienced and enacted in sacred space, positioning Lalish as the epistemological center of Gnostic memory and renewal.

🔖

Cite This Article

Suvari, Ç. C. (2026). In pursuit of gnosis: dual cosmology and the transformation of the demiurge in Yazidism. Eurasian Journal of Anthropology, Volume: 16 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1585457

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Allison C. (2001) The Yazidi oral tradition in Iraqi Kurdistan. Richmond: Curzon Press.
  2. Connerton P. (1989) How societies remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Eliade M. (1959) The sacred and the profane: the nature of religion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  4. Floramo G. (2005) Gnostisizm tarihi (SA Baş, B Baş, Trans.). İstanbul: Litera Yayıncılık.
  5. Guest JS. (2001) Yazidilerin tarihi (İ Bingöl, Trans.). İstanbul: Avesta Yayınları.
  6. King KL. (2003) What is Gnosticism? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  7. Kreyenbroek PG. (1995) Yazidism: its background, observances and textual tradition. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.
  8. Layard AH. (2000) Ninova ve kalıntıları (Z Avşar, Trans.). İstanbul: Avesta Yayınları.
  9. Lescot R. (2001) Yazidiler (A Meral, Trans.). İstanbul: Avesta Yayınları.
  10. Martin S. (2010) Gnostikler: İlk Hristiyan sapkınlar (EÇ Babaoğlu, Trans.). İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
  11. Merleau-Ponty M. (2017) Algının fenomenolojisi (E Sarıkartal, E Hacımutluoğlu, Trans.). İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
  12. Omarkhali K. (2017) The Yazidi religious textual tradition: from oral to written. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  13. Özbudun S. (2004) Hermes’ten İdris’e: bir dinsel geleneğin dönüşüm dinamikleri. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
  14. Sever E. (1996) Yazidilik ve Yazidiliğin kökeni. İstanbul: Berfin Yayınları.
  15. Suvari ÇC. (2019) Ezidiler: etnodinsel bir inanç olarak Ezidilik. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınları.
  16. Turner V. (1969) The ritual process: structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.
  17. Williams MA. (1996) Rethinking “Gnosticism”: an argument for dismantling a dubious category. Princeton: Princeton University Press.