Journals / Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review / 2020 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Reason and Revelation from the Perspective of an Extraordinary Salafi Abū al-Wafā’ Ibn ʿAqīl

Hatice Kübra İmamoğlugil(Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University)0000-0002-9279-4586
Pages
119–128
Publication Date
2020-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thusly, a correct understanding of revelation is only possible by using the mind/by putting the mind into action correctly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between reason and revelation has been on the agenda of Islamic scholars for a long time and it has been discussed as an essential argument with regard to developing the source of religious epistemology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Salafist approach represents the most traditionalist fundamental religious idea of Islam, they subordinate the reason to the revelation and hence they consider the revelation and religious narrations as a pure and the only source.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thusly, a correct understanding of revelation is only possible by using the mind/by putting the mind into action correctly.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ibn ʿAqīl · reason · revelation

Abstract

The relationship between reason and revelation has been on the agenda of Islamic scholars for a long time and it has been discussed as an essential argument with regard to developing the source of religious epistemology. The Salafist approach represents the most traditionalist fundamental religious idea of Islam, they subordinate the reason to the revelation and hence they consider the revelation and religious narrations as a pure and the only source. Ibn ʿAqīl was a member of the Salafi/Hanbali scholars and he had some counter-view/discourses against intellectual tradition that he belonged to. He attached great importance to reason and this is the most notable discourse in his doctrine. Also, this is an indication of his traditionalist approach and meanwhile, he tends towards rationalism. The main argument of Ibn ʿAqīl regarding the relationship between reason and revelation is the compatibility of reason and revelation. Reason confirms revelation and revelation agrees with reason. So, there is no contradiction or conflict between reason and revelation. Thusly, a correct understanding of revelation is only possible by using the mind/by putting the mind into action correctly.

🔖

Cite This Article

İmamoğlugil, H. K. (2020). The Relationship between Reason and Revelation from the Perspective of an Extraordinary Salafi Abū al-Wafā’ Ibn ʿAqīl. Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 119–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/1585305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abrahamov, Binyamin. İslam Kelâmı: Gelenekçilik ve Akılcılık. Tr. trans. Emine Buket Sağlam. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2010.
  2. Al-Baṣrī, Abū al-Hussain. Kitāb al-Muʻtamad fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Ed. Muḥammad Ḥamīdullāh. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1964-5.
  3. Al-Farrā’, Abū Yaʻlā. Mukhtaṣar al-Muʻtamad fī Uṣūl ad-Dīn. Ed. Vedīʻ Zeydān Ḥaddād. Beirut: Dār al-Mashriq, 1974.
  4. Al-Juwaynī, Abū al-Maʻālī. Kitabü’l-İrşād: İnanç Esasları Kılavuzu. Tr. trans. A. Bülent Baloğlu, Mehmet İlhan, Sabri Yılmaz and Faruk Sancar. Ankara: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, 2012.
  5. Ibn ʿAqīl, Abū al-Wafā’. Al-Waḍīḥ fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Ed. George Makdisi. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 2010.
  6. Ibn ʿAqīl, Abū al-Wafā’. Kitāb al-Funūn. Ed. George Makdisi. Beirut: Institut de Letters Orientales, 1970-1.
  7. Ibn Rajab, Abū al-Faraj. Dhail ʻalā Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanābila, I-V. Ed. ʻAbdurraḥmān b. Sulaymān al-ʻUthaymīn. Riyad: Maktaba al-Ubaykān, 2005.
  8. Makdisi, George. Ibn ‘Aqil: Religion and Culture in Classical Islam. Edin-burgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.
  9. Makdisi, George. Ibn 'Aqīl et la Résurgence de l'Islam Traditionaliste au XIe Siècle (Ve Siècle de l'Hégire). Damas: Institut Français de Damas, 1963.