Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2

Correlation of ADC values measured using 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and SUVs from fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Pages
72–79
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Pretreatment ADC values and SUVs in HNSSCs are reproducible and independent biomarkers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of our study was to assess the correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and standardized uptake values (SUVs) and their correlations with tumor size, tumor stage and histological grade in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSSCs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective study included 36 patients with histologically confirmed HNSSCs visible on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET/CT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Pretreatment ADC values and SUVs in HNSSCs are reproducible and independent biomarkers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims: The aim of our study was to assess the correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and standardized uptake values (SUVs) and their correlations with tumor size, tumor stage and histological grade in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSSCs). Methods: This retrospective study included 36 patients with histologically confirmed HNSSCs visible on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET/CT). Correlations of minimum ADC (ADCmin), mean ADC (ADCmean), and minimum-mean ADC ratio (ADCmin/mean) with maximum SUV (SUVmax) and lean body mass SUVlbm (SUVlbm) were analyzed using the Spearman’s correlation test. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess the correlations of ADC values and SUVs with tumor size, tumor stage and histological grade. Two experienced readers measured the ADC and SUVs independently, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the inter-observer agreement. Results: The mean ADCmin, ADCmean, and ADCmin/mean for HNSSCs were 0.68±0.17×10−3 mm2/s, 0.82±0.17×10−3 mm2/s, and 0.83±0.10, respectively. The mean SUVmax and SUVlbm were 14.65±5.5 and 10.96±5.1, respectively. The correlations between ADC values and SUVs did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant correlations of ADC values and SUVs with tumor size, tumor stage or histological grade. There was a tendency of SUVs to increase and ADC values to decrease with tumor dedifferentiation; however, the changes were not significant. Inter-observer agreement for tumor ADC values and SUVs was almost perfect (ICC>0.81). Conclusions: Pretreatment ADC values and SUVs in HNSSCs are reproducible and independent biomarkers.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOLAK, E., BAYRAKTAROĞLU, S., AKAGÜNDÜZ, Ö., SAVAŞ, R., ESASSOLAK, M. (2020). Correlation of ADC values measured using 3T diffusion-weighted MRI and SUVs from fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2, 72–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/158098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Argiris A, Karamouzis MV, Raben D, Ferris D. Head and neck cancer. Lancet 2008;371:1695-1709
  2. Seitz O, Chambron-Pinho N, Middendorp M, et al. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen. Neuroradiology. 2009;51:677-686
  3. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, King AD. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology. 2012;263:19-32
  4. Al-Ibraheem A, Buck A, Krause BJ, Scheidhauer K, Schwaiger M. Clinical applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in head and neck cancer. J Oncol. 2009;2009:208725
  5. Liu S, Zheng H, Zhang Y, et al. Whole-volume apparent diffusion coefficient-based entropy parameters for assessment of gastric cancer aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:168-175
  6. Cui L, Yin JB, Hu CH, Gong SC, Xu JF, Yang JS. Inter- and intraobserver agreement of ADC measurements of lung cancer in free breathing, breath-hold and respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted MRI. Clin Imaging. 2016;40:892-896
  7. Liu L, Liu Y, Xu L, et al. Application of texture analysis based on apparent diffusion coefficient maps in discriminating different stages of rectal cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:1798-1808
  8. Schob S, Meyer HJ, Pazaitis N, et al. ADC Histogram Analysis of Cervical Cancer Aids Detecting Lymphatic Metastases-a Preliminary Study. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:953-962
  9. KruskalW, Wallis A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance Analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1952;47:583-621
  10. Donner A, Koval JJ. The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data. Biometrics. 1980;36:19-25
  11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174
  12. Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, DeBruhl N, Bassett LW. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:693-704
  13. Huisman TA, Loenneker T, Barta G, et al. Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:1651-1658
  14. Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:986-994
  15. Fushimi Y, Miki Y, Okada T, et al.