SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

HOW DOES STUDENTS’ LEARNING (ACHIEVEMENT) RELATE TO THEIR LEVEL OF WE-INTENTION AND THEIR LEARNING METHODS ON FACEBOOK?

Ali Akkaya
Tuğrul Cabir Hakyemez
Ekrem Kutbay
Birgül Kutlu Bayraktar
Pages
61–69
Publication Date
2016-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Social Network Site, Facebook,Education, Collaborative learning, Jigsaw model, computer network

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Over the past decade, collaborative learning environments on Social Network Sites (SNSs) has become more widespread than ever before across the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yet, there is still lack of well-established methodologies that approach the learning process from pedagogical, group and social network perspectives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Social Network Site, Facebook,Education, Collaborative learning, Jigsaw model, computer network
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Over the past decade, collaborative learning environments on Social Network Sites (SNSs) has become more widespread than ever before across the world. Yet, there is still lack of well-established methodologies that approach the learning process from pedagogical, group and social network perspectives. In this study, it is aimed to develop a framework and also a roadmap for evaluating the impact of a pedagogical model, namely Jigsaw model, on the participation behaviors and successive achievements of the students. Here, the students are grouped based on their We-Intention levels (high and low) and status of participation in the Jigsaw learning process in Facebook groups. As a result of the study, a theoretical model is proposed towards the use of Jigsaw model on Facebook groups. This model is assumed to help educators make use of social network sites efficiently. Keywords: Social Network Site, Facebook,Education, Collaborative learning, Jigsaw model, computer network

🔖

Cite This Article

Akkaya, A., Hakyemez, T. C., Kutbay, E., Bayraktar, B. K. (2016). HOW DOES STUDENTS’ LEARNING (ACHIEVEMENT) RELATE TO THEIR LEVEL OF WE-INTENTION AND THEIR LEARNING METHODS ON FACEBOOK?. Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 61–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/1578554

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage.
  2. Bicen, H., & Cavus, N. (2011). Social network sites usage habits of undergraduate students: Case study of Facebook. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 943-947.
  3. Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning,9(2), 151-170.
  4. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities.
  5. Carpenter, J. (2006). Effective Teaching Methods for Large Classes. Journal of Family&Consumer Sciences Education, 13-23.
  6. Bucci, T. T., Copenhaver, L. J., Lehman, B., & O’brien, T. (2003). Technology integration: Connections to educational theories. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 30-46.
  7. Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.
  8. De Vries, D. L., & Slavin, R. E. (1978). Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT): Review of Ten Classroom Experiments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 28-38.
  9. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263.
  10. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative- learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1-19.
  11. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
  12. Gaggioli, A., Milani, L., Mazzoni, E., & Riva, G. (2011). Networked Flow: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration in Educational and Training Settings. The Open Education Journal, 41-49.
  13. Griffith, S., & Liyanage, L. (2008, June). An introduction to the potential of social networking sites in education. In Emerging Technologies Conference 2008 (p. 9).
  14. Kansanen, P. (2003). Studying--the Realistic Bridge Between Instruction and Learning. An Attempt to a Conceptual Whole of the Teaching-Studying- Learning Process. Educational Studies, 221-232.
  15. Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. V. (2011). “Friending” professors, parents and bosses: a Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 214-222.
  16. Kılıç, D. (2008). The Effectof the Jigsaw Technique on Learning the Concepts of the Principles and Methods of Teaching. World Applied Sciences Journal, 109-114.
  17. Kolek, E. A., & Saunders, D. (2008). Online disclosure: An empirical examination of undergraduate Facebook profiles. NASPA journal, 45(1), 1-25.
  18. Kordaki, M., & Siempos, H. (2010, April). The Jigsaw Collaborative Method within the Online Computer Science Classroom. In CSEDU (2) (pp. 65-72)
  19. Lampe, C., Wohn, D. Y., Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B., & Wash, R. (2011). Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(3), 329-347.
  20. Liao, Y. W., Huang, Y. M., Chen, H. C., & Huang, S. H. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of collaborative learning performance over social networking sites in a ubiquitous learning context. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 313-323.
  21. Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(18), B26.
  22. Mazzoni, E., & Gaffuri, P. (2009). Monitoring Activity in E-Learning: A Quantitative Model Based on Web. J. Angel içinde, Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-Learning Support: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-Learning Support (s. 111-128). Hershey: IGI.
  23. Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.
  24. Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 30(3), 227-238.
  25. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and higher education, 13(3), 134-140.
  26. Sawyer, R. (2007). Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books Press.
  27. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157-174.
  28. Senemoğlu, N. (2007). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Gönül Yayıncılık.
  29. Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of educational research,50(2), 315-342
  30. Slavin, R. E. (1985). Team-assisted individualization. In Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 177-209). Springer US.
  31. Shen, A., Cheung, C., Lee, M., & Wang, W. (2007). We-Intention to Use Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Social Influence Model. PACIS 2007 Proceedings, (s. 105-121). Auckland.
  32. Shen, A., Lee, M., Cheung, C., & Chen, H. (2010). Gender Differences in Intentional Social Action: We-Intention to Engage in Social Network-Facilitated Team Collaboration. Journal of Information Technology, 152-169.
  33. Shiu, H., Fong, J., & Lam, J. (2010). Facebook–education with social networking websites for teaching and learning. In Hybrid learning (pp. 59-70). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  34. Slish, D. (2005). Assessment of the Use of the Jigsaw Method and Active Learning in Non-majors,Introductory Biology. Bioscene, 4-10.
  35. Tuomela, R. (1995). The importance of us: A philosophical study of basic social notions. Stanford, USA.
  36. Tuparov, G., & Tuparova, D. The “Jigsaw” Collaborative Method in Blended Learning Course “Computer Games and Education”–Realization in Moodle. InProc. of Int. Conf. Interactive Computer Based Learning ICL2009, Kassel University Press, ISBN (pp. 978-3).
  37. Violino, B. (2009). The buzz on campus: Social networking takes hold.Community College Journal, 79(6), 28.