Journals / Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 23

Maritime Supply Chain Security Gaps of Middle Powers

Pages
103–136
Publication Date
2016-04-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Third group of security gaps need the middle power vision regarding maritime supply chain security.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to find out the maritime supply chain security gaps that middle powers might encounter by comparing the maritime supply chain security of the dominant power, the US, and the middle power, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To accomplish this benchmarking, the Two Axes Multi-Sector (TAMS) model that enabled the multi-layered based security analysis throughout the two flows -cargo flow and transit flow- running in the logistics channel is introduced.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Third group of security gaps need the middle power vision regarding maritime supply chain security.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:SCS (Supply Chain Security) · security initiatives · TAMS (Two Axes Multi-Sector) model

Özet

This paper aims to find out the maritime supply chain security gaps that middle powers might encounter by comparing the maritime supply chain security of the dominant power, the US, and the middle power, Turkey. To accomplish this benchmarking, the Two Axes Multi-Sector (TAMS) model that enabled the multi-layered based security analysis throughout the two flows -cargo flow and transit flow- running in the logistics channel is introduced. As a result of the comparison with the TAMS model, the maritime supply chain security gaps of the middle powers can be divided into three distinct categories. First group of security gaps need the efforts of the international organizations to be overcome. Second group of security gaps need grants and funds from the dominant power or international organizations to be overcome. Third group of security gaps need the middle power vision regarding maritime supply chain security.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜREDİ, O., KİŞİ, H. (2016). Maritime Supply Chain Security Gaps of Middle Powers. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 23, 103–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/157776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. BICHOU Khalid, “Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking”, Mary R. Brooks and Kevin Cullinane, (ed.), Devolution, Port Governance and Port Performance, Research in Transportation Economics, Volume 17, JAI Press, the Netherlands, 2007. BICHOU Khalid and EVANS Andrew, “Maritime Security and Regulatory Risk-Based Models: Review and Critical Analysis”, Khalid Bichou, Michael G.H. Bell and Andrew Evans, (ed.), Risk Management in Port Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Security, Informa Law, New York, NY, 2007.
  2. COOK Thomas A., Managing Global Supply Chains: Compliance, Security, and Dealing with Terrorism, Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL., 2008. GREWAL Devinder, “International Ship Safety Regulations”, Wayne K. Talley, (ed.), Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Informa, London, 2008. HANSEN Hans T., “Distinction in the Finer Shades of Gray: The ‘Four Circles Model’ for Maritime Security Threat Assessment”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam. KUGLER Jacek and TAMMEN Ronald L., “Regional Challenge: China’s Rise to Power”, Jim Rolfe, (ed.), The Asia-Pacific: A Region in Transition, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, HI, 2004. LEMKE Douglas and KUGLER Jacek, “The Evolution of the Power Transition Perspective”, Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke, (ed.), Parity and War: Evolutions and Extensions of the War Ledger, University of Michigan Press,
  3. Ann Arbor, MI, 1996. MURPHY Martin N., “Lifeline or Pipedream? Origins, Purposes, and Benefits of Automatic Identification System, Long-Range Identification and Tracking, and Maritime Domain Awareness”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam Bateman, Peter Lehr, (ed.), Lloyd’s MIU Handbook of Maritime Security, CRC Press, London, 2008.
  4. ORGANSKI A.F. Kenneth, World Politics, Knopf, New York, NY, 1968. ORGANSKI A.F. Kenneth and KUGLER Jacek, The War Ledger, University of Chicago Press,
  5. Chicago, IL. 1980. PALLIS Athanasios A. and VAGGELAS George K., “EU Port and Shipping Security”, Wayne K. Talley, (ed.), Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Informa, London, 2008. PEGG Russell, “Maritime Forces and Security of Merchant Shipping in the Mediterranean Sea and Northern Indian Ocean”, Rupert Herbert-Burns, Sam Bateman, Peter Lehr, (ed.), Lloyd’s MIU Handbook of Maritime Security, CRC Press, London, 2008. PINTO C. Ariel, et. al., “US Port Security”, Wayne K. Talley, (ed.), Maritime Safety, Security and Piracy, Informa, London, 2008. RAHMAN Chris, “Evolving U.S. Framework for Global Mar