Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

The globalization of Third worldism?: changing appraisal of international

Üçüncü Dünyacılık küreselleşirken?: Uluslararası düzenlemenin değişen eleştirisi

Pages
21–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to demonstrate and evaluate critically the arguments provided by TWAIL from a political-economy approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The literature developing under the banner of the 'Third World Approaches to International Law' (TWAIL) analyzes international law in order to promote a fair and equitable approach to the countries of 'developing' world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The opposition to the prevailing system of international law is not a new phenomenon.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to demonstrate and evaluate critically the arguments provided by TWAIL from a political-economy approach.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The literature developing under the banner of the 'Third World Approaches to International Law' (TWAIL) analyzes international law in order to promote a fair and equitable approach to the countries of 'developing' world. The opposition to the prevailing system of international law is not a new phenomenon. The novelty of the TWAIL is to reformulate the classical Third World opposition to international law in the era of globalization. This article aims to demonstrate and evaluate critically the arguments provided by TWAIL from a political-economy approach.

Özet

Uluslararası Hukuka Üçüncü Dünya Yaklaşım(lar)ı (TWAIL) başlığı altında gelişen yazın uluslararası hukuku "gelişmekte olan" dünyanın ülkelerine adil ve hakkaniyetli bir yaklaşımı desteklemek maksadıyla çözümlemektedir. Mevcut uluslararası hukuka muhalefet yeni bir olgu değildir. TWAIL 'in yeniliği uluslararası hukuka klasik Üçüncü Dünya muhalefetini küreselleşme çağındçıyeniden formüle etme çabasında bulunabilir. Elinizdeki çalışma TWAIL tarafından geliştirilen savları ekonomi politik bir yaklaşıma dayanarak sergilemekte ve eleştirel olarak değerlendirmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A. M., UĞURLU, G., AYKUT, E. (2012). The globalization of Third worldism?: changing appraisal of international. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 21–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/157316

References (15)

  1. Agrawala, S. K. (1987), "The Emerging International Economic Order", Snyder, F.E. ve Sathirathai, S. (Der.), Third World Attiudes Toward International Law: An Introduction içinde, Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p. 379-390.
  2. Alexandrowicz, C.H. (1967), An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16th, 17th, 18th Centuries), Oxford, Clarendon P. Allott, P. (1999), "The Concept of International Law", European Journal of International Law, 10, p 31-50.
  3. Anghie, A. (2000), "What is TWAIL: Comment", Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (April 5-8, 2000
  4. Washington, DC.), p. 39-40.
  5. Anghie, A. (2005),
  6. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge University Press,
  7. Cambridge. Anghie, A. - Chimni, B.S. (2003), "Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflicts", Chinese Journal of International Law, 2(1), p. 77-103.
  8. Arato, A. (2006), "Empire's Democracy, Ours and Theirs", Bartholomew, A. (Der.), Empire's Law: The American Imperial Project and the 'War to Remake the World' içinde, Londra, Pluto Press, p. 217-245.
  9. Baxi, U. (1993),
  10. Marx, Law and Justice, Bombay, Indian Perspectives. Bedjaoui, M. (1979), Towards a New International Economic Order, New York, Holmes - Meier. Benton, T. - Craib, I. (2008),
  11. Sosyal Bilim Felsefesi, Sentez, Bursa. Berger, T (2004), "The End of the Third World? History, Destiny and the Fate of Third Worldism", Third World Quarterly, Vol. 25, No: 1, p. 9-39.
  12. Bhuta, N. (2006), "A New Bonapartism?" Bartholomew, A. (Der.), Empire's Law: The American Imperial Project and the 'War to Remake the World', Pluto Press, Londra p. 193-216.
  13. Callinicos, A. (2001), "Periodizing Capitalizm and Analyzing Imperialism: Classical Marxism and Capitalist Evolution ", Albritton R., Itoh, M., Westra, R., Zuege, A. (Der.), Phases of Capitalist Development: Booms, Crises and Globalisations içinde, Palgrave, New York, p. 230-245.
  14. Chakrabarty, D. (1996), "Modernity and Ethnicity in India", Bennet, D. (Der.), Multicultural States: Rethinking Difference and Identity içinde, Routledge, New York. Chakrabarty, D. (2002), Habitations in Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies, The University of Chicago Press,
  15. Chicago. Childs, P. - Williams, P. (1997), An Introduction to Post-Colonial Theory, Londra, Prentice Hall. Chimni, B.S. (1993), International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches, Sage Pu