Journals / Alatarım / 2004 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Utilization of molecular markers in Prunus species

Moleküler markörlerin prunus türlerinde kullanımı

Journal
Alatarım
Pages
15–22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Examples include following topics (1) marker assisted selection (2) genom mapping (3) comparative mapping (4) characterization of germplasm (5) phylogenetic analysis and cultivar identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The development of DNA technologies has provided great advantage to researchers working on plant breeding, genetics and evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Analyses shifted from phenotype to genotype, using isoenzymes, RFLPs, RAPDs and/or microsatellites (syn. simple sequence repeats, SSRs) as markers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Examples include following topics (1) marker assisted selection (2) genom mapping (3) comparative mapping (4) characterization of germplasm (5) phylogenetic analysis and cultivar identification.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Prunus · gen haritalaması · moleküler biyoloji

Abstract

The development of DNA technologies has provided great advantage to researchers working on plant breeding, genetics and evaluation. Analyses shifted from phenotype to genotype, using isoenzymes, RFLPs, RAPDs and/or microsatellites (syn. simple sequence repeats, SSRs) as markers. The objective of this review is to outline some important usage of molecular markers in Prunus. Examples include following topics (1) marker assisted selection (2) genom mapping (3) comparative mapping (4) characterization of germplasm (5) phylogenetic analysis and cultivar identification.

Özet

DNA teknolojilerinin geliştirilmesi bitki ıslahı, genetiği ve evrimi konularında çalışan araştırıcılara büyük avantajlar sağlamıştır. Analizler, izoenzim, RFLP, RAPD ve/veya mikrosatellit (SSR) markörlerini kullanarak fenotipten genotipe doğru kaymıştır. Bu yazıda moleküler markörlerin Prunus türlerinde kullanımınajdeğinilmiştir. Araştırmalar; (1) markörler yardımı ile seleksiyon (2) genom haritalaması (3) karşılaştırmalı haritalama (4) gen kaynaklarının karakterizasyonu (5) filogenetik analizler ve kültür çeşitlerinin tanımlanması konularından verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAÇAR, A. Y. (2004). Utilization of molecular markers in Prunus species. Alatarım, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/157305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abbott, A., Belthoff, L., Rajapakse, S., Ballard, R., Baird, V., Monet, R., Scorza, R., Morgens, P., Callahan, A., 1992. Development of Genetic Linkage Map of Peach. Proc. Plant Genome 1:22 (Abstr.l15). Abbott, A., Eldredge, L., Ballard, R., Baird, V., Callahan, A., Morgens, P., Scorza, R., 1991. Genetic Mapping-Implication for Variety Improvement and Identification. Proc. Southeast and Natl. Peach Conf., Savannah, Ga. p. 23-32.
  2. Abbott, A., Eldredge^ L., Ballard, R., Baird, V., Callahan, A., Morgens, P., Scorza, R., 1990. Molecular Genetic Mapping in Peaches. Proc. Southeast and Natl. Peach Conf, Hilton Head, S.C. p:38-43.
  3. Arumuganathan, K., Earle, E.D., 1991. Nuclear DNA Content of Some Important Plant Species. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9:208-218.
  4. Arus, P., Messeguer, R., Viruel, M., Tobutt, K., Dirlevanger, E., Santi, F., Quarta, R., Ritter, E., 1994a. The European Prunus mapping project. Euphytica 77:97-100.
  5. Arus, P., Olarte, C, Romero, M., Vargas, F., 1994b. Linkage Analysis of Tenisozyme Genes in F1 Segregating Almond Progenies. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:339-344.
  6. Baird, W.V., Estager, A.S., Wells, J., 1994. Estimating Nuclear DNA Content in Peach and Related Diploid Species Using Laser Flow Cytometry and DNA Hybridization. J. Amer. Soc. Hort Sci. 199: 1312-1316.
  7. Baird, W.V., Ballard, R.E., Rajapakse, S., Abbott, A.G., 1996. Progress in Prunus Mapping and Application of Molecular Markers to Gerplasm Improvement. Hort Sci. 31(7): 1099-1106.
  8. Bartolozzi, F., Walburton, M.L., Arulsekar, S., Gradziel, T.M., 1998. Genetic Characterization and Relatedness Among California Almond Cultivars and Breeding Lines Detected by Randomly Amplified Polymophic DNA (RAPD) Analysis. J.Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123(3):381-387.
  9. Beaver, J.A., Iezzoni, A.F., Ramm, C.W., 1995.
  10. Isozyme diversity in Sour, Sweet and Ground Cherry. Ther. Appl. Genet. 90:847-852.
  11. Beckmann, J.S., Soller, M., 1986. Restriction Fragment Length Polimorphism and Genetic Improvemet of Agricultural Species. Euphyt. 35:111-124.
  12. Bliss, F.A., Arulsekar, S., Dandekar, A.M., 1994. Identification of Woody Plant Cultivars Using DNA Fingerprinting p. 1-8 In: Research Reports, California Peaches and Nectarines. California Tree Fruit Agreement, Sacramento. Boonprakob, U., Byrne, D.H. 1995. Genetic Relationships of Diploid Plums Based on RAPD Polymorphisms. HortScience 30:736. (Abstr.92). Brettin, T.S., Iezzoni, A.F. 1995. Chloroplast DNA Polymorphisms in Sweet, Sour and Ground Cherry. Hort Sci. 30:855 (abs). Cantini, C,