Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 8

An LSTM-based aggregated model for air pollution forecasting

Pages
1451–1463
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results reveal that the proposed aggregated model can effectively improve the accuracy of prediction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the past few years, severe air-pollution problem has garnered worldwide attention due to its effect on health and wellbeing of individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:How to effectively and accurately predict air pollution becomes an important issue.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results reveal that the proposed aggregated model can effectively improve the accuracy of prediction.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

During the past few years, severe air-pollution problem has garnered worldwide attention due to its effect on health and wellbeing of individuals. As a result, the analysis and prediction of air pollution has attracted a good deal of interest among researchers. The research areas include traditional machine learning, neural networks and deep learning. How to effectively and accurately predict air pollution becomes an important issue. In this paper, we propose an Aggregated LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) model (ALSTM) based on the LSTM deep learning method. In this new model, we combine local air quality monitoring station, the station in nearby industrial areas, and the stations for external pollution sources. To improve prediction accuracy, we aggregate three LSTM models into a predictive model for early predictions based on external sources of pollution and information from nearby industrial air quality stations. We exploited the data with 17 attributes collected by Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency from 2012 to 2017 as the training data to build the ALSTM forecasting model, and we tested the model using the data collected in 2018. We conducted some experiments to compare our new ALSTM model with SVR (Support Vector Machine based Regression), GBTR (Gradient Boosted Tree Regression), LSTM, etc., in the prediction of PM2.5 for 1–8 h, and evaluated them using various assessment techniques, such as MAE, RMSE, and MAPE. The results reveal that the proposed aggregated model can effectively improve the accuracy of prediction.

🔖

Cite This Article

CHANG, Y., CHIAO, H., ABIMANNAN, S., HUANG, Y., TSAI, Y., LIN, K. (2020). An LSTM-based aggregated model for air pollution forecasting. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 8, 1451–1463. https://ajindex.com/articles/157235

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akima, H., 1970. A new method of interpolation and smooth curve fitting based on local procedures. J. ACM 17 (4), 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1145/321607.321609.
  2. Arwa, Sayegh, James, E. Tate, Ropkins, Karl, 2016. Understanding how roadside concentrations of NOx are influenced by the background levels, traffic density, and meteorological conditions using Boosted Regression Trees. Atmos. Environ. 127, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.024.
  3. Athira, V., Geetha, P., Vinayakumar, R., Soman, K.P., 2018. DeepAirNet: applying recurrent networks for air quality prediction. Procedia Comput.Sci. 132, 1394–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.068.
  4. Barai, S.V., Dikshit, A.K., Sharma, S., 2007. Neural network models for air quality prediction: a comparative study. Soft Computing in industrial applications. ANISC 39, 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70706-6_27.
  5. Baralis, E., Cerquitelli, T., Chiusano, S., Garza, P., Reza Kavoosifar, M., 2016. Analyzing air pollution on the urban environment. In: 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia. IEEE, pp. 1464–1469. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO. 2016.7522370. Breiman, L., 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24 (2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10. 1023/A:1018054314350. David, C.Carslaw, Paul, J.Taylor, 2009. Analysis of air pollution data at a mixed source location using boosted regression trees. Atmos. Environ. 43 (22–23), 3563–3570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.001.
  6. Chen, Z., Wang, J., Ma, G., Zhang, Y., 2013. China tackles the health effects of air pollution. Lancet 382 (9909), 1959–1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13) 62064-4.
  7. Cho, K., Lee, B., Kwon, M., Kim, S., 2019. Air quality prediction using a deep neural network model. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 35 (2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2019.35.2.214.
  8. Corani, G., 2005. Air quality prediction in Milan: feed-forward neural networks, pruned neural networks and lazy learning. Ecol. Model. 185 (2–4), 513–529. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.008. Delavar, M., Gholami, A., Shiran, G., Rashidi, Y., Nakhaeizadeh, G., Fedra, K., Hatefi Afshar, S., 2019. A novel method for improving air pollution prediction based on machine learning approaches: a case study applied to the capital city of tehran. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8 (2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8020099.
  9. Deng, F., Ma, L., Gao,