Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Low tube voltage increases the diagnostic performance of dualenergy computed tomography in patients with acute appendicitis

Pages
257–264
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This finding suggests that low kVp CT may be useful for diagnosing AA with reduced patient radiation exposure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to assess the utility of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) imaging in diagnosing acute appendicitis (AA) with density measurements of the appendix vermiformis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS A total of 210 consecutive patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were scanned using DECT between January and October 2016.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This finding suggests that low kVp CT may be useful for diagnosing AA with reduced patient radiation exposure.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to assess the utility of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) imaging in diagnosing acute appendicitis (AA) with density measurements of the appendix vermiformis. METHODS A total of 210 consecutive patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were scanned using DECT between January and October 2016. Twenty-six patients had pathologically confirmed AA, while 30 had normal appendices. Appendiceal densities were measured in the true axial section of the appendix vermiformis at 80 kVp, 140 kVp, virtual noncontrast, iodine overlay, mixed, and monoenergetic (40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100 keV) images. RESULTS Comparison of the appendix at different kVp and keV energy levels, virtual noncontrast, iodine overlay, and mixed images yielded significant differences between patients with appendicitis and those with a normal appendix (P < 0.001 for all). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the 80 kVp image set yielded the best diagnostic performance among all image sets (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.996; P < 0.001), while 70 keV images yielded the highest diagnostic performance among the virtual monoenergetic image sets (AUC, 0.958; P < 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was good at 80 kVp images (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.78, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Evaluation of DECT image reconstructions suggested that low tube voltage with 80 kVp demonstrated accurate diagnostic performance for AA. This finding suggests that low kVp CT may be useful for diagnosing AA with reduced patient radiation exposure.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPEL, Ç., ONUR, M. R., AKPINAR, E., KARAOSMANOĞLU, A., AKATA, D., KARÇAALTINCABA, M. (2019). Low tube voltage increases the diagnostic performance of dualenergy computed tomography in patients with acute appendicitis. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 257–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/156981

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: Nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 2002
  2. 799– 804. [CrossRef] 2. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004
  3. 537–546. [CrossRef] 3. Malone AJ, Jr., Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993
  4. 763–766. [CrossRef] 4. Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB, Jr. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997
  5. 405–409. [CrossRef] 5. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997
  6. 1275–1280. [CrossRef] 6. Choi D, Park H, Lee YR, et al. The most useful findings for diagnosing acute appendicitis on contrast-enhanced helical CT. Acta Radiol 2003
  7. 574–582. [CrossRef] 7. Fletcher JG, Takahashi N, Hartman R, et al. Dual-energy and dual-source CT: is there a role in the abdomen and pelvis? Radiol Clin North Am 2009
  8. 41–57. [CrossRef] 8. Karçaaltincaba M, Aktas A. Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Yu L, Leng S, McCollough CH. Dual-energy CTbased monochromatic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012
  10. 199(Suppl 5):S9–S15. [CrossRef] 10. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994
  11. 31–35. [CrossRef] 11. Balthazar E, Megibow A, Siegel S, Birnbaum B. Appendicitis: prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT. Radiology 1991
  12. 21–24. [CrossRef] 12. Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J, Jr, Huang S, Moh P. Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT Sections in the Same Patient. Radiology 2000
  13. 172–177. [CrossRef] 13. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ. Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997
  14. 1275–1280. [CrossRef] 14. Birnbaum BA, Balthazar EJ. CT of appendicitis and diverticulitis. Radiol Clin North Am 1994
  15. Birnbaum BA, Jeffrey Jr RB. CT and sonographic evalua