SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Eğitim Spektrumu Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

A Suggested Course Syllabus for Teaching English in Early Childhood

Erken Çocuklukta İngilizce Öğretimi İçin Bir Ders İçerik Önerisi

Özge Can Ceylan(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0009-0005-5151-5543
Kürşat Cesur(Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University)0000-0001-5091-9793
Pages
187–207
Publication Date
2025-09-10
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, the course syllabus was designed and offered based on the EFL teachers’ needs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Teaching English in Early Childhood (TEEC) requires a variety of materials, in-class activities, skills and experience to prepare and utilize in the classroom.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results obtained from the survey were analyzed employing SPSS Statistics Version 27.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, the course syllabus was designed and offered based on the EFL teachers’ needs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Erken çocuklu eğitimi · ders içeriği · öğretmen eğitimi

Abstract

Teaching English in Early Childhood (TEEC) requires a variety of materials, in-class activities, skills and experience to prepare and utilize in the classroom. To design appropriate materials, in-class activities, and apply them collaboratively in the classroom, EFL teachers are required to receive necessary training in their teacher education programmes. This study aims to develop a course syllabus for pre- and in-service EFL teachers for TEEC settings. First, with the purpose of identifying the frequent topics in the content of (Teaching English to Young Learners) TEYLs and TEEC courses of state universities in Türkiye, books, published articles, and observations of online courses providing the relevant content, a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design was applied to reach the targeted data. The document analysis was employed via MS Excel. Secondly, using the qualitative data collected, a survey was prepared to gather opinions of EFL teachers having experience regarding teaching English in early childhood. The results obtained from the survey were analyzed employing SPSS Statistics Version 27. The data exhibit EFL teachers need more up-to-date topics, and opportunities to apply theory in real classroom. At the end of the study, the course syllabus was designed and offered based on the EFL teachers’ needs.

Özet

Erken Çocuklukta Dil Öğretimi sınıfta hazırlamak ve kullanmak için çeşitli materyalleri, sınıf içi etkinlikleri, becerileri ve deneyimleri gerektirir. Uygun materyaller ve sınıf içi etkinlikler tasarlamak ve bunları sınıfta iş birliği içinde uygulamak için, İngilizce öğretmenlerinin öğretmen eğitimi programlarında gerekli eğitimi almaları gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, Erken Çocuklukta Dil Öğretimi hizmet öncesi ve hizmet içi İngilizce öğretmenleri için bir ders müfredatı geliştirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. İlk olarak, sıkça geçen konuları belirlemek amacıyla Türkiye'deki devlet üniversitelerinin Çocuklara Yabancı Dil Öğretimi ve Erken Çocuklukta Dil Öğretimi derslerinin içeriği, ilgili içeriği sağlayan kitaplar, yayınlanmış makaleler ve çevrimiçi derslerin gözlemleri incelenmiş ve hedeflenen verilere ulaşmak için sıralı keşifsel karma yöntem tasarımı uygulanmıştır. Belge analizi MS Excel aracılığıyla yapılmıştır. İkinci olarak, toplanan nitel veriler kullanılarak, erken çocukluk döneminde İngilizce öğretimi konusunda deneyimli İngilizce öğretmenlerinin görüşlerini toplamak için bir anket hazırlanmıştır. Anketten elde edilen sonuçlar SPSS Statistics Version 27 kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Veriler, İngilizce öğretmenlerinin daha güncel konulara ve teoriyi gerçek sınıf ortamında uygulama fırsatlarına ihtiyaç duyduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışmanın sonunda, ders müfredatı, İngilizce öğretmenlerinin ihtiyaçlarına göre tasarlanmış ve sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ceylan, Ö. C., Cesur, K. (2025). A Suggested Course Syllabus for Teaching English in Early Childhood. Uluslararası Eğitim Spektrumu Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1752188

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (72)

  1. Ataberk, B., & Mirici, İ. H. (2022). An investigation of the 21st century skills in English language teaching (ELT) programs in Turkey. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 9(4), 1513–1544.
  2. Atak Damar, E., Gürsoy, E., & Çelik Korkmaz, Ş. (2013). Teaching English to young learners: Through the eyes of EFL teacher trainers. ELT Research Journal, 2(3), 95–110.
  3. Ataş, U., & Balıkçı, G. (2021). Linking theory and practice in an ELT program: An evaluation of materials, testing and practicum courses. Journal of Narrative and Language Studies, 9(17), 211–226.
  4. Bayyurt, Y., Kurt, Y., Öztekin, E., Guerra, L., Cavalheiro, L., & Pereira, R. (2019). English language teachers’ awareness of English as a lingua franca in multilingual and multicultural contexts. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.599230
  5. Bland, J. (2019). Teaching English to young learners: More teacher education and more children’s literature! Children’s Literature in English Language Education, 7(2), 79–103.
  6. Breen, M. P. (2001). Syllabus design. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 151–159). Cambridge University Press.
  7. Brown, H. D. (2002). English language teaching in the ‘Post-Method’ era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 9–18). Cambridge University Press.
  8. Butler, Y. G. (2019). Assessment of young English learners in instructional settings. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 477–496). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_24
  9. Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Cesur, K. (2012). Examining competencies of prospective English teachers through their pedagogical content knowledge: A case study (PhD thesis, Gazi University). Ankara.
  11. Cesur, K., & Bulanık, F. (2020). EFL teachers’ most preferred topics for the syllabus of the course “Teaching English to young learners”. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 2(1), 25–37.
  12. Clarke, P. (2009). Supporting children learning English as a second language in the early years (birth to six years). VCAA.
  13. Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference: Companion volume with new descriptors. https://rm.coe.int/cefrcompanion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage.
  15. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluation quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  16. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
  17. Dinçay, T. (2010). Designing a learner-centered ESP course for adults based on evidence from a questionnaire and incorporating the learner’s aims into a situational-based syllabus. Dil Dergisi, 150, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1501/dilder_0000000135
  18. Djigunovic, J. M., & Krevelj, S. L. (2022). From preprimary to primary learning of English as a foreign language: Coherence and continuity issues. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of early language education (pp. 613–639). Springer.
  19. Doan, T. V., & Quyen, B. T. T. (2022). Difficulties encountered by teachers in using storytelling to teach very young learners. HCMCOUJS-Social Sciences, 13(1), 106–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.13.1.2287.2023
  20. Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586953
  21. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  22. Gimbert, B. G., Miller, D., Herman, E., Breedlove, M., & Molina, C. E. (2021). Social emotional learning in schools: The importance of educator competence. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 18(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/19427751211014920
  23. Gül, Y. E. (2023). A theoretical perspective on survey method from quantitative research methods. Universum, 4(106), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.32743/UniPsy.2023.106.4.15254
  24. Hoff, E., & Shatz, M. (2007). Blackwell handbook of language development. Blackwell Publishing.
  25. Imaniah, I., & Tan, N. (2017). Teaching English for young learners. FKIP UMT PRESS.
  26. Intarapanich, C. (2013). Teaching methods, approaches and strategies found in EFL classrooms: A case study in Lao PDR. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.510
  27. Jingga, J. (2022). Teaching English language in early childhood. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v2i2.78
  28. Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford Peganon.
  29. Lewis, M. (1997). Implementing the lexical approach: Putting theory into practice. Language Teaching Publications.
  30. Liao, X. Q. (2020). How communicative language teaching became acceptable in secondary schools in China [Conference presentation full paper]. The Asian Conference on Education ACE 2020: Surviving & Thriving: Education in Times of Change. Tokyo, Japan. https://www.aijcr.org/_files/ugd/c51627_bd738f10144146449ab4e8c0a2e2f803.pdf
  31. Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles for language teaching. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 373–394). Wiley-Blackwell.
  32. Mahdi, R. N., Ehsan, A., & Javad, Z. (2013). A critical review of recent trends in second language syllabus design and curriculum development. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.152
  33. Mahn, H. (1999). Vygotsky’s methodological contribution to sociocultural theory. Remedial and Special Education, 20(6), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000607
  34. Meyer, D. Z., & Avery, L. M. (2009). Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods, 21(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X08323985
  35. Ministry of National Education. (2012). Çocuklar için İngilizce erken dil öğretimi kurs programı. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  36. Mohan, B. A. (1986). Language and content. Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  37. Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge University Press.
  38. Murphy, R. S. (2018). The concept of syllabus design and curriculum development. In Faravani et al. (Eds.), Issues in syllabus design (Vol. 6, pp. 1–23). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789463511889_001
  39. Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford University Press.
  40. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
  41. O’Grady, W. (2005). How children learn language. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2004). Enhancing the interpretation of significant findings: The role of mixed methods research. The Qualitative Report, 9(4), 770–792.
  43. Ozdem-Yılmaz, Y., & Bilican, K. (2020). Discovery learning—Jerome Bruner. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory (pp. 177–190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9
  44. Önal, A. (2025). A modernization proposal for English language teacher training programs in Türkiye. Психолого-педагогічні науки, 1, 236–242. https://doi.org/10.31654/2663-4902-2025-РР-1-236-242
  45. Önalan, O., & Gürsoy, E. (2020). EFL teachers’ views and needs on in-service training as a part of professional development: A case study in Turkish context. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.713100
  46. Öztürk, G., & Aydın, B. (2019). English language teacher education in Turkey: Why do we fail and what policy reforms are needed? Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9(1), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.520842
  47. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  48. Pinter, A. (2011). Children learning second languages. Palgrave Macmillan.
  49. Prošić-Santovac, D., & Savić, V. (2022). English as a foreign language in early language education. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of early language education (pp. 449–473). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47073-9_13-1
  50. Rabbini, R. (2020). An introduction to syllabus design and evaluation [Conference presentation full paper]. The Asian Conference on Education ACE 2020: Surviving & Thriving: Education in Times of Change. Tokyo, Japan. https://www.aijcr.org/_files/ugd/c51627_bd738f10144146449ab4e8c0a2e2f803.pdf
  51. Reilly, T. (1988). Approaches to foreign language syllabus design. ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics Washington DC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED295460
  52. Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  53. Robinson, P. (1998). State of the art: SLA theory and second language syllabus design. The Language Teacher, 22(4), 7–14.
  54. Schwartz, M. (2022). Language-conducive strategies in early language education. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of early language education (pp. 641–668). Springer.
  55. Scott, W. A., & Ytreberg, L. H. (1990). Teaching English to children (N. Grant, Ed.). Longman.
  56. Sığırtmaç, A., & Özbek, S. (2009). Teaching English in early childhood. İnönü University Journal of The Faculty of Education, 10(1), 107–122.
  57. Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201–217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3587333
  58. Şahin, İ. (2023). Teaching practicum in English language teaching (ELT): A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Spectrum, 5(2), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.1328463
  59. Şanal, F. (2016). Syllabus design. Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, 2(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.20322/lt.57312
  60. Takaya, K. (2013). Jerome Bruner: Developing a sense of the possible. Springer.
  61. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. B. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage Publications.
  62. Uysal, N. D., & Yavuz, F. (2015). Teaching English to very young learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.042
  63. Veliou, E., Argiri, M., & Kontogeorgou, E. T. (2022). Teaching English to very young learners through art. Culture - Journal of Culture in Tourism, Art and Education, 2(3), 82–92.
  64. Villar, M. B., Maldonado, E. Y. C., Zamarron, R. C., & Chavez, A. J. G. (2019). The challenge of teaching children. Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas.
  65. Vygotsky, L. S., Hanfmann, E., Vakar, G. C., & Kozulin, A. (2012). Thought and language: Revised and expanded edition. The M.I.T. Press.
  66. White, R. E., & Cooper, K. (2022). Qualitative research in the post-modern era: Critical approaches and selected methodologies. Springer.
  67. Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Educational and pedagogic factors in syllabus design. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 22–28). Pergamon.
  68. Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford University Press.
  69. Yalden, J. (1984). Syllabus design in general education. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 13–21). Pergamon.
  70. Yanç, S. (2002). A suggested advanced reading course syllabus for the first year (first term) students in ELT departments (Master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara, Türkiye.
  71. Yaşar Ekici, F., & Cengiz, S. (2021). Erken çocuklukta okula uyum ve erken okuryazarlık eğitimi. In F. Yaşar Ekici & K. Kırkıç (Eds.), Erken çocukluk eğitimi: Kuramdan uygulamaya (pp. 121–150). Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri.
  72. Zhou, S., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. (2021). Measuring L2 engagement: A review of issues and applications. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 75–98). Multilingual Matters.