SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / 2017 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Smear Layer Removal Efficacy Of Different Irrigation Techniques

Farklı Yıkama Tekniklerinin Smear Tabakasını Uzaklaştırma Etkinlikleri

BURCU ŞEREFOĞLU KARABEY
Majd SALAMEH
BEYSER PİŞKİN
Pages
32–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSİON: EndoVac system showed no betterment over conventional irrigation procedures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTİVES: To compare the cleaning efficacy of 3 root canal irrigation techniques as well as their effectiveness in removing smear layer from root canal walls.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: Thirty permanent mandibular premolars were divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSİON: EndoVac system showed no betterment over conventional irrigation procedures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTİVES: To compare the cleaning efficacy of 3 root canal irrigation techniques as well as their effectiveness in removing smear layer from root canal walls. METHODS: Thirty permanent mandibular premolars were divided into 3 groups of 10 teeth each. Teeth were instrumented with ProTaper rotary system up to F4. In group I, the teeth were irrigated by conventional irrigation using 27-gauge irrigation-needle. In group II, irrigation was done using 31-gauge NaviTip Double Sideported-needle. In group III, irrigation was performed with EndoVac irrigation system. Final irrigation was performed using 3 ml 2.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by 3 ml 5% EDTA and a final rinse with 3 ml distilled water. Scanning electron microscope evaluation was done for assessment of smear layer removal in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for significance at P <= .05. RESULTS: The removal of smear layer from the coronal third of root canals was significantly better than apical and middle thirds (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed between the procedures according to smear layer removal ability. CONCLUSİON: EndoVac system showed no betterment over conventional irrigation procedures.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı yıkama tekniklerinin kök kanallarından smear tabakasını uzaklaştırma etkinliklerini karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntem: Madde kaybı bulunmayan periodontal nedenlerle çekilmiş 30 adet tek kök ve tek kanallı insan alt küçük azı dişi her grupta 10 adet diş olacak şekilde 3 deney grubuna ayrıldı. Tüm deney gruplarında kök kanallarının genişletme ve şekillendirme işlemi ProTaper® F4 numaralı alete dek gerçekleştirildi. 1. grupta 27 gauge kalınlığında dental iğne ucu korono-apikal yönde hareket ettirilerek, 2. grupta 31 gauge kalınlığında Ultradent NaviTip® Double Sideport yıkama ucu ve 3. grupta ise EndoVac yıkama cihazı hem kök kanal şekillendirilmesi sırasında hem de son yıkama sırasında kullanıldı. Son yıkamada smear tabakasının uzaklaştırılması amacıyla sırasıyla 3 ml %5 EDTA, 3 ml %2,5 NaOCl ve son olarak 3 ml distile su kullanıldı. Yıkama sistemlerinin smear tabakasını uzaklaştırma etkinlikleri taramalı elektron mikroskobu ile değerlendirdi. Verilerin istatistiksel analizinde %95 güven aralığında Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testleri kullanıldı. Bulgular: Tüm deney gruplarında smear tabakasının koronal 1/3'lük kısımda apikal 1/3'lük bölgeye kıyasla daha iyi uzaklaştırıldığı gözlendi. Ancak, sistemlerin tüm bölgelerde smear tabakasını uzaklaştırma etkinlikleri arasında istatistiksel farklılık saptanmadı. Sonuç: Smear tabakasının uzaklaştırılmasında EndoVac sistemi konvansiyonel yıkama teknikleri ile benzer etkinlik göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABEY, B. Ş., SALAMEH, M., PİŞKİN, B. (2017). Smear Layer Removal Efficacy Of Different Irrigation Techniques. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 32–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/156681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am. 1974; 18: 269-296
  2. Bayırlı G. Endodontik Tedavi 1. İstanbul: İ.Ü Basımevi ve Film Merkezi;1998
  3. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummers PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and mean. Endod Topics 2005; 10: 30-76
  4. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation in oval canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 137-141
  5. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004; 30: 559-567
  6. Armitage GC, Ryder MI, Wilcox SE. Cemental changes in teeth with heavily infected root canals. J Endod 1983; 9: 127-130
  7. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, van Winkelhoff AJ. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2001; 27: 76-81
  8. Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 384-393
  9. Ando N, Hoshino E. Predominant obligate anaerobes invading the deep layers of root canal dentine. Int Endod J 1990; 23: 20-27
  10. Kuah HG, Lui JN, Tseng PS. The effect of EDTA with and without ultrasonics on removal of the smear layer, J Endod 2009; 35: 393-396
  11. Hulsmann M, Heckendorff M, Schafers F. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comperative SEM investigation, J Endod 1997; 23: 301-306
  12. Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function, Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992; 1: 215- 224
  13. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens, J Endod 19871; 3: 147-157
  14. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: Part 3, J Endod 1983; 9: 137-142
  15. Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer on root canal walls, J Endod 1984; 10: 477-483
  16. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 810-830
  17. Sen BH, Ertürk O, Pıskın B. The effect of different concentrations of EDTA on instrumented root canal walls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: 622-627
  18. Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an