Journals / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of childhood Sluggish Cognitive Tempo among patients with substance use disorder, substance-induced psychosis and childhood ADHD

Pages
142–151
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, there was a relationship between blunted affect, conceptual disorganization, and SCT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Substance use disorders (SUDs) include a pathological pattern of behaviors related with the effects of the drug used and are associated with substance-induced psychosis (SIP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: The rate of childhood SCT comorbidity was 63.8%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, there was a relationship between blunted affect, conceptual disorganization, and SCT.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Substance use disorders (SUDs) include a pathological pattern of behaviors related with the effects of the drug used and are associated with substance-induced psychosis (SIP). Individuals with lower levels of self-control are particularly predisposed to develop SUDs and SIP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether childhood sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT), which is a problem distinct from but related with ADHD, is associated with SUDs and SIP. Method: Fifty-seven SUD patients who had childhood ADHD symptoms and at least one SIP attack were enrolled the study. Patients were evaluated by Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Wender-Utah Rating Scale (WURS), and SCT Scale. Results: The rate of childhood SCT comorbidity was 63.8%. The total BPRS and conceptual disorganization, motor retardation, unusual thought content, blunted affect, excitement, and disorientation scores were higher in the childhood SCT group. SCT and WURS scores were positively correlated with BPRS scores but WURS scores were correlated with more psychotic symptoms and the correlations were stronger in WURS than SCT except “conceptual disorganization,” “motor retardation.” and “blunted affect.” Using linear regression analysis, we found that both childhood SCT and WURS scores significantly predicted the BPRS total, motor retardation, unusual thought content, blunted affect and excitement scores. Finally, the results of multivariate stepwise regression analyses indicated that tension and guilt significantly predicted WURS while blunted affect and conceptual disorganization predicted SCT scores. Conclusion: Approximately, 7 in 10 patients in this group seem to have had childhood SCT. SCT patients showed more proneness to psychotic symptoms when compared with others. In addition, there was a relationship between blunted affect, conceptual disorganization, and SCT.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜL, A., GÜL, H. (2019). Evaluation of childhood Sluggish Cognitive Tempo among patients with substance use disorder, substance-induced psychosis and childhood ADHD. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 142–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/156652

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth ed. (DSM-5). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publ., 2013. O’Brien CP, Charney DS, Lewis L, Cornish JW, Post RM, Woody GE, Zubieta JK, Anthony JC, Blaine JD, Bowden CL, Calabrese JR, Carroll K, Kosten T, Rounsaville B, Childress AR, Oslin DW, Pettinati HM, Davis MA, Demartino R, Drake RE, Fleming MF, Fricks L, Glassman AH, Levin FR, Nunes EV, Johnson RL, Jordan C, Kessler RC, Laden SK, Regier DA, Renner JA Jr, Ries RK, Sklar-Blake T, Weisner C. Priority actions to improve the care of persons with co-occurring substance abuse and other mental disorders: a call to action. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56:703- 713. Swendsen JD, Merikangas KR. The comorbidity of depression and substance use disorders. Clin Psychol Rev 2000; 20:173-189.
  2. Degenhardt L, Hall W. Extent of illicit drug use and dependence, and their contribution to the global burden of disease. Lancet 2012; 379:55-70. Yuodelis‐Flores C, Ries RK. Addiction and suicide: a review. Am J Addict 2015; 24:98-104.
  3. Polanczyk G, De Lima MS, Horta BL, Biederman J, Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 942-948.
  4. Kessler RC, Adler L, Barkley R, Biederman J, Conners CK, Demler O, Faraone SV, Greenhill LL, Howes MJ, Secnik K, Spencer T, Ustun TB, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:716-723. Willcutt EG. The prevalence of DSM-IV attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Neurotherapeutics 2012; 9:490-499.
  5. Bidwell LC, Willcutt EG, McQueen MB, DeFries JC, Olson RK, Smith SD, Pennington BF. A family based association study of DRD4, DAT1, and 5HTT and continuous traits of attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder. Behav Genetics 2011; 41:165-174. van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K, van de Glind G, van den Brink W, Smit F, Crunelle CL, Swets M, Schoevers RA. Prevalence of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in substance use disorder patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 122:11-19.
  6. Van de Glind G, Konstenius M, Koeter MW, van Emmerik-van Oortmerssen K, Carpentier P-J, Kaye S, Degenhardt L, Skutle A, Franck J, Bu ET, Moggi F, Dom G, Verspreet S, Demetrovics Z, Kapitany-Foveny M, Fatseas M, Auriacombe M, Schillinger A, Moller M, Johnson B, Faraone SV, Ram