According to the findings of the study, the South and East Asia subsystemexhibits a view where the “balance of power” is emphasized more than other regions,and where China emerges as the dominant economic and political power.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the “regional sub-system” analysis that aims to emphasize regional dynamicsin the field of International Relations with a theoretical and applied approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It hasbeen aimed to prove that the South and East Asia region, which was subject to the examinationwithin the scopes of the fundamental hypotheses of regional sub-system analysis, have aunique structure that differs from the global system, while having important contact pointswith the global system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings of the study, the South and East Asia subsystemexhibits a view where the “balance of power” is emphasized more than other regions,and where China emerges as the dominant economic and political power.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:South And East Asia · China · Sub-Systems
Özet
This study examines the “regional sub-system” analysis that aims to emphasize regional dynamicsin the field of International Relations with a theoretical and applied approach. It hasbeen aimed to prove that the South and East Asia region, which was subject to the examinationwithin the scopes of the fundamental hypotheses of regional sub-system analysis, have aunique structure that differs from the global system, while having important contact pointswith the global system. According to the findings of the study, the South and East Asia subsystemexhibits a view where the “balance of power” is emphasized more than other regions,and where China emerges as the dominant economic and political power.
KARACA, R. K., YÜCE, M. (2017). The Analysis of the Regional Sub-Systems” in International Relations: South and East Asia as a Regional Sub-System. Gazi Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 21, 157–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/156266
AGCAN Muhammed A., “Sosyal Bilimler Felsefesi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisi”, Küresel Siyasete Giriş, Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kavramlar, Teoriler, Süreçler, (Ed.) Evren Balta, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul 2014, s.77-111. ATEŞ Davut, “Uluslararası Sistem”, Uluslararası İlişkilere Giriş, Tarih, Teori, Kavram ve Konular, (Ed.) Şaban Kardaş, Ali Balcı, Küre Yayınları, 4. Basım, İstanbul 2015, s.431-443. BEŞGÜL Özge Onursal, “Yerelleşme, Bölgeselleşme ve Bütünleşme”, Küresel Siyasete Giriş, Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kavramlar, Teoriler, Süreçler, (Ed.) Evren Balta, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul 2014, s.525-545. BINDER Leonard, “The Middle East as a Subordinate International System”, World Politics, X/3, Nisan 1958, pp.408-429.
BLACK Jeremy, Great Powers and the Quest for Hegemony, Routledge, USA, Canada 2008. BRECHER Michael, “Internatioal Relations and Asian Studies: The Subordinate State System of Southern Asia”, World Politics, XV/2, 1963, pp.213-235. BRECHER Michael, “The Middle East Subordinate System and Its Impact on Israel’s Foreign Policy, International Studies Quarterly, XIII/2, Haziran 1969, pp.117-139.
BURCHILL Scott, LINKLATER Andrew, DEVETAK Richard vd., Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, Küre Yayınları, İstanbul 2012.
DAVUTOĞLU Ahmet, Stratejik Derinlik, Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu, Küre Yayınları, 79. Baskı, İstanbul 2012. ERGENÇ Ceren, “Çin’in Yükselişi”, Uluslararası İlişkilere Giriş, Ed. Şaban Kardaş ve Ali Balcı, Küre Yayınları, 4. Baskı, İstanbul 2015, s.655-669.