SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkiye Uzaktan Algılama Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Investigation of the performance of various machine learning algorithms and vegetation indices in the detection of strawberry fields

Ceren Akgül(YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-4196-4751
Osman Salih Yılmaz(CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4632-9349
Füsun Balık Şanlı(YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1243-8299
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The classification results were validated using high-resolution Google Earth Pro images, and for accuracy analysis, overall accuracy (OA), producer's accuracy (PA), user's accuracy (UA), kappa (κ) statistics, and F1-Score were calculated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to determine the optimal remote sensing method for identifying cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fields in the Köprübaşı district of Manisa province, a region characterized by intensive commercial strawberry production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, Sentinel-2 satellite images were used to classify the land cover of the region into six categories: forest, bare land, strawberry fields, water surfaces, other agricultural areas, and urban areas.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The classification results were validated using high-resolution Google Earth Pro images, and for accuracy analysis, overall accuracy (OA), producer's accuracy (PA), user's accuracy (UA), kappa (κ) statistics, and F1-Score were calculated.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Google earth engine · Machine learning algorithms · Strawberry

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimal remote sensing method for identifying cultivated strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fields in the Köprübaşı district of Manisa province, a region characterized by intensive commercial strawberry production. On the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform, Sentinel-2 satellite images were used to classify the land cover of the region into six categories: forest, bare land, strawberry fields, water surfaces, other agricultural areas, and urban areas. For the classification process, various machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Classification and Regression Trees (CART) and Naïve Bayes (NB) were utilized. In addition to traditional spectral bands, vegetation indices such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Red Edge Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (ReNDVI), and Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) were also incorporated into the classification process. The classification results were validated using high-resolution Google Earth Pro images, and for accuracy analysis, overall accuracy (OA), producer's accuracy (PA), user's accuracy (UA), kappa (κ) statistics, and F1-Score were calculated. According to the results, the SVM algorithm was identified as the most successful method, achieving an OA of 81.76% and a κ value of 0.78 with the RGB+NIR+NDVI band combination. In the detection of strawberry croplands, it achieved the best performance with 86.95% producer's accuracy (PA), 92.04% user's accuracy (UA), and an F1-Score of 89.42%. This study demonstrates that remote sensing and machine learning techniques can be effectively used for mapping strawberry fields.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akgül, C., Yılmaz, O. S., Şanlı, F. B. (2025). Investigation of the performance of various machine learning algorithms and vegetation indices in the detection of strawberry fields. Türkiye Uzaktan Algılama Dergisi, Volume: 7 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.51489/tuzal.1722736

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (100)

  1. Akkartal, A., Türüdü, O., & Erbek, F. S. (2005). Analysis of changes in vegetation biomass using multitemporal and multisensor satellite data. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 10. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, Ankara, Türkiye.
  2. Amani, M., Brisco, B., Afshar, M., Mirmazloumi, S. M., Mahdavi, S., Mirzadeh, S. M. J., Huang, W., & Granger, J. (2019). A generalized supervised classification scheme to produce provincial wetland inventory maps: an application of google earth engine for big geo data processing. Big Earth Data, 3(4), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1690404
  3. Bagher, S., Nasrabadi, F., Ahmadi, · Mohamadmahdi, & Dadjoo, M. (2025). Optimum data scale for remote sensing vegetation cover mapping using the multi-criteria decision analysis method. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2025, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12524-025-02223-X
  4. Bannari, A., Morin, D., Bonn, F., & Huete, A. (1995). A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sensing Reviews, 13(1–2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757259509532298
  5. Belgiu, M., & Drăguţ, L. (2016). Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, 24–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011
  6. Berger, K., Machwitz, M., Kycko, M., Kefauver, S. C., Wittenberghe, S. Van, Gerhards, M., Verrelst, J., Atzberger, C., Tol, C. Van Der, Damm, A., Rascher, U., Herrmann, I., Sobejano, V., Fahrner, S., Pieruschka, R., Prikaziuk, E., Luisa, M., Halabuk, A., Celesti, M., Koren, G., Gırmus, E. T., Rossini, M., Foerster, M., Siegmann, B., Abdelbaki, A., Tagliabue, G., Hank, T., Darvishzadeh, R., Aasen, H., Garcia,M., Pôças, S., Bandopadhyay, S., Sulis, M., Tomelleri, E., Roznstein, O., Filchev, L., Stancile, G., & Schlerf, M. (2022). Remote Sensing of Environment Multi-sensor spectral synergies for crop stress detection and monitoring in the optical domain: A review. Remote Sensing of Environment, 280, 113198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113198
  7. Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings Book of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, 144–152, PA, USA.
  8. Boswell, D. (2002). Introduction to support vector machines. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of California San Diego, 11, 16–17.
  9. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  10. Breirnan, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., & Stone, C. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Belrnont WadsWorth.
  11. Brinkhoff, J., Dunn, B. W., Dunn, T., Schultz, A., & Hart, J. (2025). Forecasting field rice grain moisture content using Sentinel-2 and weather data. Precision Agriculture, 26(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10228-2
  12. Bruno, M., Ravallion, M., & Squire, L. (1996). Equity and growth in developing countries: old and new perspectives on the policy issues, 1563. World Bank Publications.
  13. Çakmakçı, M. F., & Çakmakçı, R. (2023). Remote sensing, artificial intelligence and smart agriculture technology Trends of the future. European Journal of Science and Technology, 52, 234–246. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10439935
  14. Celik, M. F., Isik, M. S., Yuzugullu, O., Fajraoui, N., & Erten, E. (2022). Soil Moisture prediction from remote sensing images coupled with climate, soil texture and topography via deep learning. Remote Sensing, 14, 5584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215584
  15. Clay, D. E., Brugler, S., & Joshi, B. (2024). Will artificial intelligence and machine learning change agriculture: A special issue. Agronomy Journal, 116(3), 791–794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21555
  16. Clemente, J. P., Fontanelli, G., Ovando, G. G., Roa, Y. L. B., Lapini, A., & Santi, E. (2020). Google earth engine: Application of algorithms for remote sensing of crops in Tuscany (Italy). 2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference (LAGIRS), 195–200., Santiago, Chile.
  17. Clevers, J. G. P. W., & Gitelson, A. A. (2013). Remote estimation of crop and grass chlorophyll and nitrogen content using red-edge bands on Sentinel-2 and -3. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 23, 344–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.10.008
  18. Commoner, B. (2020). The closing circle: nature, man, and technology. Courier Dover Publications.
  19. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
  20. de Leeuw, J., Jia, H., Yang, L., Liu, X., Schmidt, K., & Skidmore, A. K. (2006). Comparing accuracy assessments to infer superiority of image classification methods. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(1), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500275762
  21. Demir, O., Gültekin, G. Ç., & Uzundumlu, A. S. (2023). The place and importance of agriculture in the Turkish economy. Journal of Animal Science and Economics, 2(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.5152/JASE.2023.23009
  22. Dhal, S., Wyatt, B. M., Mahanta, S., Bhattarai, N., Sharma, S., Rout, T., Saud, P., & Acharya, B. S. (2024). Internet of Things (IoT) in digital agriculture: An overview. Agronomy Journal, 116(3), 1144–1163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21385
  23. Doğan, Z., Arslan, S., & Berkman, A. N. (2015). Türkiye’ de tarım sektörünün iktisadi gelişimi ve sorunları: Tarihsel bir bakış. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 29–41.
  24. Domingos, P., & Pazzani, M. (1997). On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning, 29(2), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007413511361
  25. El-ghany, N. M. A., El-Aziz Abd, S. E., & Marei, S. S. (2020). A review: application of remote sensing as a promising strategy for insect pests and diseases management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 33503–33515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09517-2
  26. FAO. (2017). The future of food and agriculture Trends and challenges. FAO.
  27. Farmonov, N., Amankulova, K., Szatmári, J., Urinov, J., Nosirov, J., & Mucsi, L. (2023). Combining PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 images with environmental data for improved wheat yield estimation combining PlanetScope and Sentinel-2 images with. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2186505
  28. Fernández-Manso, A., Fernández-Manso, O., & Quintano, C. (2016). SENTINEL-2A red-edge spectral indices suitability for discriminating burn severity. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 50, 170–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.03.005
  29. Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., Connell, C. O., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E. M., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Carpenter, S. R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., & Zaks, D. P. M. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478(7369), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10452
  30. Gitelson, A., & Merzlyak, M. N. (1994). Spectral reflectance changes associated with autumn senescence of Aesculus hippocastanum L. and Acer platanoides L. leaves. Spectral features and relation to chlorophyll estimation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 143(3), 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81633-0
  31. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
  32. Gümüş, M. G. (2025). Performance analysis of water extraction indices with geospatial and statistical techniques using google earth engine platform: A case study of ramsar wetlands in Türkiye. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12524-025-02180-5/METRICS
  33. Gupta, P., & Shukla, D. P. (2024). Demi-decadal land use land cover change analysis of Mizoram, India, with topographic correction using machine learning algorithm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(21), 30569–30591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33094-3
  34. Hatfield, P. L., & Pinter Jr, P. J. (1993). Remote sensing for crop protection. Crop Protection, 12(6), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(93)90001-Y
  35. Huete, A., Justice, C., & Van Leeuwen, W. (1999). MODIS vegetation index (MOD13). Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, 3(213), 295–309.
  36. Huete, A. R. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 25(3), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90106-X
  37. Huete, A. R. (2012). Vegetation Indices, remote sensing and forest monitoring. Geography Compass, 6(9), 513–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00507.x
  38. Irz, X., Lin, L., Thirtle, C., & Wiggins, S. (2001). Agricultural productivity growth and poverty alleviation. Development Policy Review, 19(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00144
  39. Jiang, Z., Huete, A. R., Didan, K., & Miura, T. (2008). Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(10), 3833–3845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006
  40. Jin, Z., Azzari, G., You, C., Di Tommaso, S., Aston, S., Burke, M., & Lobell, D. B. (2019). Smallholder maize area and yield mapping at national scales with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing of Environment, 228, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.016
  41. John, G. H., & Langley, P. (2013). Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1302.4964. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1302.4964
  42. Joshi, D. R., Clay, S. A., Sharma, P., Rekabdarkolaee, H. M., Kharel, T., Rizzo, D. M., Thapa, R., & Clay, D. E. (2024). Artificial intelligence and satellite-based remote sensing can be used to predict soybean (Glycine max) yield. Agronomy Journal, 116(3), 917–930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21473
  43. Karthikeyan, L., Chawla, I., & Mishra, A. K. (2020). A review of remote sensing applications in agriculture for food security: Crop growth and yield, irrigation, and crop losses. Journal of Hydrology, 586, 124905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124905
  44. Kavzoğlu, T., & Çölkesen, İ. (2010). Investigation of the effects of kernel functions in satellite image classification using support vector machines. Harita Dergisi, 144(7), 73–82.
  45. Kaya, Y., & Polat, N. (2021). Wheat yield estimation using vegetation indices. Dicle University Journal of Engineering, 12(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.860325
  46. Khan, N., Ray, R. L., Sargani, G. R., Ihtisham, M., & Khayyam, M. (2021). Current progress and future prospects of agriculture technology: Gateway to sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13(9), 4883. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094883
  47. Khanal, S., Kc, K., Fulton, J. P., Shearer, S., & Ozkan, E. (2020). Remote sensing in agriculture — accomplishments, limitations, and opportunities. Remote Sensing, 12, 3783. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223783
  48. Koerner, L. M., Chadwick, M. A., & Tebbs, E. J. (2022). Mapping invasive strawberry guava (Psidium cattleianum) in tropical forests of Mauritius with Sentinel-2 and machine learning learning. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 43(3), 841–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2021.2020364
  49. Lin, L., Hao, Z., Post, C. J., Mikhailova, E. A., Yu, K., Yang, L., & Liu, J. (2020). Monitoring land cover change on a rapidly urbanizing island using google earth engine. Applied Sciences, 10(20), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207336
  50. Luqman, M., Ahmad, S. R., Khan, S., Ahmad, U., Raza, A., & Akmal, F. (2015). Estimation of solar energy potential from rooftop of Punjab government servants cooperative housing society Lahore using GIS. Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, 6(05), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2015.65012
  51. Mahmood, T., Usman, M., & Conrad, C. (2025). Selecting relevant features for random forest-based crop type classifications by spatial assessments of backward feature reduction. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-024-00329-4
  52. Maxwell, J., Yancho, M., Jones, T. G., Gandhi, S. R., Ferster, C., Lin, A., & Glass, L. (2020). The google earth engine mangrove mapping methodology (GEEMMM). Remote Sensing, 12(22), 3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223758
  53. McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295996
  54. Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
  55. Muruganantham, P., Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., & Samrat, N. H. (2022). A systematic literature review on crop yield prediction with deep learning and remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 14, 1990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14091990
  56. Neetu, & Ray, S. S. (2019). Exploring machine learning classification algorithms for crop classification using Sentinel 2 data. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 573–578. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W6-573-2019
  57. Noi, P. T., & Kappas, M. (2018). Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010018
  58. Oliveira, L. S. De, Castoldi, R., Martins, G. D., & Medeiros, M. H. (2023). Estimation of Strawberry crop productivity by machine learning algorithms using data from multispectral images. Agronomy, 13, 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051229
  59. Pal, M., Maxwell, A. E., & Warner, T. A. (2013). Kernel-based extreme learning machine for remote-sensing image classification. Remote Sensing Letters, 4(9), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2013.805279
  60. Pande, C. B., Diwate, P., Orimoloye, I. R., Sidek, L. M., Pratap Mishra, A., Moharir, K. N., Pal, S. C., Alshehri, F., & Tolche, A. D. (2024). Impact of land use/land cover changes on evapotranspiration and model accuracy using google earth engine and classification and regression tree modeling. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2290350
  61. Patil, T. R., & Sherekar, S. S. (2013). Performance analysis of naive bayes and J48 classification algorithm for data classification. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 6(2), 256–261.
  62. Praticò, S., Solano, F., Di Fazio, S., & Modica, G. (2021). Machine learning classification of mediterranean forest habitats in google earth engine based on seasonal sentinel-2 time-series and input image composition optimisation. Remote Sensing, 13(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040586
  63. Qazi, U. K., Ahmad, I., Minallah, N., & Zeeshan, M. (2024). Classification of tobacco using remote sensing and deep learning techniques. Agronomy Journal, 116(3), 839–847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21382
  64. Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A. R., Kerr, Y. H., & Sorooshian, S. (1994). A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 48(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)90134-1
  65. Ren, J., Lee, S. D., Chen, X., Kao, B., Cheng, R., & Cheung, D. (2009). Naive bayes classification of uncertain data. Proceedings Book of Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Miami Beach, FL, USA, 944–949. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2009.90
  66. Rish, I. (2001). An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier. IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, 3(22), 41–46.
  67. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017
  68. Romano, E., Fania, F., Pecorella, I., Spadanuda, P., Roncetti, M., Zullo, D., Giuntoli, G., Bisaglia, C., Bragaglio, A., Bergonzoli, S., & De Vita, P. (2025). Stability maps using historical NDVI images on durum wheat to understand the causes of spatial variability. Precision Agriculture, 26(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-025-10222-8
  69. Rondeaux, G., Steven, M., & Baret, F. (1996). Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 55, 95–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00186-7
  70. Rosegrant, M. W., Sulser, T. B., Dunston, S., Mishra, A., Cenacchi, N., Gebretsadik, Y., Robertson, R., Thomas, T., & Wiebe, K. (2024). Food and nutrition security under changing climate and socioeconomic conditions. Global Food Security, 41, 100755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2024.100755
  71. Roßberg, T., & Schmitt, M. (2023). A globally applicable method for NDVI estimation from Sentinel-1 SAR backscatter using a deep neural network and the SEN12TP dataset. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science, 91(3), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-023-00238-y
  72. Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with erts. NASA Spec, 351, 309.
  73. Samanta, S., & Jha, M. K. (2011). Modeling a rail transit alignment considering different objectives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.09.001
  74. Shetty, S., Gupta, P. K., Belgiu, M., & Srivastav, S. K. (2021). Assessing the effect of training sampling design on the performance of machine learning classifiers for land cover mapping using multi-temporal remote sensing data and google earth engine. Remote Sensing, 13, 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081433
  75. Shokirov, S., Abdurahmanov, I., Mamatkulov, Z., Abdurahmanov, Z., Zarifboev, D., Oymatov, R., Kovács, Z., Csabai, J., Shiping, Y., & Khakberdiev, O. (2025). Leveraging vegetation indices and random forest for soil nutrient monitoring in winter wheat. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12524-025-02198-9/FIGURES/6
  76. Sidhu, N., Pebesma, E., & Câmara, G. (2018). Using google earth engine to detect land cover change: Singapore as a use case. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 51(1), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1451782
  77. Sims, D. A., & Gamon, J. A. (2002). Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sensing of Environment, 81(2–3), 337–354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00010-X
  78. Şimşek, F. F., & Durduran, S. S. (2023). Land cover classification using land parcel identification system (LPIS) data and open source eo-learn library. Geocarto International, 38(1), 2146760. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2146760
  79. Stephen, S., Haldar, D., & Patel, N. R. (2022). Impact of various vegetation indices on mango orchard mapping using object-based image analysis. Journal of Geomatics, 16(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58825/jog.2022.16.2.45
  80. Tait, J., & Morris, D. (2000). Sustainable development of agricultural systems: competing objectives and critical limits. Futures, 32, 247–260.
  81. Teck, V., Poortinga, A., Riano, C., Dahal, K., Legaspi, R. M. B., Ann, V., & Chea, R. (2023). Land use and land cover change implications on agriculture and natural resource management of Koah Nheaek, Mondulkiri province, Cambodia. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 29, 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100895
  82. Teimouri, M., Mokhtarzade, M., Baghdadi, N., & Heipke, C. (2023). Generating virtual training labels for crop classification from fused Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science, 91(6), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-023-00256-w
  83. Thirtle, C., Lin, L., & Piesse, J. (2003). The impact of research-led agricultural productivity growth on poverty reduction in Africa, Asia and Latin America. World Development, 31(12), 1959–1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.07.001
  84. Türk, B., & Şen, F. (2020). Determination of physicochemical characteristic of strawberry C. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science, 6(3), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.719664
  85. Vapnik, V. N. (1998). Adaptive and learning systems for signal processing communications, and control. Statistical learning theory. John Wiley & Sons.
  86. Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., & Newig, J. (2015). What Is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7, 7833–7865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067833
  87. Wahap, N. A., & Shafri, H. Z. M. (2020). Utilization of google earth engine (GEE) for land cover monitoring over Klang valley, Malaysia. Proceedings Book of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/540/1/012003
  88. Webb, G. I., Keogh, E., & Miikkulainen, R. (2010). Naïve bayes. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 15(1), 713–714.
  89. Winzeler, H. E., Mancini, M., Blackstock, J. M., Libohova, Z., Owens, P. R., Ashworth, A. J., Miller, D. M., & Silva, S. H. G. (2024). Vegetation masking of remote sensing data aids machine learning for soil fertility prediction. Remote Sensing, 16, 3297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173297
  90. Xue, J., & Su, B. (2017). Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: A review of developments and applications. Journal of Sensors, 2017(1), 1353691. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1353691
  91. Yalçin, G. E., & Kara, F. Ö. (2016). Rural migration and effects on agricultural production. Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science, 20(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.259106
  92. Yang, F.-J. (2018). An implementation of naive bayes classifier. Proceedings Book of 2018 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCI46756.2018.00065
  93. Yao, J., Wu, J., Xiao, C., Zhang, Z., & Li, J. (2022). The classification method study of crops remote sensing with deep learning, machine learning, and google earth engine. Remote Sensing, 14(12), 2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122758
  94. Yerdelen, A., Mermer, A., Dedeoğlu, F., Yildiz, H., Kaya, Y., Süzer, S., & Öcal, M. B. (2008). Determination of crop cultivation patterns using geographic information systems and remote sensing and sunflower yield prediction in Edirne. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1–2).
  95. Yilmaz, O. S., Gulgen, F., Balik Sanli, F., & Ates, A. M. (2023). The performance analysis of different water indices and algorithms using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 images in determining water surface: Demirkopru dam case study. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48, 7883–7903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-022-07583-x
  96. Yılmaz, O. S. (2023). Uzaktan Algılama Performance analysis of water extraction indices used in detection of water surfaces with remote sensing techniques. Turkish Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 4(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.48123/rsgis.1256092
  97. Zeferino, L. B., Souza, L. F. T. de, Amaral, C. H. do, Fernandes Filho, E. I., & Oliveira, T. S. de. (2020). Does environmental data increase the accuracy of land use and land cover classification? International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 91, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102128
  98. Zhang, H. (2004). The optimality of naive bayes. Aa, 1(2), 3.
  99. Zheng, C., Abd-Elrahman, A., & Whitaker, V. (2021). Remote sensing and machine learning in crop phenotyping and management, with an emphasis on applications in strawberry farming. Remote Sensing, 13, 531. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030531
  100. Zhu, L., Meng, J., & Zhu, L. (2020). Applying Geodetector to disentangle the contributions of natural and anthropogenic factors to NDVI variations in the middle reaches of the Heihe River Basin. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106545