Journals / Gazi Akademik Bakış / 2018 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 22

Uncovering the Party Effect in the US Congress

Pages
291–304
Publication Date
2018-06-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed methods involves using expert surveys todetermine the level of party effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although there has been a voluminous literature on American foreign policy and its effect on severalregions, research on American domestic politics has been relatively scarce.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to its significant impacton foreign policy formation, the Presidency received a lot of scholarly attention.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed methods involves using expert surveys todetermine the level of party effect.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:congress · party effect

Özet

Although there has been a voluminous literature on American foreign policy and its effect on severalregions, research on American domestic politics has been relatively scarce. Due to its significant impacton foreign policy formation, the Presidency received a lot of scholarly attention. This paper, on the otherhand, focuses on another important actor in American foreign and domestic policy: The United StatesCongress. In this respect, we specifically aim to contribute to the literature on American Congress whichaims to uncover the party effect on legislative behavior. Current studies on the topic usually rely on rollcallvotes. Although this method has been quite popular, recent studies indicate problems in terms ofmeasuring the true effect of the party. Hence, this study proposes an alternative method which has beenwidely used in the European Politics literature. The proposed methods involves using expert surveys todetermine the level of party effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, A. T. (2018). Uncovering the Party Effect in the US Congress. Gazi Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 22, 291–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/156255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ADLER, E. Scott, “Constituency Characteristics and the ‘Guardian’ Model of Appropriations Subcommittees, 1959-1998”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, 2000, pp. 104-114.
  2. ADLER, E. Scott, and LAPINSKI, John S., “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 41, 1997, pp. 895-918.
  3. ALDRICH, John H., and ROHDE, David W., “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 62 No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-33.
  4. ANSOLABEHERE, Stephen, SNYDER Jr, James M., and STEWART III, Charles, “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting”, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2001, pp. 533-572.
  5. BINDER, Sarah A., LAWRANCE, Eric D., and MALTZMAN, Forest, “Uncovering the Hidden Effect of Party.” Journal of Politics, Vol. 61, 1999, pp. 815-831.
  6. BRADY, Davis, Congressional Voting in a Partisan Era, University of Kansas Press, 1973.
  7. BULUT, Alper T., “Measuring Political Agenda Setting and Representation in Turkey: Introducing a New Approach and Data Set”, Party Politics, Vol. 23 No. 6, 2017, pp. 717-730.
  8. CARSEY, Thomas M., and RUNDQUIST, Barry, “Party and Committee in Distributive Politics: Evidence from Defense Spending”, Journal of Politics, Vol. 61, 1999, pp. 1156-1169.
  9. COOPER, Joseph, “Strengthening the Congress: An Organizational Perspective”, Harvard Journal of Legislation, Vol. 12, 1974, pp. 307-68.
  10. COOPER, Joseph, and BRADY, David W., “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 75, 1981, pp. 411-25.
  11. COX, Garry W., and McCUBBINS, Mathew D., Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
  12. CROMBEZ, Christophe, GROSECLOSE, Tim, and KREHBIEL, Keith, “Gatekeeping”, Journal of Politics, Vol. 68 No. 2, 2006, pp. 322-334.