AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThethird argument is that the rivalry between the two countries was mainly in the form of a proxywar but resulted in the fact that the balance of power struggle in the region reached to the proxywar balance as no country managed to outcompete the other.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
This study examines the Iran-Saudi rivalry within the context of the changing balance ofpower in the Middle East. The main research questions were determined to be what the dynamicsof the Iran-Saudi rivalry are and what type of role Turkey may play within the rivalrybetween the two countries. Three essential arguments were developed within this context. Thefirst argument is that the regional balances were broken by the US occupation of Iraq in 2003and by the ‘Arab Spring’ process resulting in the regional hegemony rivalry between Iran andSaudi Arabia. The second one is that Iran desired to utilize the Arab Spring process as anopportunity to become a regional hegemonic power. On the other hand, the policy of the USto withdraw from and leave the Middle East to its allies Israel and Saudi Arabia caused KingSalman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud to adopt a regional leadership policy. Within this framework,the study argued that the rivalry to become the new regional hegemon of the Middle East resurgedbetween Iran and Saudi Arabia, the two historic rival powers of the Middle East. Thethird argument is that the rivalry between the two countries was mainly in the form of a proxywar but resulted in the fact that the balance of power struggle in the region reached to the proxywar balance as no country managed to outcompete the other.