Journals / Türkiye İstatistik Derneği İstatistik Dergisi / 2002 / Volume: 5 Issue: 1

ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS

Pages
—
Publication Date
2002-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ordering of claim size risks can be done by stochastic dominance, stop-loss dominance andseveral other modalities of stochastic orders for decision making under uncertainty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Emergence of risks can bedeteected in terms of some interdependent variables and factors such as risk reserves and premium amounts.Risk ordering must be done by models that take account of this interdependence.This paper discusses some major stochastic order modalities for comparisons of risks and introduces anew risk ordering criterion in terms or record values of claim size sequences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Record values · distribution of total claim amount · risk orderings

Abstract

Ordering of claim size risks can be done by stochastic dominance, stop-loss dominance andseveral other modalities of stochastic orders for decision making under uncertainty. Emergence of risks can bedeteected in terms of some interdependent variables and factors such as risk reserves and premium amounts.Risk ordering must be done by models that take account of this interdependence.This paper discusses some major stochastic order modalities for comparisons of risks and introduces anew risk ordering criterion in terms or record values of claim size sequences. Comparison of two independentportfolios is shown by these risk ordering approaches

🔖

Cite This Article

Gebizlioglu, O. L., Tank., F. (2002). ORDERING OF CLAIM SIZE RISKS AND ACTUARIAL IMPLICATIONS. Türkiye İstatistik Derneği İstatistik Dergisi, Volume: 5 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1562076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahsanullah, M. (1985), Record Statistics. Nova Scince Publisher
  2. Bairamov, I.G., (1997) Some distribution free properties of statistics based on record values and charecterization of the distributions through a record, Journal of Applies Statistical Science, Vol.5 No.1 pp.17-25.
  3. Daykin, C.D., Pentikainen, T., Pesonen, E., (1995), Practical Risk Theory for Actuaries. Chapman and Hall
  4. Goldie C., Rogers L.C.G., (1984), The k-record process are iid. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie Verw Gebiete Vol. 67, 197-211.
  5. Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Heerwaarden, A.E., Bauwelinckx, T., (1990), Effective Actuarial Methods, North Holland.
  6. Gupta R.C., (1984), Relations between order statistics and record values and some charecterization results. Journal of Applied Probability, 21, 425-430.
  7. Heilmann W.R., (1986), Fundamentals of Risk Theory, VVW Karlsruhe
  8. Mosler K., Scarsini M. (1991), Stochastic Orders and Decision Under Risk, IMS Lecture Notes-Mongraph Series, Vol.19
  9. Nagaraja H.N. (1978), On the expected values of record values, Australian Journal of Statistics, 20(2), 182.
  10. Nagaraja H.N. (1988), Record values and related statistics-A revies. Communications in Statistics
  11. Theory and Methods, 17(7),2223-2238.
  12. Resnick S.L., (1987), Extreme Values, Regular Variation and Point Process, Springer-Verlag.
  13. Shaked M., Shantikumar J.G, (1994), Stochastic Orders and Their Applications, Academic Press.