Journals / Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

-

KADIN GİRİŞİMCİLER SCHUMPETER’İN GİRİŞİMCİSİ OLURSA....

Pages
249–259
Publication Date
2015-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When we evaluate the interviews results of women entrepreneurs using qualitative analysis tools; personality traits attributed to entrepreneurs by Schumpeter have emerged and the similarities in their basic motivation sources have been found remarkable

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although at different times of the historical process, entrepreneurship has been expressed by using different terms by different authors; entrepreneurship’s key role in the economic development has been accepted.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Schumpeter's theory of entrepreneurship is not only economic; reveals an entrepreneurial profile can incorporate social features.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When we evaluate the interviews results of women entrepreneurs using qualitative analysis tools; personality traits attributed to entrepreneurs by Schumpeter have emerged and the similarities in their basic motivation sources have been found remarkable
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Women entrepreneurship · Schumpeter · Qualitative analysis

Abstract

Although at different times of the historical process, entrepreneurship has been expressed by using different terms by different authors; entrepreneurship’s key role in the economic development has been accepted. This study is based on Schumpeter’s interpretation of entrepreneurship which has the most meaningful rationalization of its role in the economic development. Personality traits that Schumpeter attributed to entrepreneurs their entrepreneurial instincts; it is evident that entrepreneurs have different characteristics compared to average individuals. Schumpeter's theory of entrepreneurship is not only economic; reveals an entrepreneurial profile can incorporate social features. The interviews conducted with a total of 41 women, in Ankara, indicate in first-hand that this is a provision on women entrepreneurs. When we evaluate the interviews results of women entrepreneurs using qualitative analysis tools; personality traits attributed to entrepreneurs by Schumpeter have emerged and the similarities in their basic motivation sources have been found remarkable

Özet

Girişimciliğin iktisadi gelişmenin motoru olduğu yadsınamaz bir gerçekliktir. Girişimcilik tarihsel süreç içerisinde farklı dönemlerde farklı yazarlar tarafından değişik anlamlarla ifade edilmiş olsa da, kavramın iktisadi gelişmedeki anahtar rolü herkes tarafından kabul edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, girişimciliğin iktisadi gelişme içerisindeki rolünü en anlamlı bir biçimde ortaya koyan Schumpeter’in girişimciliği üzerinedir. Schumpeter’in girişimciye atfettiği kişilik özellikleri ve girişimcileri motive eden güdüler; girişimcinin ortalama kişilerden farklı özelliklere sahip kişiler olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Aynı zamanda, Schumpeter’in girişimcilik teorisi sadece iktisadi değil; toplumsal özellikleri de içine alan bir girişimci profilini ortaya koymaktadır. Ankara ve çevre ilçelerinde 41 kadın ile yaptığımız görüşmeler, ilk ağızdan bunun kadın girişimciler üzerinde bir karşılığı olduğunu göstermektedir. Elde ettiğimiz mülakat sonuçlarını nitel analiz yöntemi ile değerlendirdiğimizde, Kadın girişimcilerin; Schumpeter’in girişimcisine atfettiği kişilik özelliklerine sahip olduğu ortaya çıkarken; temel motivasyon kaynaklarındaki benzerlik de dikkat çekicidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAKAY, B., TÜZÜN, İ. K. (2015). -. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 249–259. https://ajindex.com/articles/156024

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ARAZ TAKAY Bahar ve GÜLER AYDIN Derya (2013); “Kapitalizmin Şövalyeleri ve Sanayi Kaptanları Üzerine” H.Ü İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, cilt 31, sayı 2: 153-165.
  2. BASILGAN, Müslüm (2011); “Ekonomik Gelişmenin Yaratıcı Yıkımı: Schumpeteryen Girişimci” Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt 44, Sayı 3: 27-56.
  3. BROUWER, T. Maria (2002); “Weber, Schumpeter and Knight of Entrepreneurship and Economic Development” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12: 83-105
  4. ELLIOTT, E. John (2001); “Schumpeter’s Theory of Economic Development and Social Change: Exposition and Assessment”, International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 12, (6/7): 6-33.
  5. PRAAG, Van Mirjam (1999); “Some Classical Views of Entrepreneurship” De Economics, 143(3): 331-348
  6. LEGRIS, Andrea (2002);“On the Boundaries between Economic Analysis and Economic Sociology”, Arena, Richard - Dangel-Hagnauer, Cecile (Eds.), The Contribution of Joseph A. Schumpeter to Economics: Economic Development and Institutional Change, Routledge, London and New York: 89-105.
  7. REISMAN, A.David. (2004); Schumpeter’s Market: Entrprice and Evolution, Edward Elgar, UK. OSEIFUAH, E. Koja (2010); “Financial literacy and youth entrepreneurship in South Africa”, African Journal of Economicand Management Studies, 1(2): 164-182.
  8. SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph (1934);
  9. The Theory of Economics Development, Oxford University Press,
  10. Oxford, U.K. SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph (1939); Business Cycless: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, Vol: I, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.,New York and London. SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph (1943);
  11. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: George allen and Unwin Ltd SCHUMPETER, A. Joseph (1954);
  12. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford Press, UK