Journals / Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Spatial Concentration and Regional Diversification of Public Expenditures: The Case of Turkey

Niğde Üniversitesi

Pages
89–98
Publication Date
2015-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical results indicate that, over the sample period, the government carried out a spatial concenration on housing and social welfare services expenditures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Public expenditure is one of the most important variables on determining both the share of public sector in an economy and the size of national income.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the purpose, Herfindahl–Hirschman and Duranton–Puga indices are generated for the period of 2004 and 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical results indicate that, over the sample period, the government carried out a spatial concenration on housing and social welfare services expenditures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Functional public expenditures · spatial concentration · Herfindahl – Hirschman Index

Abstract

Public expenditure is one of the most important variables on determining both the share of public sector in an economy and the size of national income. Explaining the distribution of public expenditures across the country is as equally important as determining its relationship with other variables. The distribution of public expenditures may vary in terms of regional and functional classifications. The differences can provide information about the policies favored by the government. The aim of this paper is to analyze the spatial concentration and regional diversification of functional public expenditures in Turkey. For the purpose, Herfindahl–Hirschman and Duranton–Puga indices are generated for the period of 2004 and 2011. Statistical results indicate that, over the sample period, the government carried out a spatial concenration on housing and social welfare services expenditures. In addition, Bursa emerges as the province where regional diversification is highest.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTÜRK, K., TAYLOR, İ. H. (2015). Spatial Concentration and Regional Diversification of Public Expenditures: The Case of Turkey. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 89–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/156016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Allen, Franklin, Bartiloro, Laura and Kowalewski, Oskar (2005), “The Financial System of The EU 25”, MRPA Paper, No:652. Bergstresser, Daniel (2008), “Market Concentration and Commercial Bank Loan Portfolios”, Harvard Business School Working Paper Series. Borge, Lars-Erik (2000), “Charging for Public Services: The Case of Utilities in Norwegian Local Governments”, Regional Science & Urban Economics”, 30; 703-718.
  2. Borge, Lars-Erik (2005), “Strong Politicians Small Deficits: Evidence from Norwegian Local Governments”, European Journal of Political Economy, Volume:21; 325-344.
  3. Borge, Lars-Erik and Naper, Linn Renee (2006), “Efficiency Potential and Efficiency Variation in Norwegian Lower Secondary Schools”, Public Finance Analysis, Volume:62, No:2; 221- 249. Borge, Lars-Erik, Falch, Torberg and Tovmo, Per (2008), “Public Sector Efficiency: The Roles of Political and Budgetary Intitutions, Fiscal Capacity and Democratic Participation”, Public Choice, 136; 475-795.
  4. Calkins, Stephen (1983), “The New Merger Guidelines and the Herfindahl – Hirschman Index”, California Law Review, Volume 71, Issue 2. Camadan, Ercüment ve Erten, İbrahim, E. (2010), “Üretim Özelleştirmeleri Öncesinde Türkiye Elektrik Piyasasında Piyasa Gücünün Değerlendirilmesi”, Enerji, Piyasa ve Düzenleme, Cilt:1, Sayı:1; 51-75.
  5. Chortareas, Georgios E, Garza-Garcia, Jesus G and Girardone Claudia (2012), “Competiton, Efficiency and Interest Rate Margins in Latin American Banking”, International Review of Financial Analysis Volume: 24; 93-103.
  6. Chung, Kevin YC, Derdenger, Timothy P, and Srinivasan, Kannan (2013), “Economic Value of Celebrity Endorsements: Tiger Woods’ Impact on Sales of Nike Golf Balls”, Marketing Science, Volume:32, Issue:2; 271-293.
  7. Değer, Mustafa Kemal (2010), “İhracatta Ürün Çeşitliliği ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Türkiye Deneyimi (1980 – 2006)”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 24, Sayı 2; 259-287.
  8. Depken II, Craig, A. (1999), “Free-Agency and The Competitiveness of Major League Baseball”, Review of Industrial Organization, Volume:14, Issue:3; 205-217.
  9. Doğan, Seyhun ve Kaya, Semanur S. (2011), “Gümrük Birliği Sonrasında (1996 – 2009) Türkiye’nin Avrupa Birliği ile Dış Ticaretinin Ülke ve Fasıl Bazlı Yoğunlaşma Analizi”, Ekonometri ve İstatistik, Sayı 14; 1-18.
  10. Duranton, Gilles and Puga Diego (2000), “Diversity and Specialization in Cities: Why, Where and When Does it Matter?”, Urban Studies, Vol 37, No:3; 533 – 555. Durukan, Tülin ve Hamurcu Çağrı (2009), “Mo